Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Florida State Supreme Court) Order Dismissing for Lack of Jurisdiction
Florida Supreme Court ^ | March 21, 2005

Posted on 03/21/2005 9:57:11 PM PST by bd476

Supreme Court of Florida

MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2005
CASE NO.: SC05-460


COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM
OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES vs. MICHAEL SCHIAVO, ET AL.

___________________________________________________________________
Petitioner(s) Respondent(s)

The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because there is no independent basis alleged to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.

A True Copy

Test:

kd Served:

KERRY W. KIRCHER
GERALDINE R. GENNET
DAVID PLOTINSKY
DAVID CHARLES GIBBS, III
GEORGE J. FELOS
DEBORAH BUSHNELL


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: schiavo; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
"This appears to be throwing out the Congressional subpoena of Terri on final appeal, but I'll check further."

I wouldn't be so quick to come to that conclusion. Contempt of Congress is really a federal matter. I don't think Florida courts have jurisdiction to hear such a matter.

61 posted on 03/21/2005 10:23:19 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ
THIS HAS NOTHING..DONT CONFUSE THEM!....*in Ruth Buzzy's voice*..THANK YOU...(understood :^)
62 posted on 03/21/2005 10:24:15 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

If this is about a federal subpoena, and I don't know, why would you think a state court would have jurisdiction to enforce it? We have federal courts for a reason.


63 posted on 03/21/2005 10:24:49 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
worth repeating...

This is the Florida Supreme Court--not U.S. District Court.


64 posted on 03/21/2005 10:25:39 PM PST by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

This really doesn't dispose of the subpoena issue. It merely means the matter will not be reviewed by a Florida court. I would imagine that would be considered by a federal court as well.


65 posted on 03/21/2005 10:25:59 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

Fine, how exactly do they enforce them?


66 posted on 03/21/2005 10:26:36 PM PST by Graymatter (Tick...tick...tick...ON...JEB'S...WATCH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Torie

I would assume that in order to have a federal court hear this matter at the district or appellate level the Congress would have to have a ruling from the highest court in the State of Florida.


67 posted on 03/21/2005 10:28:11 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Someone should take this off Breaking News.. its going to confuse people about what happened last night.. two seperate issues..


68 posted on 03/21/2005 10:28:29 PM PST by Next_Time_NJ (NJ demorat exterminator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Meanwhile--here is a description of the U.S. District Court proceeding today:

Judge Whittemore at times sighed, paused and buried his face in his hands during the hearing. He wanted details of how long it would take to transport Ms. Schiavo from her hospice to a nearby hospital and replace the tube - about two hours, the lawyers said - and what the procedure involved. Both sides said it would require surgery and that Ms. Schiavo would need to be hospitalized for several days while her electrolyte balance was restored.

69 posted on 03/21/2005 10:29:15 PM PST by NautiNurse (May the road rise up to meet you; May the wind always be at your back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

Congress just runs down to the local federal court, and gets a contempt of Congress order. I don't think Congress is into that anymore. It was all so transparent, and well, embarrassing. Congress was wise to move onto plan B.


70 posted on 03/21/2005 10:29:41 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ

Read what you just said. They are different issues. And whether the case is in federal court or not has no bearing on whether the Florida Court can act on a Subpeona for persons in their jurisdiction. They have jurisdiction in florida. In point of fact, if they don't have, then they've just admitted they had no jurisdiction to decide the matter in the first place.

IMHO, it is time to send in the US Marshal service and start knockin heads.


71 posted on 03/21/2005 10:30:02 PM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

I would gladly BOYCOTT ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING FROM FLORIDA if Terri dies.

Florida...the new France.


72 posted on 03/21/2005 10:30:03 PM PST by Tax Government (DEATHocrats infest the country. Contribute to FR; that may help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ; Admin Moderator

I would disagree. This is just a piece of the whole puzzle of litigation. I would merely give a new title to the thread.


73 posted on 03/21/2005 10:30:13 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Not for a Congressional subpoena. That is a federal matter. It is none of any state's business.


74 posted on 03/21/2005 10:30:40 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

Real simple, just walk right on over and knock on the door of the US Justice dept. Story at 11.


75 posted on 03/21/2005 10:32:28 PM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

A Florida court is in no position to make a ruling on defiance of a Congressional subpoena. I cannot understand why Congress went to the Florida courts on this matter in the first place. Kind of a wasted move in my opinion.


76 posted on 03/21/2005 10:32:39 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: onyx; bd476

Last of the fancy ball room dancers so I hear .......:o)


77 posted on 03/21/2005 10:32:57 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Then why in the Sam Hill did congress request writs from the Florida courts? Was it just a bit of posturing or what?


78 posted on 03/21/2005 10:34:16 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas

Beats me. It seems ludicrous. But maybe there are nuances I am missing.


79 posted on 03/21/2005 10:35:16 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

YES!
The original "Shall We Dance?"
is one of my favorites. It's
the Japanese version with English
subtitles.


80 posted on 03/21/2005 10:35:58 PM PST by onyx (Robert Frost "Good fences make good neighbors." Build the fence, Mr. President and Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson