[quidnunc]

Don't even think of carping against, bitching at, sniveling about or mindlessly blovating to the author or me unless you have actually first read the article and understand what is being said. And to save the know-it-alls from making fools of themselves, Professor Gitz is a CONSERVATIVE!

[BenLurkin]

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Rodham Clinton June 2004
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/06/28/politics2238EDT0845.DTL

[dirtboy]

None of which means, of course, that she is likely to win in November, particularly if the Republicans do the smart thing and nominate the obvious Hillary antidote — Condoleezza Rice.

It won't matter who they nominate if they keep alienating their base over illegal immigration.

[Puppage]

Let’s start with what just about everyone already knows — Hillary Clinton.....

....is an evil, socialistic criminal!

[dirtboy]

Expect Hillary’s "Sista Souljah" moment to come early and be repeated often.

It's already started, with Hillary speaking out against garbage on TV.

[gridlock]

Gore ran a campaign sufficiently erratic in 2000, despite the kind of peace and prosperity thought to benefit incumbents, that he lost the White House by a split decision in the Supreme Court.

I know it is like fighting the tide, but I must point out that Al Gore lost because he got fewer votes in Florida. There is not way, under any counting scheme proposed, he would have won in Florida. The 2000 election was not decided by the Supreme Court. Anybody who says so is revealing himself to be an idiot.

[Conspiracy Guy]

A little touchy today?

[Slyfox]

[Beckwith]

I have been tracking the telltales for over a month.

Hillary's not-so-covert campaign

[1Old Pro]

Hillary won't run. If anyone in the Republican party actually believed she was running they would have already begun the attacks on her.

Yet in NY GOP Governor pataki has never said an unkind word about her. GOP NY Rep. Peter King says she delivers for upstate NY. And not a peep from any GOP senators. P A T H E T I C

[shoffma1999]

It does seem that Hillary is going to be the democratic candidate for president next election. However, I pray that republicans do not nominate Rice. HIllary will never win against a male republican like Guliani. I do not mean to be sexist or racist, but few men will vote for Hillary because she is percieved as a huge bitch. If republicans get scared and nominate Rice; I think Hillary will win because many white people are not going to vote for a black woman. If Rice and Clinton are the two candidates for President I believe that there will be a legitimate third party contender, and needless to say the election will be very interesting. I guess we will have to wait and see.

[areafiftyone]

None of which means, of course, that she is likely to win in November, particularly if the Republicans do the smart thing and nominate the obvious Hillary antidote — Condoleezza Rice.

UMMMMM How many times does Condi have to say NO and in how many languages. She is NOT GOING TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT!

[Fudd Fan]

2000 and 2004 were mere warm-ups, folks!

[Archangelsk]

Not since the Democrats re-nominated Adlai Stevenson in 1956 has either of our major parties gone back to the same dry well the next time around

Richard "Dick" (Dick) Nixon. (Don't quibble with the four year hiatus).

[Cyber Liberty]

Hey, I'm just happy to see an actual entire article to read....

[WireAndWood]

Gitz's work is acceptable, but if I never heared the term "blovating" again I'd be quite pleased.

[eskimo]

None of which means, of course, that she is likely to win in November, particularly if the Republicans do the smart thing and nominate the obvious Hillary antidote — Condoleezza Rice.

Here we go again. Those who own and operate the Dem/GOP thing are setting Americans up for another insult an order of magnatude greater than the last few record breakers. Perhaps this insult will drop voter turn-out to single digit percentages as the more rational people will opt out of the farce.