Skip to comments.
'Today' OKs Gay Weddings
Broadcasting and Cable ^
| 06/27/05
| Broadcasting and Cable
Posted on 06/27/2005 9:05:17 AM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121 next last
1
posted on
06/27/2005 9:05:18 AM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
People just don't get it. Its not that most of us are "homophobes" is that we just don't care. Its not special, doesn't mean anything to us. If they have gay weddings on NBC, big woop-de-doo. Its just not newsworthy to me.
2
posted on
06/27/2005 9:07:32 AM PDT
by
ruiner
To: Pikamax
Never watch Today and this is just another good reason why.
3
posted on
06/27/2005 9:07:34 AM PDT
by
mlc9852
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: lynxaken
To: Pikamax
Today would not be jumping through all these hoops unless they intended to go through with this. I would bet you an e-beer that within a year the program that gave us the interior of Perky Katie's colon will cross a whole new frontier of giving us waaaaaay more information than we needed to know...
7
posted on
06/27/2005 9:11:33 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES!!)
To: Pikamax
Today continues its headlong rush to the bottom of the ratings basement.
Clue to NBC programmers: focus your content on viewers that are able to naturally reproduce and who will live past 50 on average.
8
posted on
06/27/2005 9:11:49 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: lynxaken
9
posted on
06/27/2005 9:13:04 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES!!)
To: lynxaken; MeekOneGOP
Trolls are coming out of the woodwork this morning.
10
posted on
06/27/2005 9:13:18 AM PDT
by
Godzilla
(The 2nd Amendment - The Original Homeland Security)
To: ruiner
It will be important to you (maybe) after the Supreme Court finds it a 14th Amendment right. And of course, after same sex marriage, how long before polygomy and polyandry will be protected by law? What about people who want to marry their dog or cat if the animal appears willing? Don't laugh, this is all coming down in a few years.
Soon, churches that don't recognize these "legal" unions will be subjected to civil suits in our courts. It's all coming in the next 50 years.
11
posted on
06/27/2005 9:15:09 AM PDT
by
kjo
To: Pikamax
Now the Supreme Court can talk about the emerging consensus favoring gay marriage, based on what they see on TV shows and in scholarly articles by liberal law professors and liberal social scientists.
Forget the people and what they think. They are not enlightened. Our law will be made by judges and liberal academics, thank you very much.
12
posted on
06/27/2005 9:18:25 AM PDT
by
Montfort
(President George Allen)
To: lynxaken
It's the fair thing to do.Cornholing?
To: kjo
Soon, churches that don't recognize these "legal" unions will be subjected to civil suits in our courts. It's all coming in the next 50 years.
Either that or all marriages will be deemed unconstitutional. With thanks to the ACLU of course.
14
posted on
06/27/2005 9:19:33 AM PDT
by
Millee
(So you're a feminist......isn't that cute??)
To: kjo
Soon, churches that don't recognize these "legal" unions will be subjected to civil suits in our courts. It's all coming in the next 50 years.
At the speed it's been going, I say your 50 year estimate is a tad high, try about 5 years max. No way are the activists going to wait 50 years.
To: Pikamax
16
posted on
06/27/2005 9:21:04 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: mizmoutarde; lynxaken
What they wrote earlier
on a different thread: "I think it's a ridiculous assumption that a heterosexual boy is going to start 'experimenting' because he saw a gay character on a sitcom. You are either gay or straight, there is no choice or whim involved. Also, every respected psychological and medical organization in the United States and Europe reject the notion that homosexuality can either be changed or stems from a psychological problem. The truth of the matter is that this kind of rhetoric makes millions of homosexuals in the United States live in guilt and fear because of what a few questionable lines in an anachronistic book say."
Formatting my own.
17
posted on
06/27/2005 9:21:03 AM PDT
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: Pikamax
. For six years, the show has been running a series that offers an on-air wedding to couples willing to let viewers help select details .... Darn, now the viewers won't get to help pick the wedding gown! Unless....hummmm? /sarcasm off
18
posted on
06/27/2005 9:21:28 AM PDT
by
CitizenM
("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
To: lynxaken
lynxaken Since 2005-26-07
Welcome aboard, how's DU running?
19
posted on
06/27/2005 9:23:50 AM PDT
by
Romish_Papist
(The times are out of step with the Catholic Church. God Bless Pope Benedict XVI.)
To: lynxaken
Really?
And why would that be?
It would be a source of revenue for lawyers, divorce settlements, tangled insurance claims, and tangled courts cases in an already overly bloated system.
No, it isn't a fair thing.
20
posted on
06/27/2005 9:23:54 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Hey troll, Sith happens.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson