Savage also produced some Internet hype in 2003 with a unique attack against Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, ...A new noun -- "Santorum" -- swept through cyberspace, invented by Savage to describe in vulgar detail the by-product of a homosexual encounter. Savage even devoted an entire website to promoting his new word, which in turn won him the most outrageous word of 2004 at the American Dialect Society.
A moment of clarity from one sick jerk.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
I have been following his column in the local liberal rag for some time. While he is otherwise a jerk, this idea of his struck me as being right on. His defense of it against those who have written in against it, comes across as quite conservative. He is actually more conservative in his column about sex than many Republicans that I know. He calls a slut a stupid slut, a spade a spade. Makes for some interesting reading on the train when I have exhausted the morning paper.
Seems reasonable to me. I think they ought to have to pay for their funerals, and punitive damages too.
Yes but...... if one is having anonymous sexual encounters with many partners, who exactly infected you?
That aside, this guy Savage is seriously bent!
How about crimnial murder charges?
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
|
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
|
| Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
Ping
very difficult. I read yesterday about the regular gay's way of life. They have an average of 500-1,000 partners in their life. How to know which one of them is the culprit?.
Only if the 'affected partner' is not also promiscuous and has taken all available precautions.
No laboratory has ever obtained an isolate of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), despite countless attempts. Neither Montaigner nor Gallo, the "discoverers of HIV" were able to isolate HIV. The multi-billion dollar AIDS industry has failed to isolate HIV after decades of extremely well-funded research - indeed it has failed even to produce a candidate virus particle and then to show that that particle is able to replicate in a virus-like manner. This is a basic first step of clinical epidemiology and is conspicuous by its absence. It is not known that the HIV virus even exists, despite over twenty years of research. After twenty years we can surely hazard a guess that no virus is there to be found.
Instead of isolating the virus, laboratories, clinics and medical corporations have come to accept certain indirect signs, or markers, such as antibody reactions, proteins, genetic fragments, "virus-like" particles, enzymes - that could indeed suggest the prescence of a virus but could as easily point to other things - as proving the presence and existence of this virion, HIV.
This lowering of the bar for proof-of-virus has not only led to a clinical disaster in AIDs science (50,000 US citizens killed by AZT), it has led to many new fake-viruses (Hep-C for instance) which also cannot be isolated. And like HIV, the new no-proof-needed viruses also exhibit a distinctly non-viral epidemiology. They only cause symptoms within groups with suspiciously toxic behaviour (heavy drinking, drug use, malnutrition, heavy sugar ingestion), just as HIV only killed people who were overdosing on nitrate poppers, before it started killing only people who were on lethal doses of AZT
The idea of forcing people to pay for their self-inflicted illnesses is an excellent one. Those AIDs "victims" who are actually suffering from dissipate life styles - yeah, throw the book at them. But don't force them to buy so-called anti-virals - those poisonous HAART drugs are the new cause of AIDs
Stupid idea. There are already lots of horror stories about false paternity, and that is with a test that can pretty much determine paternity with 100% accuracy. Any "I got the virus from Joe" would be just heresay arguments. Jonah has no way of proving he didn't also sleep with Jeff, Jason, Jeremy and John. The virus is not typed individually. A chlid is, via DNA.
I have a better idea. Why don't we not pay for HIV and Aids treatment except for spouses and children.
States will do anything to raise revenues now. Things they would never allow private citizens to do.