Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Words lead to violence, judge says
Houston Chronicle (houston comical) ^ | 05/19/2005 | Rebeccaa Carroll

Posted on 05/19/2005 11:17:07 AM PDT by cbkaty

May 18, 2005, 11:06PM

Words lead to violence, judge says

Woman whose family was slain urges Congress to bring an end to verbal attacks

By REBECCA CARROLL

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - A federal judge whose husband and mother were slain by a disgruntled litigant urged Congress Wednesday to help bring an end to "truly dangerous" verbal attacks on judges that might lead to violent action.

Judge Joan Humphrey Lefkow said one way lawmakers could protect judges would be to condemn judge-bashing remarks by commentators and colleagues.

"Fostering disrespect for judges can only encourage those that are on the edge, or on the fringe, to exact revenge," Lefkow told the Senate Judiciary Committee.

"I understand that Congress cannot eradicate violence against judges ... " she said. "But as I replay in my mind the events that led to our tragedy, I believe that several things might have prevented it and could prevent it from happening to even one more of our judges."

Lefkow also called on Congress to increase funding for the U.S. Marshals Service, which protects judges.

Lefkow was appointed in 2000 to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois by former President Clinton.

Several Republican members of Congress have lashed out at judges involved in the Terri Schiavo case and others. Schiavo, a brain-damaged Florida woman, died after her feeding tube was removed.

"This loss happened because our legal system did not protect the people who need protection most, and that will change," House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, had said. "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; clinton; firstamendment; freedom; freedomofspeech; judge; judiciary; lefkow; no1stwithoutthe2nd; speech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Well....the first drumbeat...
1 posted on 05/19/2005 11:17:08 AM PDT by cbkaty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
A judge who never heard of the First Amendment.

Who'd have thunk it?

2 posted on 05/19/2005 11:18:47 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Controlled substance laws created the federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
Doggone shame about Judge Lefkow's family, but I doubt that turning America into a fascist state would have saved them. She'd still made the same rulings and the litigant would have still been gunning for her.

I think we're better off with a free America and Judge Lefkow stepping down from the bench now that she appears to have lost her nerve completely.

It'd be for the best ~ maybe even for the children.

3 posted on 05/19/2005 11:19:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

My goodness. The only judge bashing I've heard lately has been by the Dumbocrap Sinators lashing out at any judge who might hold an anti-abortion stance.

What's the penalty for sinators bashing judges?


4 posted on 05/19/2005 11:20:38 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

thought police at it again


5 posted on 05/19/2005 11:21:19 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

Wow. My sympathy for this individual is evaporating.


6 posted on 05/19/2005 11:21:49 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She probably hasn't heard of the 2nd Amendment either.


7 posted on 05/19/2005 11:22:05 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

Start stocking up on tinfoil...


8 posted on 05/19/2005 11:22:23 AM PDT by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

Actually, I think judicial activism leading to anti-majority interpretation of law leads to more violence.

Not saying Lefkow is guilty of this, but 1st amendments rights apply to everyone. Big Brother can kiss my behind.


9 posted on 05/19/2005 11:22:45 AM PDT by wvobiwan (United Nations = World-wide Criminal Organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

Judicial tyranny leads to violence. Just wait and see.


10 posted on 05/19/2005 11:22:46 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

I'm very sorry about what happened to her family, but I don't think that judges need to be any more elite than they already are. There is a great deal of unaccountable judicial tyranny in our country already; the last thing we need is to make it a crime to complain about it.

This is a typical clintonoid appointment.


11 posted on 05/19/2005 11:22:47 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

Quite true.


12 posted on 05/19/2005 11:22:59 AM PDT by TheDon (Euthanasia is an atrocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
Funny how the article refers only to Republicans criticizing judges... IMHO, the article made very little sense whatsoever.
13 posted on 05/19/2005 11:23:07 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes (News junkie here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sorry about her family, but the guy who went on the rampage had no connections to Republicans whatsoever.


14 posted on 05/19/2005 11:23:19 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

The body count:

People killed by liberal journalism: 17
People killed by conservatives criticizing judges: 0


15 posted on 05/19/2005 11:23:21 AM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Just now occurred to me but the words that set off the defendant were hers!!!!

Must mean that she killed her mother and husband. Time to shut her up FUR SHUR.

16 posted on 05/19/2005 11:24:55 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

So, like the Dems calling the Republicans nazis and Bush Hitler is ok, huh?


17 posted on 05/19/2005 11:25:20 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("If Love Can't Buy You Happiness, You Don't Know Where To Shop")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"But as I replay in my mind the events that led to our tragedy, I believe that several things might have prevented it and could prevent it from happening to even one more of our judges."

One of the several "things" would be self defense? But that is what they have the Marshals for. It is very sad what happened to her family but her regard for the 1st Amendment shows her thoughts on the 2nd even after this tragedy. People like her are what the brady bunch look for. rant off.

18 posted on 05/19/2005 11:26:35 AM PDT by beltfed308
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty

I'm sorry for what happens to judges because of violence as much as I am sorry for innocent people who are victims of violence. However, judges are not a higher form of life here on earth and some may be responsible for escalating violence. I will criticize judges like I criticize politicians anytime I feel they need to be criticized.


19 posted on 05/19/2005 11:27:05 AM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
Lets see, it was a judge who first brought forth the idea of the seperation of church and state, where one can no longer express any religious views in any type of public forum.

And now this judge, who complained that people said negative things about the judge in the Terry Schiavo case, shouldn't be allowed to say things like that. Its a danger to society.

Heck, all there doing is legislating against anybody and anything that disagrees with them.

Yep, its starting to sound like communist China and Russia, and Nazi Germany.

And yesterday I read some guy in Canada was fined $17,500, because he expressed his views, backed by facts, against homosexuality. And 4 butt bumpers and carpet lickers had their feelings hurt.

It won't take much of a stretch to get us to where Canada is today.

And it won't take much to get Canada to where China is, and Nazi Germany was.

How long will it take, if this judge has her way for a new law, before we will be considered criminals just for expressing our discenting viewpoints on this forum?

20 posted on 05/19/2005 11:36:03 AM PDT by mountn man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson