Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: EveningStar
Black robed inmates running the asylum
imo
2 posted on
05/23/2005 9:59:27 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
To: EveningStar
And the Supreme Court continues it's journey off planet Earth, last spotted approaching the Horsehead Nebula.
3 posted on
05/23/2005 10:00:34 AM PDT by
visualops
(visualops.com)
To: EveningStar
And the guy that overpowered the guards, shot a few, and managed to get out of an Alanta court house is what? A fluke?
4 posted on
05/23/2005 10:02:43 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: EveningStar
Considering what happened in Atlanta a couple of months ago, this decision makes a lot of sense, oh, yeah!!!
6 posted on
05/23/2005 10:03:13 AM PDT by
Txsleuth
(Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
To: EveningStar
IIRC, there was just a case where a murder defendant - who had been released from his shackles and was in a cell - got a deputy's gun and killed a number of people. Anybody remember the details?
7 posted on
05/23/2005 10:04:04 AM PDT by
livius
To: EveningStar
I suppose a red laser dot on the chest is out, also?
8 posted on
05/23/2005 10:04:14 AM PDT by
dts32041
(Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
To: EveningStar
Let me get this straight .... he was shackled at his SENTENCING? This means ... ummmmm ... the jury already found him guilty?
from the article: Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the majority, said that shackling indicates to juries "that court authorities consider the offender a danger to the community."
"It also almost inevitably affects adversely the jury's perception of the character of the defendant," he wrote.
just d*mn. Seems like the jury already gave their perception of the defendant.
9 posted on
05/23/2005 10:04:20 AM PDT by
RightField
(The older you get ... the older "old" is !)
To: EveningStar
This technique was just tried in Atlanta, Georgia. The happy unshackled defendent shot the judge and other court officials dead.
11 posted on
05/23/2005 10:05:06 AM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
To: EveningStar
Since the issue seems to be that seeing the defendant in chains and shackles makes him appear dangerous to jurors, how about we just wire the felons with 50 or so seperate taser receptors (discreetly hiding under their shirt, of course) and arm the bailiff and guards with remote trigger mechanisms.
15 posted on
05/23/2005 10:09:14 AM PDT by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: EveningStar
Can we put them in a big Lucite box instead then?
To: EveningStar
Doesn't the fact that the defendant has been arrested and charged with a crime serve to prejudice the jury? The Supreme Court is being too clever by half.
To: All
"The decision left room for court personnel to handcuff or chain defendants, but only if they pose a special security risk."
***
Hate to tell the justices, but ALL of the defendants pose a special security risk.
To: EveningStar
Put them in a (bullet proof) glass case. Elevator access from basement. We'll do it for their safety, to remove any negatives.
BTW, "The man in the glass booth" was a very good movie.
26 posted on
05/23/2005 10:21:24 AM PDT by
FatherofFive
(Choose life!)
To: EveningStar
The socialist thought process continues to amaze me. Simply amazing.
30 posted on
05/23/2005 10:25:10 AM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(Islam, the religion of violence; democrats, lovers of Islam and abortion.)
To: EveningStar
The Republicans could not have asked for a better timing of the release of this decision.
To: EveningStar
This one is simple. Two officers, both with remote controls and located at opposite ends of the courtroom, and a remote controlled shock belt on the defendant. He even twitches wrong, and zap (or zot as one prefers), one incapacitated dirtbag.
Top sends
35 posted on
05/23/2005 10:26:56 AM PDT by
petro45acp
(SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG!!!!)
To: EveningStar
Which Euroweenie country did they get THAT ruling from?
These people are effin nutz.
36 posted on
05/23/2005 10:27:00 AM PDT by
Adder
(Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
To: EveningStar
Deck was convicted of killing James Long, 69, and his wife, Zelma, 67, near De Soto, Mo., in 1996. He went to the elderly couple's door asking for directions, but once inside shot them both twice in the head and stole about $400.I don't know why anyone would consider him dangerous.
To: EveningStar
Oh, here's a great idea. F-ing morons.
To: EveningStar
NO!!
After what happened in Atlanta they can still make that decision?
When you're up on a capital murder charge, you don't have a lot to lose and it's a matter of time before there's more violence in the courtroom.
48 posted on
05/23/2005 10:36:09 AM PDT by
Peach
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson