Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newsweek Told Koran Flush Story Was 'Slam Dunk'
Scrapple Face ^ | 5/16/05 | Scott Ott

Posted on 05/16/2005 11:37:33 AM PDT by pookie18

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: pookie18
"If there's a bright side to this story," said Mr. Whitaker. "At least our anonymous sources are safe, unharmed. And of course, our advertisers now know that Newsweek has great credibility in the Arab world, despite the bad feelings that Muslims have about America in general."

Outrageous statements!

21 posted on 05/16/2005 11:53:09 AM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delacoert

Oops. Scrappleface. :/


22 posted on 05/16/2005 11:54:11 AM PDT by delacoert (imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy
It is clear their editorial staff consists of complete morons. Even the famous Isakoff should have known better--A whole big book down a toilet?! ---Pleeeeeessse!!!!

In Spikey's defense, he only reads comic books...

23 posted on 05/16/2005 11:54:52 AM PDT by pookie18 (Clinton Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
"An unnamed former top government official told a Newsweek magazine reporter that his story, about a U.S. military guard at Guantanamo prison flushing a Koran down a toilet, was "a slam dunk,""

OK, Newsweek, then slam-dunk it !!!! We're waiting. People are dying.

24 posted on 05/16/2005 11:55:42 AM PDT by cookcounty ("We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts" ---Abe Lincoln, 1858.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Oh, I bought it! I'm no better that Issakoff!!!!


25 posted on 05/16/2005 11:56:40 AM PDT by cookcounty ("We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts" ---Abe Lincoln, 1858.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
For those unschooled in professional journalistic ethics, Mr. Whitaker explained that a retraction demands a higher standard of evidence than an ordinary news item.

So you can report something as fact that isn't with a lower threshold than you can't report something saying you were WRONG?? Yea... that makes a lot of sense....

Here's the truth, even if the story was 100% true, newsweek editors should have known better than to publish such a story at a time of war, knowing it would incite passions and undermine war efforts! Amazing these folks thing we can't handle 9/11 footage, but hey, run with a Quran flushing story uncoberated...

26 posted on 05/16/2005 11:57:10 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

"Unfortunately, quite a few FReepers believe this to be real..."

I didn't know there were that many liberal Freepers. . .

(Incoming!! Donning flame-proof clothing.)


27 posted on 05/16/2005 11:57:13 AM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
aw geez! This reads like a variation on cBS's handling of Rathergate ...... along the lines of: Hey, just because we can't prove that the statement is true and/or valid doesn't mean we don't stand behind it!
28 posted on 05/16/2005 11:58:46 AM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

Latest I heard was it was one of the terrorist trying to clog his toilet, so he used his own Koran to do it.


29 posted on 05/16/2005 11:59:46 AM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
Unfortunately, quite a few FReepers believe this to be real...

Scott Ott has a knack for making his satire almost too believable...

30 posted on 05/16/2005 12:00:16 PM PDT by kevkrom ("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -- Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SaveTheChief

Of course that's about ninety percent of all news nowadays.


31 posted on 05/16/2005 12:01:37 PM PDT by jpl (The modern mainstream news: "fake, but accurate".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
aw geez! This reads like a variation on cBS's handling of Rathergate ...... along the lines of: Hey, just because we can't prove that the statement is true and/or valid doesn't mean we don't stand behind it!

Fake...but accurate! ;-)


32 posted on 05/16/2005 12:01:53 PM PDT by pookie18 (Clinton Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SaveTheChief

The legacy of "Deep Throat".


33 posted on 05/16/2005 12:02:41 PM PDT by tertiary01 (Help.....I'm a victim of Mexican imperialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

"In an effort to help in the grieving process, the magazine's publisher said that immediate family members of the dead would receive a free 90-day trial subscription to Newsweek."

Blahahaha!

I believe Newsweek might try this new marketing idea.


34 posted on 05/16/2005 12:05:36 PM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

BarfWeek should be flushed.


35 posted on 05/16/2005 12:08:24 PM PDT by xcamel (Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
Newsweek's next course of action will be to hire an in-house lawyer to "investigate" how they got the story wrong.The final report will state NO political bias against this administration, just a rush to print the facts.

Besides, the story can't be shown to be false when Newsweek feels the facts are "false but accurate."

36 posted on 05/16/2005 12:09:27 PM PDT by builder (I don't want a piece of someone else's pie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

"Mr. Whitaker explained that a retraction demands a higher standard of evidence than an ordinary news item."

But of course, there is no standard of evidence to print a story in the first place.


37 posted on 05/16/2005 12:13:27 PM PDT by ArmedNReady (Islam, The Cancer on Humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

"You don't just rush to press with a retraction until you nail down the facts"

How about not rushing to press with a story till you have the facts, you jackass????


38 posted on 05/16/2005 12:14:09 PM PDT by NRA1995 (John Edwards: "Mah daddy worked in a MEEL")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

I know it's from Scrapple face but I really really do hope that this incident is the end of Newsweak!


39 posted on 05/16/2005 12:15:14 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Is this article for real? I find it hard to believe that anyone could make a "Let them eat Cake" statement like this.

Send the families a free 90 subscription? Is this arrogance or what? If it is true and this is Newsweek's attitude towards lies and people dying then the MSM is even more corrupt and seditious than I thought.


40 posted on 05/16/2005 12:16:07 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson