Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surviving a Nuclear Attack on Washington, D.C.
National Journal ^ | June 24th 2005 | By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.

Posted on 06/24/2005 10:54:52 AM PDT by ExSoldier

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 481-484 next last
To: JAKraig
If the Arab world knew that we had no choice other than the kind of massive retaliation that will follow a nuclear strike on our soil they might do all they can to stop the terrorist before they commit mass suicide.

I fear you may be crediting the IsamoNazi's with more intelligence than they posess.

The rest I agree with. I'd want payback. I'd want a disproportianate response on a massive scale. And prehaps a per head bounty on any remaining muzzies.

Figurativly speaking: Salt the earth for the muzzies.

341 posted on 08/18/2006 9:52:15 PM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man
I think EMP is overrated from what I've read about it. Basically if your radio or electronic device isn't connected to a power source (usually the A/C line) or an antenna, it should be safe but if you want added protection to make sure, put it in a grounded metal box.

Actually, you DON'T want it in a grounded metal box. Earth is a conductor you know. The electronics should be wrapped in foil and/or metal screen mesh and then placed in some non conducting box (rubbermaid, tupperware etc.)

342 posted on 08/18/2006 10:07:51 PM PDT by AFreeBird (... Burn the land and boil the sea's, but you can't take the skies from me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR

Do you have dehydrated food?


343 posted on 08/18/2006 10:09:52 PM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion have been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Thank you very much for posting this.


344 posted on 08/18/2006 10:14:26 PM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion have been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Ok, I've got to ask ... WHY? Radiation therapy for cancer?

Yes. I discovered the tumor July 21, 1985. It was removed August 6, 1985. I waited for 3 weeks for the pathology report. It was a pure seminoma. Malignant, but apparently completely contained. A lymphangiogram was performed to check the lymph system, then the doc recommended 3000 rads of radiation. Each treatment was preceded with a blood test to make sure that the radiation had not destroyed so much of my bone marrow that the treatment could not continue. The usual treatment aligned the aperture on my stomach and blasted 150 rads. After 10 minutes to clear the air in the room, the techs returned to spin the aperture around and fire another 150 rads through my back. I then hopped into my car and drove home as quickly as possible. Most times I managed to get in the door before heaving my guts out. A couple times I had to pull over, open my car door and let rip. You learn early in the treatment to eat early in the day before the treatment so all the food is already digested. I nearly ripped my esophagus with brown rice after one treatment.

The treatments gave me a first hand experience with "conditioned response" like Pavlov's dogs. By the 3rd treatment I would start getting more nauseous as I approached the oncologists office. Once in the door, my stomach was already wretching from the smell of the ionized air in the waiting room. It was very hard to get through all the treatments. The nauseous reaction persisted for 6 months after the treatment. Driving west on Miramar Road, then south on I-805 would provoke nausea.

345 posted on 08/18/2006 10:34:19 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Fascinating read... thanks!


346 posted on 08/18/2006 10:34:45 PM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
Here's another thought. The Constitution does not forbid moving the capital


IMHO no elected official should ever be out of rifle range of their constituents
347 posted on 08/18/2006 10:53:36 PM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

two words,

civil defense.


348 posted on 08/18/2006 10:56:12 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe

Excellent points.

I will try to get a copy of Miracle Mile. Thanks.

jm


349 posted on 08/19/2006 2:03:09 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.gravityteen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning

It's a little dated, but chilling -- and IMO an excellent look at... no, I won't plot-spoil it for you. :)

Let's just say that I didn't really need to invoke my "suspension of disbelief" mechanisms when viewing it. There's a bit more realism than many people will be comfortable with.

I believe this film qualifies as a "sleeper" -- hardly anyone seems to have heard of it, let alone viewed it.


350 posted on 08/19/2006 5:22:31 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
Moving the capital and returning the land of the present capital to the states, deflates that balloon forever.

Really. Which state would want it back? Move the goverment which supports the massive industry aimed at supporting Government, and the industry would move, too. Disneyland it ain't, so all that would be left is a poster child for urban decay and a few museums and monuments, surrounded by crime infested streets. All the bad things a city can bring, and diddley to the good.

351 posted on 08/19/2006 5:37:01 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Bump back to the top!


352 posted on 08/19/2006 6:31:27 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man
I grew up under the shadow of "The Bomb," during an era when all the "Bible prophecy teachers" asserted the inevitability of a global soviet takeover. God eliminated that bogey almost overnight.

People I know are studying Turkish and Arabic in preparation for the day when God discredits Islam, and millions of former muslims are desperately seeking guidance on how to structure their lives, now that their underpinnings have been kicked out from under them. (I saw first-hand the psychic bewilderment experienced by disillusioned Ukrainians.)

But, if we are talking about self-avowed enemies of God, consider the state religion of the USA, a vague unitarianism that in practice recognizes no deity above The State. That supports the massacre (through abortion) of millions of innocents around the world.

Will we be ready to respond redemptively to the fall of Islam? And later, to the fall of secular humanism? I pray so.

(Parenthetically -- if Morris and Whitcombe's Genesis Flood hydrology is valid, I wonder if a nuclear exchange disrupted that system, and brought about Noah's flood? There's a novel in there somewhere for the ambitious writer ... )

353 posted on 08/19/2006 6:33:09 AM PDT by TomSmedley (Calvinist, optimist, home schooling dad, exuberant husband, technical writer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: DCMB
In the 70ties at the height of the so called " survivalist " fad several good books where written on the subject
They may become handy now , here a short list
Life after doomsday by Bruce Clayton
Nuclear war survival skills by Cresson h Kearny
Both are very serious books specially Kearny
There is also books from Ragnar Benson,Mel Tappan and Duncan Long
Mostly " fantasy " but whit good info here and there
354 posted on 08/19/2006 6:39:28 AM PDT by 1903A3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Prost1
Every man, woman, child that is muslim will be dead within hours of the event. There will be not muslim country left, from Africa to Indonesia. I will have as much pity for the innocent muslim as the innocent muslim has for us.

What about all the muslims here in this country...the men women and children? You going to line all of them up and shoot 'em? YOU going to do the job? I hear your anger. But I don't think you're the sort of person who could kill a child in cold blood. Let alone thousands or hundreds of thousands kids and women. What about the law abiding muslims in our own armed forces? See? It's not so simple.

355 posted on 08/19/2006 6:56:50 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: TomSmedley; SunkenCiv
I grew up under the shadow of "The Bomb," during an era when all the "Bible prophecy teachers" asserted the inevitability of a global soviet takeover. God eliminated that bogey almost overnight.

I remember those twoo. I remember in college, I read one short story where it took place in a small town, set in the late 1950's or early 1960's where the wrter commented on one of his fellow classmates he went to school with is working at a supermarket and basically that's all he aspired to. He once remarked that he'd still be at that position, perhaps work his way up to manager of (paraphrasing) "the collective by 1992 when the Soviets took over America." There were some who thought we will be run over by the Russians at that time and later, I think though, many of those stories were like a warning where "this could happen unless we get our act together." Again, much like the Moslem stories today although the Moslems do have the manpower if thet kiss and makeup between the Sunnis and Shias. I think here, we are letting them do it because of political correctness.

(Parenthetically -- if Morris and Whitcombe's Genesis Flood hydrology is valid, I wonder if a nuclear exchange disrupted that system, and brought about Noah's flood? There's a novel in there somewhere for the ambitious writer ... )

Well, there are some stories, rumors, conjucture, and "forbidden archeology" where there is a belief and perhaps some evidence that we might have have an atomic war in the past, some point to Atlantis and another foe, many point to where India and Pakistan (whatever they were called then) had such a war 12,000 years ago and there are claims where they found green glass (glass from sand formed from an atomic explosion, "Trintinite," they call it, from the word "Trinity" when the first atomic bomb was tested) at various sites and skeletons that look like they had the flesh vaporized form them and so on.

As to the story of Noah's Ark and such, I wonder when the date was when that happened? Could be a possible lead there. There is a list on this site maintained by SunkenCiv that shares a lot of such things on subjects like these and others too. Very interesting reading.

I think I made that comment last year and my position is still the same, we need to get our butts in gear and recognize the threat better than we are now, otherwise, we will lose and deserve to, we will have no one to blame but ourselves for falling into the PC claptrap we are in now.
356 posted on 08/19/2006 7:18:15 AM PDT by Nowhere Man (Michael Savage for President - 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man; TomSmedley

[ I don't endorse the views in these topics, though ;') ]

Ancient Atomic Warfare - Religious texts and geological evidence
New York Herald Tribune on February 16, 1947 | New York Herald Tribune on February 16, 1947 | Ivan T. Sanderson
Posted on 07/22/2002 5:01:00 PM EDT by vannrox
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/720501/posts

Terrestrial Evidence of a Nuclear Catastrophe in Paleoindian Times
Mammoth Trumpet | March 2001 | Firestone/Topping
Posted on 07/24/2006 3:03:03 AM EDT by ForGod'sSake
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1671134/posts


357 posted on 08/19/2006 8:08:27 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

See post # 297 in this thread, account of my own dream of a state capital in midwest being nuked during my lifetime.

jm


358 posted on 08/19/2006 8:43:24 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.gravityteen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Here, pinging you to post 297, nuke strike against capital city of a state in the midwest. I had this dream in January 2005.

jm


359 posted on 08/19/2006 9:19:30 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.gravityteen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: All

Saturday morning reminder for those FReeping and lurking:


SHELTERING IN PLACE INFO --

SNIP:

If you do not want to trust in weather and traffic, the alternative is what the experts call “sheltering in place.” You want to be in a building, as solid as possible to block the gamma rays, as airtight as possible to keep out radioactive dust. You need to turn off air conditioning, close vents, seal the seams around windows and doorways. If you wondered what former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge was talking about, this is what you need the duct tape for. Abandon rooms with windows broken by the blast.

The dust that does not seep into the building will settle outside, on the roof and on the ground, emitting gamma rays. A car with an intact windshield stops 30 to 50 percent of the radiation — probably not enough, however, to save someone who’s inside the car and stuck in traffic a few miles downwind of ground zero.

A wood-frame house, similarly, stops just 30 to 60 percent of gamma rays. A windowless basement stops 90 percent. The middle floors of a concrete apartment building, safely away from both roof and ground, stop 99 percent or more. But there is no 100 percent protection.

For those whom evacuation and shelter fail — or for those, like the thousands fleeing in blind panic, who never try either — there is still decontamination. A lethal dose of radiation takes time to build. The sooner the radioactive dust is off the skin, the better. And it is not that hard to remove. “Radiation contamination is easier than chemical,” said Col. David Jarrett, a medical doctor and the director of the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute in Bethesda. “Simply removing the clothes and washing takes off up to 90 percent.”

...

END OF SNIP
===


360 posted on 08/19/2006 9:22:58 AM PDT by JockoManning (http://www.gravityteen.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 481-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson