Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: Tracking the Ambitions of Karl Rove ("PBS spins a story of astounding stupidity")
New York Times ^ | April 12, 2005 | VIRGINIA HEFFERNAN

Posted on 04/12/2005 5:58:51 AM PDT by OESY

Karl Rove - The Architect," a documentary on PBS tonight, spins a story of astounding stupidity out of a career it insists is among the most influential in American politics. This is unpardonable. To hint at so much intrigue without dramatizing any of it - by hardly offering evidence - is a dereliction of duty; it suggests that even the most tendentious account of Mr. Rove, President Bush's top political adviser, as a redeemer or a rascal might have done his story greater justice.

In harmony with dark synthesizer chords, the narrator speaks in haunted tones about Mr. Rove's "40-year plan to remake the American political landscape." (Mr. Rove is 54.) Talking heads confirm that "Karl Rove wants a permanent Republican majority," "His hand was in all of it," and - more scare chords - "He's the god inside the machine."

He sure sounds terrifying. And indeed, we do learn (shield the kids) that Mr. Rove, from an early age, was a Republican. He liked politics. And he worked to get Republicans elected.

Really, it's chilling.

Pervaded by interviews with reporters from The Washington Post, which joins "Frontline" in presenting the documentary, the program takes its title from Mr. Bush's 2004 victory speech, in which he thanked various advisers, including "the architect, Karl Rove." This workaday figure of speech is treated as an all-revealing slip of the tongue, and the movie goes into overdrive trying to make architecture seem sinister.

Here things get especially comical. Ham-handed still lifes of an architect's paraphernalia - including blueprints, compasses, graph paper - appear as a metonym for the title character. These arrangements are an embarrassment to documentary filmmaking.

The most amateurish among them features a crucifix and a photograph of Mr. Bush on top of a red-brown book, embossed with the words "Holy Bible." Nearby, in the upper right-hand corner of the frame, has been placed a photo of Al Gore, looking chagrined. In the left-hard corner is the scene's sole black and white image: Karl Rove, looking into the middle distance. All this stuff sits atop blueprints. Someone has got to be kidding.

Visual and auditory tricks - this pile-on of scattershot symbolism - are presumably meant to distract from shortcomings in the program's storytelling. In the one and only dramatic sequence, the film stoops to building suspense around the exit-poll snafus in the 2004 presidential election. That those polls erroneously projected John Kerry as the winner may have bugged reporters for a few impatient hours in November, but those glitches amount to almost nothing now - a short, illusory setback for Mr. Rove, who trusted his own favorable data anyway.

Nonetheless, the program dwells on images of Mr. Bush and his family at the polls in Crawford, Tex. The first family looks nervous, we're told: concerned, funereal. (They look like people going to vote.) But Mr. Rove, on the same day, reveals an antic disposition; he hams up a cellphone call with Ed Gillespie, then the Republican Party chairman, and appears confident. The source of Mr. Rove's striking, clownish style is never revealed. (He's also shown dancing around in snow, apparently while campaigning in New England.) Friends tell the camera, instead, that Mr. Rove was always driven and loved to read.

Wayne Slater, a writer for The Dallas Morning News and the co-author of "Bush's Brain," a biography of Mr. Rove, tells one "story" about the strategist as a young man. It's this: As a boy, Mr. Rove had a poster in his room that said, "Wake Up, America."

This is not a story.

Without a narrative, the program turns to haphazard assertions to illuminate the character of Mr. Rove, but even this is mostly speculation or trivia. He grew up "a non-Mormon in the heart of Mormon country," we're told. (What was his religious heritage, then?) Barry Goldwater's campaign - "extremism in defense of liberty," etc. - apparently excited him. And Dan Rather, then the White House correspondent for CBS, gave Mr. Rove his primetime break when he conducted a short interview with him during Richard Nixon's campaign for re-election in 1972.

The Washington Post's Dan Balz, who comes off as the most perceptive reporter on camera here, does present Mr. Rove as a glutton for data: "He loves to be inundated by information." Helpfully, he also explains Mr. Rove's evidently lifelong project of realigning the electorate as incremental, comparing it to the approach of Woody Hayes's old Ohio State football teams: "three yards and a cloud of dust." As career analysis, this is the best the movie has to offer.

These shards are not nearly enough to justify the grandiosity of the narration and the melodramatic mise-en-scène. Only real drama - scenes, in war rooms, of people planning and strategizing - could do that. The story of a plotter that has no plot: it just isn't right.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: balz; bush; gillespie; kerry; pbs; rove; slater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: kcvl

Wow..that Heffernan is some writer. She had a sarcastic dig in practically sentence. I loved it!


21 posted on 04/12/2005 7:06:45 AM PDT by cloud8 (I don’t do carrots. --John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: general_re

yeah,...Time Capsule , in the folder marked USELESS/TIMEWASTERS , and to think we're paying for this


22 posted on 04/12/2005 7:13:49 AM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Phocion
Even the NYT trashes it. Does sound like it could be a fountain of unintentional humor though, kinda like DU.

They don't disagree with the premise - that Rove is the personification of pure distilled evil. They just think it's too hamfisted and crude. It doesn't call Rove Satan with enough subtlety to suit their tastes.

23 posted on 04/12/2005 7:14:12 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC (Ted Kennedy and the New York Times do NOT select our next Pope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OESY
This poor honey doesn't seem to realize that the sole function of the old-timey, neocommunist media in this country is to serve as the propaganda arm of the DNC and to mouth whatever big lies the DNC wants. This month, the old-timey media is attacking any honest Republican who influences leadership. It doesn't require facts, integrity or good judgment and ca, in fact, utilize foreries, lies and few facts.

Why we continue to pay for this crap from PBS is beyond me. The NYT? I don't have to buy it and don't.

24 posted on 04/12/2005 7:25:40 AM PDT by Tacis ( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
She had a sarcastic dig in practically sentence. I loved it!

I liked it, too, and I'm wondering about the kneejerk commentary from some who evidently saw "New York Times" and went into auto-bash mode without reading the piece, or if they did, not getting it.

One of my favorite excerpts:

He sure sounds terrifying. And indeed, we do learn (shield the kids) that Mr. Rove, from an early age, was a Republican. He liked politics. And he worked to get Republicans elected.

Really, it's chilling.

LOL

25 posted on 04/12/2005 7:41:31 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
They don't disagree with the premise

Actually, she does appear to disagree with the premise.

26 posted on 04/12/2005 7:42:21 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Count on the Left to supply the puppets.
27 posted on 04/12/2005 8:08:30 AM PDT by rabidralph (Ahhh, the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Ouch!!

OK, well you can't win them all. I suggest this review is an anomaly, but I might be wrong. I hope everyone watches tonight and lets me know.

I was the Video Editor, and this has been one of the most extreme editing assignments of my career. It is really quite tricky to structure the political biography of Karl Rove inside a historical chronology of the republican party - since Goldwater. Even more tricky when the opening and closing scenes of the documentary are voting day 2004.

I hope you all enjoy the film.


28 posted on 04/12/2005 8:55:23 AM PDT by FilmCutter ( Extremism in the cause of liberty is no vice. - Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
She also holds a doctorate in English literature from Harvard...

No wonder she can use "mise-en-scene" in a sentence.

29 posted on 04/12/2005 8:59:10 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OESY

'Frontline: Karl Rove - The Architect'
PBS, tonight at 9, check local listings.


30 posted on 04/12/2005 6:02:01 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Kunte Klinte
The PBS program on Karl Rove was deficient in several areas. I noted the following:

1. In South Carolina, one galvanizing issue was John McCain's likening George Bush to Bill Clinton. This helped turn off McCain's support within the Republican base leading to Bush's 11-point win. McCain was also pursuing a strategy to build momentum by encouraging Democrats to cross-over in the primaries, though their support could not be sustained and proved illusory. PBS missed these details and recycled the conventional wisdom favorable to McCain.

2. The gay marriage amendment became an issue because of the illegal actions of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom and New Palz (NY) Mayor Jason West, as well as the intervention by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. It was not part of some latent gay-bashing strategy of Rove to turn out "values" voters.

Others may have spotted additional flaws.
31 posted on 04/12/2005 7:13:22 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: OESY

That PeeBS attacks on Rove, Bush and true republicans in general was worse than the PeeBS attacks on the US's worst enemies, Saddam, Kadaffy, Khomenei, etc. Of course, libs love America's enemies and enemies of freedom, so it only fits.


32 posted on 04/12/2005 8:13:16 PM PDT by HighWheeler ("Would I turn on the gas if my pal Mugsy were in there?" "Ehhh, ye might rabbit, ye might." ~ Bugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson