Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Only last week, House Democrats staged a mock impeachment hearing based on the re-created document. Schadenfreude.
2 posted on
06/20/2005 7:57:44 AM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The truth behind this story is becoming Rather apparent now.
3 posted on
06/20/2005 7:58:44 AM PDT by
msjhall
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The Minneapolis Star/Tribune (aka The Red Star) has thoroughly researched this issue (in other words, have beaten it to death) and are convinced that the Downing Street memo is completely accurate.
And I believe them....each and every word.
(sarcasm off)
4 posted on
06/20/2005 7:59:13 AM PDT by
MplsSteve
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"he protected the identity of the source he had obtained the documents from by typing copies of them on plain paper and destroying the originals."
Please give me a break.... does this guy work for Dan Blather and Complete Bull Stuff News?
5 posted on
06/20/2005 7:59:50 AM PDT by
schwing_wifey
(Coffee, Today's Toons, and Flaming Trolls - Yeeeaaaarrrgggggg PDT +9hours)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
6 posted on
06/20/2005 8:00:00 AM PDT by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm not suprised at all. How many times will these Democrats walk away with egg on their face and still never learn from it? John Kerry is an ass.
7 posted on
06/20/2005 8:00:09 AM PDT by
Ragtop
(We are the people our parents warned us about)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Typed a copy and destroyed originals: Should read: Typed phony documentation furnished by ???????????????
9 posted on
06/20/2005 8:00:48 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Yeah right. WHAT ORIGINALS. By trying to make everyone BELIEVE he destroyed the originals, he assumes we will think his articles are based on facts. NICE TRY....better luck next time A-hole.
10 posted on
06/20/2005 8:01:38 AM PDT by
marty60
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Fake, but accurate. . . .
12 posted on
06/20/2005 8:02:24 AM PDT by
jtminton
(Help stop second hand rap!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kerry is sooooo desperate! Desperate times, desperate measures.
It's a pitiful thing to watch a grown man make a fool of himself.
14 posted on
06/20/2005 8:02:52 AM PDT by
peacebaby
(We can't become what we need to be by remaining what we are. Oprah Winfrey)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I find this Rather amusing.
15 posted on
06/20/2005 8:02:53 AM PDT by
Samwise
(In the battle between good and evil, evil often wins unless good is very, very careful.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I guess Smith et al knew better than to produce the "original" document--it was likely a forgery and would have been picked apart instantly. To suggest the problems might be limited to just a typo or two is certainly generous, but unlikely.
Any more, it appears that if you can't find the news you want to report, just make it up.
16 posted on
06/20/2005 8:03:22 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
19 posted on
06/20/2005 8:05:37 AM PDT by
6ppc
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Only last week, House Democrats staged a mock impeachment hearing based on the re-created document.
Do these people actually work? Tax payers money being wasted is what I think. What a bunch of loosers...
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
the source of the memo now admitting he retyped the document before destroying the originals. That's about as convenient as an unobserves autopsy followed by a quick cremation
23 posted on
06/20/2005 8:07:12 AM PDT by
Cowman
(Just when you hit the bottom of the stupid hole you notice the guy next to you is digging)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This would actually be funny if it wasn't such a serious issue. Conyers and his crew have invoked the Dan Rather standard...NONE! And this is supposedly from 2002? Bull cookies!
24 posted on
06/20/2005 8:07:34 AM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(The sun actually came up today so it's a pretty good day)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"How conveeeenient."
25 posted on
06/20/2005 8:08:09 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Flush Newsweek!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
These retyped versions of the destroyed copies of the alleged originals remind me of the old Stephen Wright joke:
I have the authentic original axe that George Washington used to cut down the cherry tree. Of course, I did have to replace the handle....and the head. But it does occupy the same space.
26 posted on
06/20/2005 8:09:01 AM PDT by
Petronski
(Be alert! The world needs more lerts.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
My dog ate my homework!!
Pray for W and Our Troops
27 posted on
06/20/2005 8:10:08 AM PDT by
bray
(Pray for Iraq's Freedom from Mohammad)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
British reporter Michael Smith, who broke the memo story in the London Times on May 1, revealed to the Associated Press over the weekend that he "he protected the identity of the source he had obtained the documents from by typing copies of them on plain paper and destroying the originals."
Could this mean destroying the original copies ? Why would someone give up the real originals ? Why retype, when white-out/photocopy is easier to do ?
28 posted on
06/20/2005 8:10:37 AM PDT by
stylin19a
(Suicide bomber ??? "I came to the wrong jihad")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson