Ex Bush official casts doubt on cause of Sep 11 attacks

http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=a3b42464f0f8c642 ^ | Tuesday 14th June, 2005 | Greg Szymanski

[Matrix1948]

A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.

'If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling,' said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.

[GulfBreeze]

Another bottom feeder seeks self agrandizement...

[Williams]

whaaaattttttt?

[sofaman]

Nutjob alert...the DU'ers are going to have a field day with this. Bush's fault again.

[MediaMole]

Utter horsesh!t not worth posting.

These conspiracy nuts are worse than pond scum.

[GloriaJane]

What a load of crap!

[Kozak]

[putupjob]

Why are we stuck with these kooks? The indirect message here is that the Muslims are completely innocent and we are attacking Muslims as scapegoats to promote some other agenda. And this is what our people are saying and doing. Is there any way we can win a war with kooky tin foil hat nut cases like this?

[SaveTheChief]

Further "proof" for the likes of DU.

[the Real fifi]

Yeah, he's an "expert" in this area--Just like th ever present unsoucred "CIA officials" who undercut everything the Administration says ans does and who I suspect must be washroom attendants at Langley.

[Matrix1948]

That's pretty funny

[Politicalities]

'If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling,'

And if my grandmother had balls, she'd be my grandfather.

[conservativewasp]

Yet another moron.

[c-five]

No kidding! So, hijacking and crashing four airliners was just cover? Gimme a break!

[injin]

bring back the Sedition Laws .
this is a good example of Sedition
it should be prosecutable.

[Congressman Billybob]

No, this ignoramus did not "cast doubt" on the explanation of the attack on the WTC. He only cast doubt on his own sanity. And, though the article touts him as a "former Bush official," he was one of the small number of DEMOCRATS in the Administration, as an effort to reach across the aisle.

Plus, when you read samples of this man's prior writing, he is as consistently fact-free and politically biased as Noam Chomsky. In short, this is a card-carrying fool, and only another fool would take him at all seriously.

Did I miss anything?

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Gitmo In, Gitmo Out?"

[conservativewasp]

Good point

[Williams]

Supposedly a former labor dept employee/ professor is quoted as questioning the engineering data, an area in which he would have zero expertise.

My favorite is his quote that "19 hijackers couldn't have outfoxed the mighty US military" Uh, they outfoxed security on a few commercial airliners having absolutely zip to do with the US military.

[PetroniusMaximus]

This is going to drive the DU moon-bats absolutely over the edge!

[B.O. Plenty]

Sigh....I wish these people would just go away....an inside job huh.....sh!t fire....not even Clintons and Reno would do that for crying out loud....what would the "insiders" have to gain?