For me, it began with She-Ra, Princess of Power. If only the First Amendment had been repealed way back then, I could have been saved :(
Posted on 05/24/2005 1:42:28 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Great one! You can't argue with some people, they are totally closed to rational thought.
Didn't Dr. Laura pose for porn? I'm kidding, I like Dr. Laura! I haven't read the book so I can't comment but my husband tells me for him sex is the cure all for everything. Bad moods, bad back, headache, stress and sometimes if he really wants it - he'll pay me ;)
No, it actually isn't like that at all.
In reality, you and I are going to die, that is the extreme absolute.
Yes, indeedy. That appears to be an extreme absolute! We should all strive to live a life that will be deemed worth living when that day comes.
Generally, they have pictures of one or more legal adults participating in activities that they consented to, while being photographed and videotaped, again with their consent.
I honestly don't think I've ever seen a porn site pandering to children, much less trying to get them to follow them to their van. Remember, most pornographers are in it for the money, that's it. Trying to attract customers under 21 would be an invitation for legal action, which hurts the bottom line. Predators that try to lure children tend to use chat rooms, web sites leave too much of a trail.
Was she for it or against it?
Well, at least we can agree with one thing
Yes! Can you feel the love?? =)
For me, it began with She-Ra, Princess of Power. If only the First Amendment had been repealed way back then, I could have been saved :(
I think he meant with the intent to commit adultery with her.
Any thread on porn draws the perverts who defend it, and it is almost impossible to have an interliigent discussion on porn on FR for the addicts that quickly show up, flapping their leathern wings, to make snide, clever remarks, deride, make fun, indulge in circular arguments and in general force people who want to have an intelligent discussion on the matter to deal with them.
Porn is an addiction. Addicts are ashamed of it. They try to cover up. They try to both justify and conceal, which is what all of these people who are pro-porn are doing on this thread. I've seen it ever since I have been on FR
Quote (Cause I dont know how to put italics)
This statement has so many logical flaws it's difficult to know where to begin. First of all, the speaker personalizes the statement: "I've never met ..." I don't know who the speaker has met and who he hasn't. I don't know how many -- if any -- police officers he's met or who's investigated a pedophile. And even if the number is significant, it doesn't qualify as any kind of benchmark.
Secondly, and most egregiously, is the specious causal link. Since all these officers investigating pedophiles found pornography, pornography and pedophilia must somehow be linked. Of course, the implication is that pornography somehow causes pedophilia. If the opposite inference were to be drawn, then the speaker would be indicting pedophilia, not pornography.
Finally, the fact that pornography is "always on the scene" is a meaningless generality. What constitutes pornography, for starters? And what does it mean to be "on the scene?" In the same house? Lying all over the floor? Cut and taped to walls? Hidden in underwear drawers? I'll bet 90 percent of households in the US have some kind of "pornography" "on the scene."
These feeble attempts to make pornography a sickness do nothing but discredit their authors.
Talk about circular arguments.......
Thre truth is that men's biology is such that a normal male always wants sex and thinks about it all the time. Physically, it is an always present urge, that's reality.
For women, its hard to understand that about men because their biology is different.
Case in point, a friend of mine was on a dry spell with his wife and the grandparents were bugging him to give them a grandkid. They were akll driving home from a party and he was feeling frisky. It was like 10:00 at night and he sensed that his wife was getting a we bit tired. The in-laws stopped at 7-11 for something. He went in and got everyone the Starbucks double shot of espresso, in a sneaky attempt to wake his wife up for sex later on. The mother-in law said to him in front of wife "You are trying to get laid arn't you?" He was mortified but responded "You do want a grandkid right???"
Nothing against Dobson, but Bundy told Dobson everything Dobson wanted to hear, so Dobson believed it.
CHILD porn or legal porn? There is a difference.
damn well said.
That statement is false. Porn can be addictive, but it is not inherently an addiction.
Addicts are ashamed of it.
Actually, I see a whole lot of shamelessness in this thread! I certainly am not ashamed of anything here.
They try to cover up.
Cover what up?
Yes.
They know it's wrong.
If these folks truly believed porn *isn't* wrong they'd have no problem "enjoying" it in front of their children and grandchildren.
But porn is something to hide, because of the immorality of using it and the guilt that inevitably follows.
That's what I meant indeed. I would never cheat as I love her more than anyone on this planet and am in every way attracted to her, physically and emotionally. She knows it too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.