Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGavin999
But remember, he has to make sure he is on firm constitutional footing.

Doesn't seem to matter. The courts don't read the Constitution anymore. So whether he does something constitutional or not the courts will say it is not and have her killed.

28 posted on 03/23/2005 9:47:48 AM PST by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Rokurota
That is another problem that must be addressed. Our courts are totally out of control. Their rulings are inconsistant to the point where the law is becoming a joke.

First they rule that states have no right to determin things like whether a 17 year old has a right to murder and live and an 18 year old can die. Then they rule that a state court CAN decide that a disabled woman can be killed because her adulterous husband wants it. They decide that the first ammendment doesn't apply to political speech, but it does apply to flag burning. They decide that terrorists who have been caught in the act of killing and plotting to kill American citizens should be treated well and fed well, but that an American citizen who can not feed herself deserves to starve to death. A court has a right to determine what is and what is not marriage and decide that gender plays no role, but then decides that a man who is living in common law with another woman, and has children by that common law "marriage" can decide the fate of the woman he has abandoned.

How on earth do they expect people to respect the law when there is no commonsense way to understand it?

Our courts are destroying our legal system.

36 posted on 03/23/2005 9:56:43 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson