Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex Bush official casts doubt on cause of Sep 11 attacks
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=a3b42464f0f8c642 ^ | Tuesday 14th June, 2005 | Greg Szymanski

Posted on 06/14/2005 3:23:22 PM PDT by Matrix1948

A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.

'If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling,' said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.

(Excerpt) Read more at feeds.bignewsnetwork.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: 911conspiracy; barkingmoonbat; barkingmoonbats; blackhelicopter; bogussource; cuckoocuckoocuckoo; kook; kookbait; lewsers; lunaticfringe; moonbats; morethorazineplease; morganreynolds; reynoldswrap; tinfoil; tinfoilhattime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Matrix1948
Morgan Reynolds apparently has a history of these allegations, which is why LewRockwell.com has a page of his archived writings. Admit it, the French were Right is my favorite.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds-arch.html

21 posted on 06/14/2005 3:33:49 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948

Hey man, why are you drilling holes in all the support columns and then cutting notches in the steel beams with a torch. And what is with all these wires being strung throughout the building? Oh, you say you are just wiring in a new super fast internet connection? Sweet!


22 posted on 06/14/2005 3:34:18 PM PDT by faq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948
Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11.

Kind of like what the farmer said when his horse died "Gee he never did that before".
What other 110 story building of external skeleton construction,on fire from having a jet plane crashed into it are they comparing it to.

Completely and utterly idiotic.Some levels of stupidity should be made criminal.

23 posted on 06/14/2005 3:34:32 PM PDT by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948
And I would take teh word of an economist about demolitions, ballistics and damage assessment why?
24 posted on 06/14/2005 3:36:50 PM PDT by AzSteven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948

Those jets didn't look airbrushed to me...

What's your opinion of the article, Matrix1948, or are those just Baby Ruth's you dropped into the punchbowl?


25 posted on 06/14/2005 3:37:35 PM PDT by glock rocks ( There are not enough liberals in Utah to bother to appease. - Warren Keuffel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Did I miss anything?

**************

Nope.

26 posted on 06/14/2005 3:38:22 PM PDT by trisham ("Live Free or Die," General John Stark, July 31, 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

"No, this ignoramus did not "cast doubt" on the explanation of the attack on the WTC. He only cast doubt on his own sanity."

He didn't cast doubt on his own sanity, he removed all remaining doubt of his INsanity.


27 posted on 06/14/2005 3:38:26 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948
Wow!! Let these nutcases rant and rave!! It only demolishes their credibility IF they ever had any in the first place.

We need to let them speak loud and clear so the electorate of the American people see them for the absolute IDIOTS they are. Repubs could never do this much damage to a party so out of touch the moon would be closer to their grasps!!

28 posted on 06/14/2005 3:38:35 PM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

Great. Red meat for the KOOKS!!


29 posted on 06/14/2005 3:39:30 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AzSteven
And I would take teh word of an economist about demolitions, ballistics and damage assessment why?

Because the font is so large?
30 posted on 06/14/2005 3:40:09 PM PDT by ConservativeByChoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948
This is essentially a blog copy of an article written around what was printed in a Washington Times report today...see a thread on that HERE

Much of the arguemetation is built upon incorrect information or out-right untruthful spin. Extensive testing of all sorts of materials and steel from the WTC debris has been run from preserved materials...I saw some of the test data at a huge engineer's conference over a year ago...photos, lab reports and the like. Yet he claims all materials were destroyed/hidden etc.

31 posted on 06/14/2005 3:41:13 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948

That just proves someone loses his or her mind virtually everyday. Glad this is a FORMER administration official.


32 posted on 06/14/2005 3:41:22 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948

33 posted on 06/14/2005 3:42:43 PM PDT by Bobalu (This is not the tag line you are looking for.....move along (waves hand))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AzSteven

"And I would take teh word of an economist about demolitions, ballistics and damage assessment why?"

Because the concept of expertise being limited to only those areas that one has actually studied is a leftover remnant of the sexist, racist, homophobic patriarchy. (End postmodernist silly-a$$ rant)


34 posted on 06/14/2005 3:43:00 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948

An economist, huh? Well, that must settle it. Sheesh.


35 posted on 06/14/2005 3:43:09 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948

If it was a controlled demolition, why bother with the planes?

I can't actually believe someone with a job at this level buys any of this fringeville crap.


36 posted on 06/14/2005 3:43:22 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948
Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it's 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding that scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11.

Okay, I'm calling all of you Aggies out to explain this guy. What in the hell is he doing at A&M spouting this garbage? Obviously, this fool is tenured...

Sign me disgusted.

37 posted on 06/14/2005 3:43:38 PM PDT by demkicker (A skunk sat on a stump; the stump thunk the skunk stunk; the skunk thunk the stump stunk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matrix1948
"... then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling"


If that is the case, the entire 'operation' was most likely a clinton ordered hit on Barbara Olson.

38 posted on 06/14/2005 3:43:54 PM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

39 posted on 06/14/2005 3:44:02 PM PDT by Rakkasan1 (The MRS wanted to go to an expensive place to eat so I took her to the gas station.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Nauseating.


40 posted on 06/14/2005 3:46:47 PM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson