Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9 Senators Hold the Key to the Constitutional Option.
5/19/05 | moose2004

Posted on 05/19/2005 2:16:18 PM PDT by moose2004

9 Republicans Who Will Make or Break the Constitutional Option Vote


TOPICS: US: Arizona; US: Maine; US: Nebraska; US: Ohio; US: Pennsylvania; US: Rhode Island; US: South Carolina; US: Virginia; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chafee; dewine; filibuster; hagel; johnwarner; lindsaygraham; mccain; mccrook; olympiasnowe; specter; susancollins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
There are 9 Republican Senators who hold the balance power with respect to the Constitutional option vote. They are:

John McCain, Chuck Hagel, Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, Mike Dewine, Lincoln Chafee, John Warner, Lindsay Graham, and Arlen Specter

Frist must convince at least 5 of the 9 to vote for the Constitutional option or the vote will not succeed. I strongly favor eliminating the filibuster, but I fear that we don't have those 5 votes yet, getting them will be very difficult, and because of that a compromise may be coming.

1 posted on 05/19/2005 2:16:20 PM PDT by moose2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Actually, he would only need to convince four of them, since losing five votes would mean 50, and Cheney breaks ties.


2 posted on 05/19/2005 2:18:09 PM PDT by TheBigB ("You should meet MY boss. He'd turn Buddha into a chain smoker."~the wit and wisdom of Carl Kolchak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

I'm surprised Graham is a tossup. He would get hammered in SC if he stopped this. The rest are complete RINO's... good luck getting even one of them. Specter seemed like a maybe though.


3 posted on 05/19/2005 2:19:25 PM PDT by Betaille
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

That reads like a who's who list of RINOs.


4 posted on 05/19/2005 2:19:46 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
I don't think we really need to worry about whether or not the DEMONrats can fillibuster. If we lose the vote to have a straight up or down vote on nominees, Frist needs to bring the names to the floor of the Senate and make the DEMONrats actually shut down business by talking nonsense for days or weeks. I doubt the public will stand for weeks on end of nothing being done just to block voting on appointments.
5 posted on 05/19/2005 2:20:40 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille

You can probably get Warner and DeWine, but do you trust Voinovich?


6 posted on 05/19/2005 2:21:41 PM PDT by rushmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
What a ghastly crew! DeWine better get with it, or he'll be another Voinovich.
7 posted on 05/19/2005 2:21:43 PM PDT by IrishGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
Don't make me invoke "Scottish law"!

8 posted on 05/19/2005 2:22:06 PM PDT by evets (God bless President Bush and VP Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Each and every defector should have every possible privilege stripped from them immediately, and the hardest of hardball played to drum them out of the GOP. These fifth-columnists do more damage as GOP members than they would as Democrats (or Socialists, which is what they really are).


9 posted on 05/19/2005 2:22:47 PM PDT by thoughtomator (A government-funded artist is an incompetent whore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betaille

If any of them don't vote for the right way, Frist could strip them of all their committee assignments. Perhaps, he needs to do it anyway if they are even considering wavering.


10 posted on 05/19/2005 2:22:57 PM PDT by rollin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rushmom

Hopefully alot of them are involved in the negotiations and will vote with the Republicans if the Dems won't come to an agreement.


11 posted on 05/19/2005 2:23:10 PM PDT by Betaille
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
I know of one I'll be watching.

John Warner.

If he doesn't support allowing a vote on the judicial appointments I'll be voting against him in the primaries(I normally don't even vote in primaries). If he makes it to the general election I would almost vote for Micheal Moore for senate if he moved to VA in place of Warner if he wants to cave in like this.

I'll be seeing to it people I know are also aware of this.

12 posted on 05/19/2005 2:23:22 PM PDT by KoRn (~Halliburton Told Me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

I look at that list and I think the easiest to convince would be Graham, Warner and DeWine.

Then I think that Snowe, Hagel or McCain would be the next likely candidates.

I hate to be an arm-twister but some of these Senators should be made to realize that future judicial recommendations from them will go absolutely nowhere unless they agree to the nuclear option.


13 posted on 05/19/2005 2:24:00 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
According to Rush there was a period in our history when breaking a filibuster required a 2/3 vote of those in attendance.

I say go back to that and keep them all chained in their chairs for weeks on end. In recent heistory we've only seen faux filibusters -- just the threat of a filibuster is enough to make business grind t a halt. Let's have a real filibuster and seperate the sheep from the goats.

14 posted on 05/19/2005 2:24:02 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rollin

I think every one of these senators needs a primary challenge backed by the entire republican establishment including the white house. I can't think of a single issue on which this bunch vote with the Republicans.


15 posted on 05/19/2005 2:24:26 PM PDT by Betaille
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

You're right, I stand corrected, but I think convincing 4 of these RINO's is going to be a tough task. This is why I fear a compromise might be coming.


16 posted on 05/19/2005 2:26:32 PM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Betaille
Graham is the one who wanted to raise the payroll tax ceiling from 90,000.00 to 200,000.00.

The more he speaks, the more it is obvious he is no conservative.

17 posted on 05/19/2005 2:28:36 PM PDT by teenyelliott (Soylent green is made of liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Actually, the fear at the moment is that if Frist can't get to 50, many would start changing their votes. In other words, either it comes out 50-50, or Frist loses 30-70 or 25-75.


18 posted on 05/19/2005 2:28:40 PM PDT by mdwakeup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

To call for a vote in the middle of a debate would require unanimous consent. So this would not change things.


19 posted on 05/19/2005 2:30:12 PM PDT by mdwakeup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Betaille

I agree, I thought Graham was a conservative, but he's turned out to be nothing more than John McCain, Jr.


20 posted on 05/19/2005 2:30:27 PM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson