Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

llinois House rejects assault weapon ban
Chicago Defender ^ | May 25, 2005 | Christopher Wills

Posted on 05/25/2005 7:38:50 AM PDT by holymoly

SPRINGFIELD – Illinois lawmakers narrowly rejected a proposed ban on assault weapons and .50-caliber rifles Tuesday amid intense lobbying by both sides in the debate.

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley has repeatedly called for stronger gun control measures. Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a fellow Chicago Democrat, got personally involved by calling lawmakers and distributing videos demonstrating the firepower of assault weapons.

The National Rifle Association argued that the proposed ban was too broad and would ban weapons used by hunters, target-shooters and collectors as well.

Rep. Edward Acevedo, a Chicago police officer, denied his legislation would have a broad impact. He said it contains specific exceptions that narrow it to weapons with more sinister uses. "I believe these weapons are made for mass destruction and war," said Acevedo, a Democrat.

He and the governor's office intend to continue pushing for a ban.

The measure also targeted .50-caliber rifles, which critics say have the power and range to punch through body armor, kill someone from a mile away or even bring down an airplane as it takes off or lands.

Rep. Lovana “Lou” Jones (D-26th) said weapons have little to do with the problems of drugs and poor schools that plague her constituents. Echoing the comments of gun-control opponents, she questioned whether a ban would actually keep the weapons off the street.

"That's a wasted vote as far as I'm concerned because nothing's going to stop them from making them," Jones said, "and as long as they make them, people are going to buy them."

Assault weapons were banned by federal law until last year.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: ban; bang; banglist; banguns; control; firearm; gun; illinois; murderers; notprolife; republicankillers; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a fellow Chicago Democrat, got personally involved by calling lawmakers and distributing videos demonstrating the firepower of assault weapons.

I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts these videos showed fully-automatic weapons, and not the semi-automatic firearms which would have been banned.

1 posted on 05/25/2005 7:38:52 AM PDT by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Just more proof that liberals do not have much to do with themselves these days -- other than infringe upon the rights of law abiding citizens. It is politically tough being irrelevant....


2 posted on 05/25/2005 7:40:42 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

These people are so incredibly stupid; Chicago is the friggin' murder capitol of the US and GUNS ARE ILLEGAL. Why won't one friggin' lazy, liberal reporter ask Daley about this?

The definitions lawmakers use for these guns are so misleading; what ends up happening is that law-abiding citizens get screwed. The criminals ignore the law and get the weapons anyway.

I hope Blago and Daley rot in jail. Both are total scum.


3 posted on 05/25/2005 7:43:55 AM PDT by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
"I believe these weapons are made for mass destruction and war," said Acevedo, a Democrat.

Which of course are the exact weapons that the Second Amendment was written to protect, you RAT!

4 posted on 05/25/2005 7:45:16 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("We, the people, are the...masters of...the courts..." -Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Chicago Mayor Richard Daley has repeatedly called for stronger gun control measures.

Asking for stricter gun control in Illinois is a bit like asking for stricter gun control in the UK -- there's not much room to maneuver.

5 posted on 05/25/2005 7:45:23 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GianniV
Why won't one friggin' lazy, liberal reporter ask Daley about this?

Cause they don't want to end up wearing concrete shoes at the bottom of Lake Michigan?

6 posted on 05/25/2005 7:49:35 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
How dare the legislature deny Prince Richard anything.

Don't they know he owns the state of Illinois and all his subjects ?
7 posted on 05/25/2005 7:53:23 AM PDT by TYVets (God so loved the world he didn't send a committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: holymoly
Rep. Edward Acevedo, a Chicago police officer,....

Why do I get the feeling he's taking a double-dip?

9 posted on 05/25/2005 7:55:32 AM PDT by steveegg (Will the "extraordinary" line have the name Owen, Brown or Pryor attached to it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redneckhardhead
Good. Let them be afraid. They KNOW that what they are doing is both anti-Constitution and anti-American. Let them fear. They have very good reason to be.

I hope none of these bans go through as I was planning on my next firearms purchase being a .50 BMG varient for long range target shooting.

10 posted on 05/25/2005 7:59:27 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: holymoly; Dan from Michigan
Well, the good news is, the side of rightousness won.

The bad news is, "narrowly".

11 posted on 05/25/2005 8:03:01 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

A .22 will kill someone a mile away. The trick is to hit them.


12 posted on 05/25/2005 8:04:42 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

More incentive to get your 50 soon. have fun with it.


13 posted on 05/25/2005 8:08:02 AM PDT by Redcitizen (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Rep. Lovana “Lou” Jones (D-26th) said weapons have little to do with the problems of drugs and poor schools that plague her constituents.

Finally, someone who knows the truth.


14 posted on 05/25/2005 8:09:27 AM PDT by Redcitizen (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GianniV
Why won't one friggin' lazy, liberal reporter ask Daley about this?

They the chicago press are the propaganda arm of the the daley crime machine, why do you think guns are banned in chicago, have to stop the competition.

15 posted on 05/25/2005 8:09:53 AM PDT by dts32041 (Robin Hood, stealing from the government and giving back to tax payer. Where is he today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

In 60 seconds an automobile can kill someone a mile away too, so let's ban automobiles.


16 posted on 05/25/2005 8:12:12 AM PDT by Amish with an attitude (An armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Rep. Lovana “Lou” Jones (D-26th) said weapons have little to do with the problems of drugs and poor schools that plague her constituents. Echoing the comments of gun-control opponents, she questioned whether a ban would actually keep the weapons off the street.

Right! Exactly. We cannot keep drugs out of this country. We CANNOT KEEP ILLEGALS out of this country. Ban guns, and they just become the next big contraband for the sellers.

17 posted on 05/25/2005 8:12:19 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Republican Party is now OFFICIALLY The RINOcratic Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
"llinois House rejects assault weapon ban"

Good! But I guarantee you the politicians pushing this will be back.

18 posted on 05/25/2005 8:18:24 AM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender ("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
The National Rifle Association argued that the proposed ban was too broad and would ban weapons used by hunters, target-shooters and collectors as well.

Assuming that is an accurate reflection of the NRA's position, I would like it better if the NRA had chosen wording a little less suggestive of a willingness to compromise on the 2nd Amendment.

But I suspect that this is just the usual incompetence/malice of the media at work, and that NRA's position is in fact not one to compromise on this issue in Illinois.

19 posted on 05/25/2005 8:18:46 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen
And did you happen to notice that big "D" behind her name? This is why the NRA does not reflexively support Republicans nor reflexively oppose Democrats. There are plenty of Democrats who will stick their necks out for gun owners; just as there are plenty of Pubies who will stab us in the back.
20 posted on 05/25/2005 8:18:59 AM PDT by Redcloak (Over 16,000 served.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson