Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2005 2:08:38 PM PST by KidGlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: KidGlock
You mean soon-to-be Chief Justice Thomas?
2 posted on 02/23/2005 2:10:37 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock
Thank you for expressing your insignificant little opinion, Anita.

Now sit down and shut up.

3 posted on 02/23/2005 2:11:14 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock
In the 13 years since Anita Hill lied during Senate confirmation hearings about alleged sexual harassment by then-Supreme Court Justice nominee Clarence Thomas,
4 posted on 02/23/2005 2:11:28 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock
More words of wisdom from Anita Hill.


5 posted on 02/23/2005 2:11:58 PM PST by Enterprise (President Bush thought Wead was a friend. Turns out he was just a big fat tape worm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

Who is Anita Hill? What does this twit have to say that is relevent?


6 posted on 02/23/2005 2:12:25 PM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

Anita Hill is the best example of why there should not be affirmative action.


She was drug off the farm and placed in situations far beyond her capacity. As a chosen one she was yanked up the chain with a wink and a nod.

Finallly, when she got to DC and placed in competition with real black girls who actually knew their stuff did she realize it was all a sham.

Anita Hill is an American travesty.


7 posted on 02/23/2005 2:12:38 PM PST by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

Yes, she gave birth to the "It's not the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of the charge" tack the Left loves to take (when the charges are against Republicans).


9 posted on 02/23/2005 2:12:56 PM PST by Guillermo ("Now how can a Puerto Rican lose a fly ball in the sun?' - Harry Caray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

Justice Thomas' rulings have long since discredited his old critics...and it is by *rulings*, not ideology, character, or anything else, by which Justices should be judged.

11 posted on 02/23/2005 2:13:21 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

If it weren't for the "progressive" safety net under otherwise unemployable fruitbats like her, Ward Churchill, and most of the college faculties in America, Anita Hill would be wandering around downtown with a paper cup and a "will work for tenure" sign.


12 posted on 02/23/2005 2:13:32 PM PST by Argus (My tagline wishes it was as good as your tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock
Hill said she plans to focus on contemporary issues having to do with "where we are as a generation on the issues of women in political and public leadership."

Does the name Condi Rice ring a bell?

"It is still important for us to look back at the election that we just went through ... and get a sense of how successful we are in influencing these elections," she said.

Oh yes, you influenced the elections. Thank you.


13 posted on 02/23/2005 2:13:32 PM PST by glock rocks (WYGIWYG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

One more comment.... the people who pushed Anita are the same people who foisted Hillary on America as the Smartest woman.


15 posted on 02/23/2005 2:14:14 PM PST by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

You mean you remember, Anita? Gosh. I watched your testimony, and after that performance, I'm surprised you can remember your own name from day to day.


16 posted on 02/23/2005 2:15:04 PM PST by RichInOC (...somebody had to say it...why not me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

Anita is SO yesterday.


17 posted on 02/23/2005 2:15:19 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock
I wonder if she still commands $20K a speech like she did the days immediately following the Thomas confirmation hearings.
18 posted on 02/23/2005 2:16:10 PM PST by Sir_Humphrey (The mighty oak is just a nut who held it's ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

Anita Hill--> still a b*tch


19 posted on 02/23/2005 2:16:31 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Open borders=National suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

You know...

I've seen his record of service to the nation...

And I've seen hers.

I'll take his.


21 posted on 02/23/2005 2:16:54 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (When everybody has an agenda, reason finishes last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

In his willingness to revisit (usually through dissents or concurring opinions) the Court's fraudulent past holdings on issues like the Commerce Clause power, First Amendment Establishment Clause issues, 14th Amendment substantive due process and the general welfare clause of Article I, Justice Thomas has distinguished himself as a jurist committed to an intellectually honest interpretation of the Constitution. Yes...his opinions are sometimes far outside what is considered the "legal mainstream" but that is only a reflection of how far "maintream constitutional law" is from the actual Constitution.

Justice Thomas would be, by far, the best choice for Chief Justice...far better even than Justice Scalia


22 posted on 02/23/2005 2:16:58 PM PST by Irontank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock

Well, what did they expect her to say? "I was wrong and he's a good justice?" Of course not!


23 posted on 02/23/2005 2:17:36 PM PST by VRWCisme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock
We DON'T believe you Anita.
24 posted on 02/23/2005 2:17:53 PM PST by Navy Patriot (I'm gonna hear it for this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KidGlock
Well now...there's somebody whose opinion is really really relevant....

Perhaps she could also provide us her opinion on whether or not one should really squeeze the Charmin, or if natural peanutbutter tastes better than the other kind...oh....and her deepest thoughts on why light only travels at the speed of light!

Yesssir...Ms. Anita Hill. My choice for "Miss Relevant"!

27 posted on 02/23/2005 2:19:28 PM PST by Logic n' Reason (Don't piss down my back and tell me it's rainin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson