Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rove Blew CIA Agent's Cover (O'Donnell says NewsWeak is outing him next week)
Huffington Compost ^ | Lawrence O'Donnell

Posted on 07/02/2005 10:40:22 AM PDT by hipaatwo

I revealed in yesterday's taping of the McLaughlin Group that Time magazine's emails will reveal that Karl Rove was Matt Cooper's source. I have known this for months but didn't want to say it at a time that would risk me getting dragged into the grand jury.

McLaughlin is seen in some markets on Friday night, so some websites have picked it up, including Drudge, but I don't expect it to have much impact because McLaughlin is not considered a news show and it will be pre-empted in the big markets on Sunday because of tennis.

Since I revealed the big scoop, I have had it reconfirmed by yet another highly authoritative source. Too many people know this. It should break wide open this week. I know Newsweek is working on an 'It's Rove!' story and will probably break it tomorrow.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; deepleak; karlrove; plame; rove; spooks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: Mo1

I know! He'll start spitting!


41 posted on 07/02/2005 10:55:26 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Lawrence O'Donnell is in the foreground and Matt Cooper is in the background. Playing 'Dumb & Dimmer' trying to police the media. Total Bovine Squat. Duuuuh ! DUH ! duuuuH !


42 posted on 07/02/2005 10:55:33 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shaq ONeal
Is this common, for someone in Rove's position to know who individual CIA agents are?

Rove didn't even know Wilson went to Niger, let alone who recommended him, until Wilson revealed it in his column.

Since the Wilson column was published when the President was in Africa and the administration response was uncharacteriscally inept showing they clearly had no idea what was going on, that alone demonstrates it wasn't anyone from those quarters.

43 posted on 07/02/2005 10:55:43 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I just LOVE saying it..........they were RABID about it for MONTHS.


44 posted on 07/02/2005 10:55:48 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Wow, I hadn't read the whole transcript. O'Donnell is flat-out bonkers, isn't he?


45 posted on 07/02/2005 10:56:23 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: onyx
this O'Donnell guy was continuously specualating about the source being another name... I just can't recall that name.

Probably Scooter Libby?

Libby was another name the dems tossed around with abandon until he was cleared by reluctant reporters (including Matt Cooper).

46 posted on 07/02/2005 10:57:42 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
..........they were RABID about it for MONTHS

That's putting it mildly

47 posted on 07/02/2005 10:59:15 AM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I've had that article bookmarked---not sure why you're flagging me to it, but thanks!


48 posted on 07/02/2005 10:59:56 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Who is Lawrence O'Donnell and why he should not be taken seriously:

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/000699.htm

49 posted on 07/02/2005 11:00:22 AM PDT by mbraynard (Mustache Rides - Five Cents!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Was Rove "in the White House" at the time of the leak? Didn't he get his job in the WH after the last election?


50 posted on 07/02/2005 11:00:25 AM PDT by Arkie2 (No, I never voted for Bill Clinton. I don't plan on voting Republican again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Here's the video. It's about 6 minutes, but really should be seen.
51 posted on 07/02/2005 11:00:43 AM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

I can just see Wilson, thinking he's so suave and debonair, adjusting his ascot, while he whispers what his wife does -- using her position and embellishing it to give him credibility .. all the while, making his dastardly attempt to undermine W. I think he's the culprit and his Klintonite Kabal .. then he squeals afterward that her cover's been blown by the WH, who I don't believe authorized or had any specific knowledge of his "adventure."


52 posted on 07/02/2005 11:00:51 AM PDT by STARWISE ( You get the govt. you deserve. CALL YOUR CONGRESS CRITTERS OFTEN -U.S. CONGRESS: 1-877-762-8762)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

I confess I really don't know this O'donnall guy.

Who, or what, is he?


53 posted on 07/02/2005 11:02:13 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Valerie Plame was an undercover agent. She was sleeping with a (former) US Ambassador.

Somehow this leaked out.

54 posted on 07/02/2005 11:02:24 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Watch the video at post #51.


55 posted on 07/02/2005 11:02:43 AM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Has anyone ever seen somebody "dragged" into a grand jury? Pet peeve of mine.

You're not alone. During the Starr grand jury I noticed that witnesses were "dragged" or "hauled".

That's the lefty way when they don't like an investigation. When they do, a witness is simply "called".

56 posted on 07/02/2005 11:03:04 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
No crime from anyone was committed by giving her name. The Grand Jury has to determine that the individual(s) knew Plame was an undercover operative and leaked it on purpose. I personally think the GJ is beyond that because they haven't reinterviewed any administration official to clarify any issues or get someone on perjury. Novak had probably already testified to who it was and the judge is testing Miller and Cooper to see who he has to send to jail for defying his order.
57 posted on 07/02/2005 11:04:36 AM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I didn't follow this Plame thing much. I wasn't much into politics when this happened. The one thing I do know is that O'Donnell is completely insane. It will be nice to see the DUmmies get their hopes up and once again their brains smashed in with disappointment.


58 posted on 07/02/2005 11:05:27 AM PDT by hipaatwo (When you're in trouble you want all your friends around you...preferably armed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thought so, but was just checking. 8P


59 posted on 07/02/2005 11:06:51 AM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

FOFL!! .. thanks for that link


60 posted on 07/02/2005 11:07:02 AM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson