Skip to comments.
Gospel of Judas back in spotlight after 20 centuries
Middle East Online ^
| 2005-03-30
| Patrick Baert
Posted on 04/04/2005 10:11:49 AM PDT by robowombat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-193 next last
To: AppyPappy
Of course I have "scientific" proof. Why would I have faith in something without evidence?Okay. Let's see your scientific proof that Jesus is the Son of God and that he was resurrected as described in the Bible.
To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Can you prove to me that Julius Caesar was a real person and not the creation of some fevered imagination? Maybe someone faked the tales and others then added him to the scrolls of histories. Maybe others made statues of what he "Might" have looked likeYou miss my point. Re-read the thread.
To: robowombat
Wasn't Judas so consumed by guilt he hanged himself?
When did he have time to write a gospel?
103
posted on
04/04/2005 1:20:40 PM PDT
by
GatorGirl
(Rest in Peace, Holy Father)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
I said I have proof. I didn't say I could show it to you. Every Christian has proof of the existence of Jesus and His Resurrection.
104
posted on
04/04/2005 1:25:41 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: hosepipe
I am not going to bother with much of you post I will let it speak for itself. But on the following:
Re: "Like God could not pick his own leaders and guide the "church" himself.. <<- rhetorical question..
He did in the beginning, and still does.. I think.."
God did pick the leader of his Church. It was Peter and it is clear the other apostles and disciples considered him so. It is in all four Gospels, Acts and even in some of Paul's letters. Remember two of the Gospels were written by a Apostle so if there was any question among them it might have shown itself.
You are correct God continues to guide the Church. The Holy Ghost will be in full force when the conclave meets to select a new Pope. The problem most have is they assume God always picks a saintly man but sometimes it is the weakness of a man that is selected. The failures of man moves us in ways we can not fully understand but God does.
The rest of your post I will leave alone.
To: AppyPappy
I said I have proof. I didn't say I could show it to you. Every Christian has proof of the existence of Jesus and His Resurrection.Like I wrote.
You don't have scientific proof that Jesus is the Son of God or that he was resurrected as it's written in the Bible.
You have faith.
There is a difference, whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.
To: Mark in the Old South
[ I am not going to bother with much of your post I will let it speak for itself. ]
I agree, doing that with you, myself..
You are specifically and exactly where your supposed to be..
I don't have a problem with that..
Actually I was posting for lurkers anyway..
Two monologues does not a conversation make..
107
posted on
04/04/2005 1:33:45 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
You don't have proof that Jesus is the Son of God or that he was resurrected as it's written in the Bible. Yes I do. Otherwise, there would be no reason to believe. You seem to not believe in personal evidence. Do you believe that evidence that cannot be shared is not evidence?
108
posted on
04/04/2005 1:35:56 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: 1stFreedom
That should be Pope Damasus (reigned 366 to 384), not Damascus.
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Can you point me to the scientific proof that Jesus was the Son of God and was resurrected as told in the Bible?,No proof, just evidence. Do you have a proof, your mom is your mom?
110
posted on
04/04/2005 2:17:43 PM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: GatorGirl
And when did Judas have time to learn Coptic?
To: Verginius Rufus
To: hosepipe
According to the Gospel according to St. John, the inscription on the cross was in Hebrew, "Roman," and Greek.
In Acts 21.37, Paul speaks to the Roman tribune ("chiliarch" or commander of 1,000 according to the Greek text) and the tribune responds in surprise, "You know Greek?" so obviously Paul had been speaking to him in Greek.
It was common in that era for educated Romans to be fluent in Greek...they started studying Greek at a young age.
To: Raycpa
Interesting list of dates. Whose dating are you following?
To: Verginius Rufus
Follow links in my posts. The back up is there.
115
posted on
04/04/2005 2:41:45 PM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: robowombat
What information are we burying in sealed containers?
In case the unthinkable does happen. Has anyone thought of burying a Rosetta stone of sorts for future generations (say, 4,000 years from now). Paper decays, electronic info is notorious for becoming unreadable (e.g., format changes - think Edison Cylinders). With modern technology, some etched metal should be relatively cheap.
116
posted on
04/04/2005 2:52:58 PM PDT
by
P.O.E.
To: Raycpa
No proof, just evidence. Do you have a proof, your mom is your momYup. It's called DNA.
Do you have DNA evidence that proves that Jesus is the Son of God?
To: Verginius Rufus
[ It was common in that era for educated Romans to be fluent in Greek...they started studying Greek at a young age. ]
True.
118
posted on
04/04/2005 3:06:08 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed by me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: robowombat
There are many, many gospels around. The strangest one I've read is the "Arabic Gospel of The Infancy" about Jesus' childhood. Google it and you can download the entire thing, it's about 10-15 pages and an amazing read.
119
posted on
04/04/2005 3:06:09 PM PDT
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
To: AppyPappy
Yes I do. Otherwise, there would be no reason to believe. You seem to not believe in personal evidence. Do you believe that evidence that cannot be shared is not evidence?So, now we go from scientific evidence, to "scientific" proof, to personal evidence?
You do not have scientific evidence.
You have faith.
Whether you acknowledge it or not, there is a difference between the two.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-193 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson