Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"PATRIOT Act Oversight Hearing Tuesday" - Bob Barr, true American patriots, OPPOSE renewal!
http://judiciary.house.gov/ ^ | May 2, 2005 | MagnusMaximus1

Posted on 05/02/2005 7:26:43 PM PDT by MagnusMaximus1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Ramius

Yeah, as far as I know, those records were ALWAYS available by court order. As far as I know--I think I've looked into this more than the average person, but by no means as thoroughly as some--the vast majority of stuff in the Patriot Act is merely assembling laws already out there into a framework of tools to be used to ferret out terrorists AND, more significantly, to update laws about phones and landlines for the cellular age. It's one of those oogah boogah scares that Bob Barr seems to need to make noise about since his career as a politician collapsed. He's one of those advertisements for term limits, as far as I'm concerned.


41 posted on 05/02/2005 9:13:30 PM PDT by Darkwolf (Jean Shepherd audio: http://www.flicklives.com/Mass_Back/mass_back.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: risk

Unfortunately, the financial provisions that were on the police state wish list since day one and opportunistically trotted out on 9/12 don't expire. Only a repeal of the permanent provisions will get rid of them. Don't hold your breath.


42 posted on 05/02/2005 9:13:45 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: agitator
I'm not holding my breath, but I do think it's worth expressing my opinions in public -- and I appreciate your willingness to do the same thing. I want to go on record as saying that I think the PA is well-intentioned but will establish too much state power. We need to control immigration, reestablish our second amendment protections, cut (altogether) any funding to universities that teach anti-Americanism and Marxism, defund our Islamic "allies," and eliminate trade with China. These things would go much further in protecting American security than spying on the American people themselves.
43 posted on 05/02/2005 9:31:25 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: risk

I agree.


44 posted on 05/02/2005 10:45:49 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
more civil rights violations against average americans take place at traffic stops every day then under prosecution with the patriot act.

So that makes it okay?

45 posted on 05/02/2005 10:54:48 PM PDT by Badray (If you don't want to change your mind, at least get some more info and make a new decision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Badray; agitator; Travis McGee; Squantos; ALOHA RONNIE; Alamo-Girl

The best patriot acts we can muster would protect our family values and reignite the desire to raise families we had in the 1950s.


46 posted on 05/02/2005 11:21:48 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: risk

It is on C-Span2, right now.


47 posted on 05/03/2005 7:19:16 AM PDT by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: risk

The patriot act in it's current form is just an........act.


48 posted on 05/03/2005 9:24:30 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Bob Barr works for the ACLU. Who the hell cares what he thinks?

Apparently the management of Free Republic does as they advertise his writings on the top right margin of the forum.

49 posted on 05/03/2005 10:09:45 AM PDT by jmc813 (All I cared about was booze, stock cars and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

"Under the Patriot Act, a search of persons or premises still requires a warrant issued by a judge."

Secret warrants, issued by secret judges, concerning secret material, served by secret LEOs, and if the subject of the warrant finds out, somehow, that they were served and doesn't keep it secret, automatic prison. That's the problem I have with the Unpatriot Act.


50 posted on 05/03/2005 11:24:16 AM PDT by VRing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VRing

Garbage. Anyone who has problems with the Act should have to post the actual woodage they fear. That goes for you.


51 posted on 05/03/2005 11:30:37 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Woodage?


52 posted on 05/03/2005 12:27:28 PM PDT by VRing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Bob Barr works for the ACLU. Who the hell cares what he thinks?

Since When?

53 posted on 05/03/2005 12:32:05 PM PDT by Radioactive (I'm on the radio..so I'm radioactive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Radioactive

Barr went to work for the ACLU as a consultant shortly after he left Congress in 2000.


54 posted on 05/03/2005 12:33:58 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Does it not bother you that the government wants a national ID card...and yet delcares the Minutemen down on the border as outlaw vigalantees and yet leaves the border wide open so terrorists can enter and attack.

We must have an open discussion about the warnings that were given by people in this government which other people in this government ignored that allowed 9/11 to happen.

55 posted on 05/03/2005 12:37:11 PM PDT by Radioactive (I'm on the radio..so I'm radioactive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Radioactive
We must have an open discussion about the warnings that were given by people in this government which other people in this government ignored that allowed 9/11 to happen.

It's been discussed to death. There was no vast conspiracy on the part of the Bush administration to allow 9/11 to happen so an oil pipeline could be built across Afghanistan.

56 posted on 05/03/2005 12:42:13 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Badray

no, it simply tells us where its worth putting our focus. you can tune into most episodes of COPS and see more civil rights violations then the patriot act is causing.


57 posted on 05/03/2005 5:13:07 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: VRing
Secret warrants, issued by secret judges, concerning secret material, served by secret LEOs, and if the subject of the warrant finds out, somehow, that they were served and doesn't keep it secret, automatic prison. That's the problem I have with the Unpatriot Act.

Well... If I believed any of that stuff, I'd have a problem with it too. But nothing there is really true.

58 posted on 05/03/2005 5:38:24 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Radioactive
Does it not bother you that the government wants a national ID card...

No... there's no national ID card (though it might be a useful thing) but rather just standards for state ID's. State ID's are a mess, and there is some good that needs to be done there.

and yet delcares the Minutemen down on the border as outlaw vigalantees

Vigilantes? Well... that's what they are. Not that there's anything wrong with that....

and yet leaves the border wide open so terrorists can enter and attack.

It's not fair to say that the border is wide open. It's not. But there are too many illegals that get across, I agree.

We must have an open discussion about the warnings that were given by people in this government which other people in this government ignored that allowed 9/11 to happen.

"allowed" 9/11 to happen? Please... warnings? Somebody called up and told somebody that 19 terrorists were on such and such flights and they were going to crash them into buildings on the eleventh of september? What that got to do with borders? The hijackers flew into this country on legal visas. They didn't come across with coyotes.

59 posted on 05/03/2005 5:48:39 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Badray; oceanview

If it wasn't for luring gullible people into "consenting" to searches of dubious legality at traffic stops, the solution rate at most PDs would be ZERO.


60 posted on 05/03/2005 6:13:23 PM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson