Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US vowed to come to China's aid against USSR in 1971 crisis
Daily Times, Pakistan ^ | May 08, 2005 | Khalid Hasan

Posted on 05/07/2005 8:34:19 PM PDT by ttsmi

The United States assured China in 1971 after it had encourage it to “menace” India that if the Soviet Union moved against China in support of India, Washington would protect it from the Soviet Union. China, however, chose not to menace India, and the crisis on the subcontinent ended without a confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union.

The papers say that the army crackdown in East Pakistan was “brutal”. The US consulate there reported, “Here in Dacca we are mute and horrified witnesses to a reign of terror by the Pak military.” During the following week, it reported that the army was setting houses on fire and shooting people as they emerged from the burning buildings and that the army had killed a large number of unarmed students at Dacca University. When Nixon was told about it, he said, “I wouldn't put out a statement praising it, but we're not going to condemn it either.” On another occasion he said, “We should just stay out - like in Biafra, what the hell can we do?” Dhaka kept sending cable after cable to Washington about the “indiscriminate killing” of the populace of East Pakistan by the army, but Nixon maintained his original position, saying, “The people who bi.ch about Vietnam bit.h about it because we intervened in what they say is a civil war. Now some of the same bas.ards ... want us to intervene here - both civil wars.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailytimes.com.pk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: 1971; bangladesh; china; geopolitics; india; southasia; usa; ussr

1 posted on 05/07/2005 8:34:19 PM PDT by ttsmi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ttsmi

Dick Nixon was another one of these guys who's too smart, or who puts too much faith in being smart and not enough in being righteous.


2 posted on 05/07/2005 8:37:47 PM PDT by tahotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tahotdog
Dick Nixon was another one of these guys who's too smart, or who puts too much faith in being smart and not enough in being righteous.

He was dealing with a weak hand then, and had gotten jaded from the vicious criticism. Still, he never tried to sell out Israel for Arab oil.
3 posted on 05/07/2005 8:49:38 PM PDT by kenavi ("Remember, your fathers sacrificed themselves without need of a messianic complex." Ariel Sharon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tahotdog

Or maybe so smart he acts foolish.


4 posted on 05/07/2005 9:28:17 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear tipped ICBMs: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kenavi

He sold the American people out. The really big screwup of the Nixon administration was allowing and possibly causing the formation of OPEC. It didn't have to happen.


5 posted on 05/07/2005 9:39:30 PM PDT by tahotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ttsmi

LIFE is such that it is always easy to critisize ON HINDSIGHT

It is the critical person who has to make the critical decision on that critical moment, who has to answer to HISTORY. Therefore a man who is prepared to assume the role of the President, must be prepared to face the music

Having said that, it is still the birth-right of every individual to critisize, and this cannot be taken away

Nobody is perfect

you cannot please everybody

"What,? me worry ? " Elmer Funt


6 posted on 05/07/2005 9:47:23 PM PDT by Wudan Master
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wudan Master

The feedback on the situation in Bangladesh was available to Nixon REALTIME from no other person than his own embassy - but he and Kissinger were so blinded by their need to befriend China that they chose to ignore it. I was a part of the Indian Army whch went into Bangladesh and, let me tell you, we truly liberated the people there - and we were really pissed when we learnt of the USS Enterprise making its threatening foray into the Bay of Bengal


7 posted on 05/07/2005 11:06:09 PM PDT by ttsmi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ttsmi

I think a Soviet nuke sub was following the USS Enterprise, back then.


8 posted on 05/07/2005 11:43:55 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Hm, actually, Soviet subs and surface ships followed US carrier groups whenever it was possible at all.


9 posted on 05/08/2005 1:32:32 AM PDT by DYR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: ttsmi

Well done in 71, and welcome to FR.


11 posted on 05/08/2005 4:09:11 AM PDT by razoroccam (Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ttsmi

That is a very interesting article. Thanks for posting it. I'm not sure what to think about it because I'm not too familiar with the background info of this time period, specifically what was going on in east pakistan.

Wasn't India a Democracy at this time? It seems strange to be backing the Communist Chinese and Pakistanis.

I'm glad this tinderbox stayed at least relatively under control.


12 posted on 05/08/2005 6:01:40 AM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/charterschoolsexplained.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

The 'Grand Strategy', perhaps?


13 posted on 05/08/2005 6:06:09 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ttsmi


Historically, Pakistan had been an ally of the US against the USSR, since the 1950s,

Pakistan was a key member of CENTO, formed by the US to contain the USSR in that region of the World. CENTO consisted of Britain, Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Pakistan and was formed to counter the USSR


14 posted on 05/08/2005 7:47:20 AM PDT by Wudan Master
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ttsmi

I would have let both russia and china nuke eachother. Two less enemies to deal with.


15 posted on 05/08/2005 4:10:26 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DYR
Hm, actually, Soviet subs and surface ships followed US carrier groups whenever it was possible at all.

At the same time one of our subs always followed soviet subs.

16 posted on 05/08/2005 4:11:39 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
I would have let both russia and china nuke eachother. Two less enemies to deal with.

And one major enemy more, in the near vicinity, in the form of globe-trotting radioactive dust.

17 posted on 05/08/2005 7:43:53 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
And one major enemy more, in the near vicinity, in the form of globe-trotting radioactive dust.

Lots of radioactive dust was emitted when both us and the russians tested nukes during the cold war. Yet Nevada is still habited, most of the Pacific Islands are still habited. More still if you add India's and Pakistan's and france's testint. Over 3,000 total test detonations occured during that period.

18 posted on 05/09/2005 12:23:58 AM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson