Skip to comments.
Senate Roll Vote on Filibuster Fight
The Washington Post ^
| May 24, 2005
| AP
Posted on 05/24/2005 12:03:34 PM PDT by carolinacrazy
Democrats No
Biden, Del.; Boxer, Calif.; Cantwell, Wash.; Corzine, N.J.; Dayton, Minn.; Dodd, Conn.; Dorgan, N.D.; Feingold, Wis.; Kennedy, Mass.; Kerry, Mass.; Lautenberg, N.J.; Levin, Mich.; Lincoln, Ark.; Murray, Wash.; Reed, R.I.; Sarbanes, Md.; Stabenow, Mich.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 109th; avalanche; eightyonetoeighteen; filibuster; hanoijohnny; judiciary; landslide; lurch; pickledkennedy; rollcall; ussenate; wrongwaykerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Admin Moderator
Republicans are the party of religious fundamentalism. In the United States is called values, in the mid-east it's called terrorism...Mr. Moderator, could we please let this troll stick around? It's so much fun to watch neurotic libs sputter around like this.
21
posted on
05/24/2005 12:38:17 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: inquest
Oh well, too late...
22
posted on
05/24/2005 12:38:50 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: carolinacrazy
Gee! Priscilla Owen is such a "radical right wing idealogue", yet 26 dems voted for her anyway.
To: Pessimist
yet 26 dems voted for her anyway. Actually, they have not yet officially voted on her approval. I believe that many of these 26 will vote against her when the time comes.
24
posted on
05/24/2005 1:00:54 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
('Well, a Democratic socialist ...is basically a liberal Democrat' - Howard Dean - DNC Chairman)
To: OldFriend
"I thought I heard Dodd say AYE on the vote?"
I think you are right. I definitely heard Sarbanes announced as voting Yes, but later in the roll call I heard him listed as voting No. Apparently Senators can announce a vote and then change it as long as votes are still being taken.
25
posted on
05/24/2005 1:11:58 PM PDT
by
Stirner
To: Stirner
Doubtful that the info on this thread is correct.
26
posted on
05/24/2005 1:40:02 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
To: Stirner
Apparently Senators can announce a vote and then change it as long as votes are still being taken.Yes, I've seen that happen before, too.
27
posted on
05/24/2005 1:44:28 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: Ragnorak
not only hilly, but leahy while "jumpin jim" voted no.he really was some republican!
28
posted on
05/24/2005 2:21:34 PM PDT
by
aumrl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson