Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3 Million Homes 'Should Be Demolished' To Cut Global Warming
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 5-30-2005 | Charles Clover

Posted on 05/29/2005 7:24:58 PM PDT by blam

3m homes 'should be demolished' to cut global warming

By Charles Clover
(Filed: 30/05/2005)

Some 3.2 million homes must be demolished over the next 45 years to fulfil the Government's aspirations for tackling global warming, academics have warned.

The report, by researchers at Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute and Heriot Watt University, is bound to re-ignite the controversy caused by the proposed demolition of 400,000 homes in the Midlands and the North.

Households account for around 30 per cent of Britain's total energy use and the researchers conclude there is a "desperate need" for a clear strategy for housing stock to bring about the 60 per cent reduction in the country's fossil fuel emissions that Tony Blair has said he wants to see by 2050.

The academics say that Britain's 25 million homes are among the oldest and least efficient in Europe and recommend that 14 per cent of the current stock - 3.2 million homes - should be pulled down by 2050.

Listed buildings would be spared, but the plan would quadruple the present demolition rate to 80,000 homes a year by 2016.

"Care must be taken not to invest money in upgrading those homes that will ultimately be demolished," say the authors.

Even so, two thirds of the housing stock of 2050 has already been built and this will have to be made more efficient. The immediate priority is for walls and lofts, then solid walls, to be insulated. By 2050 all windows will be double or even triple glazed. The report, the "40 Per Cent House", emphasises the need to construct the 10 million new homes that will be built by 2050 to far greener standards than in current building regulations.

John Prescott's department has said that from April 2006 all publicly-funded new homes - including 120,000 planned for Thames Gateway - will comply with a new code for sustainable buildings, due to be released this year.

Quinlan Terry, the leading classical architect, criticised the researchers' recommendations last week at a conference in London about designing sustainable buildings.

He said the proposed demolition missed a "bigger picture", which included the fossil fuels already expended in putting up existing buildings and how long the new buildings would last.

He said that the embodied energy in each Victorian terrace house scheduled for demolition as part of the Government's urban renewal plans in the North was equivalent to 15,000 litres of petrol, according to the Buildings Research Establishment.

The carbon from the fossil fuels burnt to build our existing housing stock was already in the atmosphere, warming the Earth. "So why repeat the process?" asked Mr Terry.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3m; blight; cary; climatechange; cut; demolished; ecowackos; environment; envirowhackos; fascism; global; globalwarming; homes; loonylefties; propertyrights; should; warming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: shellshocked
"Oh, wait, next, birth controls, abortions, and Chinese style forced hysterectomies!"

And don't forget euthanasia on demand....government demand, that is.

41 posted on 05/29/2005 7:57:31 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
MIDI - YOU DON'T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE

You had taken photos...put them on a website
There was my home for riff raff to see
I'd been warning you all that you can't mess with me
I was really mad

I called up my attorney...so began the journey
I would get 10 million bucks through the court
Anything I want, little people can't thwart
But the judge refused to give my claim his support
Now they won't let me sue you anymore

You're really irritating...like Bush, your face I'm hating
I would show you a thing, maybe two
I would squeeze you until both your nads had turned blue

I called up my attorney...so began the journey
I thought I'd get 10 million bucks through the court
Anything that I want, little people can't thwart
The judge had refused to give my claim his support
Now they won't let me sue you anymore

Anything that I want, you cannot thwart
But the judge had refused to give my claim his support
Now they won't let me sue you anymore

42 posted on 05/29/2005 7:57:38 PM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty

I read that, "vintage cat", while looking for info on cat problems on the net. He is ancient, looks it, yowls constantly, has almost no teeth, is withering. It is his time but we are having trouble facing up to it. The vet keeps doing things but it is really just old age.


43 posted on 05/29/2005 7:58:16 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blam

What happened to historic preservation?

I wonder if Windsor Castle is on the list.


44 posted on 05/29/2005 7:59:12 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert (Texas Cowboy...you da man!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Mine is 17, has almost no teeth and arthritis that gives him trouble in one leg from time to time and he's much more demanding than he used to be...and even more spoiled, but other than that, he still seems to be holding up pretty well.

.


45 posted on 05/29/2005 8:03:29 PM PDT by sweetliberty (Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: blam

Could we start with those Hollywood mansions where the lieberals live? Maybe Babs for starters?


46 posted on 05/29/2005 8:03:32 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
One of the authors displays his research methods


47 posted on 05/29/2005 8:04:36 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

"The carbon from the fossil fuels burnt to build our existing housing stock was already in the atmosphere, warming the Earth. "So why repeat the process?" asked Mr Terry."

Because wa-a-a-a-ay more carbon is sequestered in the cellulose in the wood used to build than anything embedded in the construction process.

If we ever get Kyoto, this is coming to a neighborhood near you...and you...and you...


48 posted on 05/29/2005 8:05:10 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Fun Fact: Did you know that NEWSWEEK has killed more people than Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1
Cut off their funds.

I don't think you can blame the pointy headed academic geeks this time. They are only studying what it will take to accomplish the goal set by Blair, as I understand it.

49 posted on 05/29/2005 8:05:32 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam

Academics should lead by example. I'll be glad to mail them a sledge hammer and a card board box for them to live in. "Knock yourself out".


50 posted on 05/29/2005 8:06:38 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
If we ever get Kyoto, this is coming to a neighborhood near you...and you...and you...

That's exactly right! Bush saved us BIG TIME by refusing to sign it.

51 posted on 05/29/2005 8:06:52 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

"Bush saved us BIG TIME by refusing to sign it."

For now, but they'll be back.


52 posted on 05/29/2005 8:09:59 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Fun Fact: Did you know that NEWSWEEK has killed more people than Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: blam

fools.


53 posted on 05/29/2005 8:12:29 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Democrats haven't had a new idea since Karl Marx.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Yes, I understand that much of Oxford University dates from the 12-1400's. Shall we tear down Bodlien Library first? You know, to save the Earth and all, civilization, history, and people's homes isn't too much to ask, is it?


54 posted on 05/29/2005 8:16:14 PM PDT by LexBaird ("Democracy can withstand anything but democrats" --Jubal Harshaw (RA Heinlein))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TFMcGuire

The company I worked for got a contract to demonstrate the feasibiity of cutting coal with high-speed water jets. It was discovered that the energy needed to get the coal cut was more than the energy in the coal that was cut. We sent the money back to the B of Mines, but they were not pleased.


55 posted on 05/29/2005 8:17:56 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: blam
Some 3.2 million homes must be demolished over the next 45 years to fulfil the Government's aspirations for tackling global warming, academics have warned.

I think we should demolish the academics.

56 posted on 05/29/2005 8:19:27 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

"So where are the people going to go?"

Why they will live in sturdy proletariet housing blocks of poured concrete of course.....Pending the central commitees approval of course. Imagine the smiles on the workers faces as they settle down to their first dinner (beet soup) in their new homes.


57 posted on 05/29/2005 8:23:55 PM PDT by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob

For 3.2 million they can demolish mine


58 posted on 05/29/2005 8:25:01 PM PDT by apackof2 (Truth is absolute or absolutely nothing is True)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: blam; All

Can you say, "Educated FOOLS!" Children ?


59 posted on 05/29/2005 8:29:10 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Filibusterers and overflowing commodes emit the same stinking stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I'm starting to think there's an entrance test for English academes -- if you're not a complete loon, sorry, you can't publish!

I expect Prince Charles to be sounding off about this soon, since he is the champion of vernacular architecture in his country, and I can't imagine his supporting demolishing 3M old houses, since that's what all the tourists come to see. There is an awful lot you can do to make old structures weather-tight, without tearing them down. We just completely redid an old 1960's house with no insulation and single-pane windows -- now it is all right and tight and comfortable, with insulation and new windows.

First guns, then kitchen knives, now old houses ... I'm getting very annoyed with the Brits!


60 posted on 05/29/2005 8:29:26 PM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson