Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Developer seeks Souter's property
worldnetdaily.com ^ | 6/28/2005 | Ron Strom

Posted on 06/28/2005 11:04:00 AM PDT by ovrtaxt

A private developer has contacted the local government in Supreme Court Justice David Souter's hometown in New Hampshire asking that the property of the judge – who voted in favor of a controversial decision allowing a city to take residents' homes for private development – be seized to make room for a new hotel.

Yesterday, Logan Darrow Clements faxed a request to Chip Meany, the code enforcement officer of the town of Weare, N.H., seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road, the present location of Souter's home.

Wrote Clements: "Although this property is owned by an individual, David H. Souter, a recent Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. City of New London, clears the way for this land to be taken by the government of Weare through eminent domain and given to my LLC for the purposes of building a hotel. The justification for such an eminent domain action is that our hotel will better serve the public interest as it will bring in economic development and higher tax revenue to Weare."

The Kelo v. City of New London decision, handed down Thursday, allows the New London, Conn., government to seize the homes and businesses of residents to facilitate the building of an office complex that would provide economic benefits to the area and more tax revenue to the city. Though the practice of eminent domain is provided for in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, this case is significant because the seizure is for private development and not for "public use," such as a highway or bridge. The decision has been roundly criticized among property-rights activists and limited-government commentators.

According to a statement from Clement, the proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, "featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America." Instead of a Gideon's Bible in each room, guests will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged," the statement said.

Clements says the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site – "being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans."

"This is not a prank" said Clements. "The town of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."

Clements says his plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise additional capital for the project.

While Clements currently makes a living in marketing and video production, he tells WND he has had involvement in real estate development and is fully committed to the project.

"We will build a hotel there if investors come forward, definitely," he said.

Clements is the CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, which is dedicated to fighting "the most deadly and destructive force on the planet: abusive governments," the website states.

The activist says he is aware of the apparent conflict of someone who is strongly opposed to the Kelo decision using it to purposely oust an American from his property.

"I realize there is a contradiction, but we're only going to use it against people who advocated" the Kelo decision, Clements told WND. "Therefore, it's a case of retaliation, not initiation."

Clements says some people have already offered to put money into the project.

Related stories:

Property battle heads to states

High court's property decision stirs anger

Court rules cities can seize homes


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; kelo; landgrab; scotus; souter; turass; whatsgoodforthegoose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last
To: dead

LOL! ;-D


41 posted on 06/28/2005 11:15:09 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Does anyone want to go in on a B&B in Chappiqua?

I'll bet we can make a fortune with the Kennedy Compound!


42 posted on 06/28/2005 11:15:35 AM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Priceless!


43 posted on 06/28/2005 11:15:54 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Souter should retire immediately to confront this.


44 posted on 06/28/2005 11:16:00 AM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

See #42 ;-D


45 posted on 06/28/2005 11:16:19 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I need to book a reservation to be the first to stay in the Souter Suite!


46 posted on 06/28/2005 11:16:27 AM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGVet58
schadenfreude does not serve us well here, much less serve our 5th amendment. The 5th must be re-instated for ALL citizens, even those who undermine our core rights such as that little socialist, Souter. Or, are we now to be reduced to tacit compliance with this rape of the Constitution, basing our yeas and nays solely on whether or not the person who's property rights are being violated finds favor in our eyes?

This is being done primarily as a political statement to point out the folly of the decision to those responsible for making it.

47 posted on 06/28/2005 11:17:31 AM PDT by kevkrom (“It’s good to remember whom people turn to when they’re desperate — and it ain’t Kofi Annan.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

yeessssssss!!!!


48 posted on 06/28/2005 11:17:43 AM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: ovrtaxt

Oh, the delicious irony of it all. :-)


50 posted on 06/28/2005 11:17:57 AM PDT by TChris ("You tweachewous miscweant!" -- Elmer Fudd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Another thread from a different article is here.
51 posted on 06/28/2005 11:18:21 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Hey we need to contact the town council and start lobbying for the project.


52 posted on 06/28/2005 11:18:42 AM PDT by agincourt1415 (4 More Years of NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: ovrtaxt

Bump for a great idea!


54 posted on 06/28/2005 11:19:29 AM PDT by djreece ("... Until He leads justice to victory." Matt. 12:20c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Well, he said he only needs 3 out of 5 selectmen. It might be a little more complicated than that (planning board, countersuits, etc) but it might be worth it to push some folks to run for seats on that board. This is doable, I think.


55 posted on 06/28/2005 11:19:51 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The story is true" - Dan Rather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CGVet58
Or, are we now to be reduced to tacit compliance with this rape of the Constitution, basing our yeas and nays solely on whether or not the person who's property rights are being violated finds favor in our eyes?

Do you not get the idea of theatrical protest? (those weren't really Indians at the Boston Tea Party)

Souter will not lose his home, of course, but he will be forced to confront the implications of decision on a personal level. And the media will be forced to discuss the implications as well, particularly if a slight majority on this town planning commission feels like stirring the pot too.

56 posted on 06/28/2005 11:20:59 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415
Hey we need to contact the town council and start lobbying for the project.

My family will book a vaction there if they build it.

57 posted on 06/28/2005 11:21:35 AM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I love to see this kind of cleverness and creativity from conservatives.


58 posted on 06/28/2005 11:21:40 AM PDT by sawoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGVet58
Destruction of private property may not have been right, but the Boston Tea Party had a salutary effect.
59 posted on 06/28/2005 11:21:50 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
I'll bet we can make a fortune with the Kennedy Compound!

Wasn't it Bush '41 who put Souter on the Supreme Court?

I think there is a nice little property in Kennecut, Maine that would make a nice luxury resort hotel.

60 posted on 06/28/2005 11:22:08 AM PDT by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson