To: Bush2000
That means it wasn't intentional. So nobody "pulled anything" on the guys who did Stacker. How do you then explain the Stacker code found in Disk Doubler? How about one of Stacker's coder's mother's name still left in the code?
They didn't even file off the serial numbers!
92 posted on
05/28/2005 1:04:28 AM PDT by
Swordmaker
(tagline now open, please ring bell.)
To: Swordmaker
Yuppers, that's copyright.
93 posted on
05/28/2005 1:05:51 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: Swordmaker
How do you then explain the Stacker code found in Disk Doubler? How about one of Stacker's coder's mother's name still left in the code? They didn't even file off the serial numbers!
Silly, silly little man: You've been taken in by urban myth scam artists with an axe to grind against M$. That nonsense is simply false. Here's a clue: If Stac had proof of such chicanery, it would have sued M$ not only for patent infringement -- but also copyright violation. Stac didn't do that -- because no such code exists.
96 posted on
05/28/2005 12:13:50 PM PDT by
Bush2000
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson