Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The London bombings were fueled by oil (left gets in gear, blames America)
Seattle Times ^ | 7/08/05 | Froma Harrop

Posted on 07/08/2005 10:32:50 PM PDT by Libloather

The London bombings were fueled by oil
Friday, July 8, 2005 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
Froma Harrop / Syndicated columnist

It is oil's fault. The London bombings are almost surely al-Qaida's work, which means oil paid for them. Oil keeps the Mideast backward. It funds the madrassas that fill heads with anti-West poison. And it pays the terrorists who plant bombs on European trains and fly airplanes into American buildings. It is time we did something about oil.

The United States accounts for 25 percent of the world's oil consumption. We could crush oil's power to hurt us with a serious campaign to kick our fossil-fuel habit. But we don't, because we have an administration and Congress that care more about the oil industry than about us.

That said, not everyone in Washington is craven to the god of petroleum. The Senate has just passed an energy bill that provides real incentives for conservation and alternative sources. But little of the good stuff made it into the House version. And so, the Senate must now reconcile its modern vision with the House's primitive worship of fossil fuels.

We're in Iraq because of oil. That's not to say our intentions were ever to take over Iraqi oil fields. Our interest is to transform Mesopotamia and the rest of the Mideast into stable democracies. The theory is that angry theologies and genocidal tyrants frustrate economic advancement and breed dementia. Change all that, and the Mideast will become a peaceful and prosperous region.

But were it not for oil, that part of the world would have long ago moved toward modern economies. The people would have had no choice. They would have done it themselves. Americans would not be sending their soldiers to build democracy for them.

But the corrupting influence of oil goes on because the United States hasn't had the discipline and courage to end the oil game. The Bush administration's only energy policy is to provide new tax breaks to the drillers and open up wildlife refuges to energy companies. As national policy, it's a sideshow: The amount of oil that could be economically taken from the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge is minuscule next to our energy needs.

This approach damages us because it maintains the myth that America can somehow reduce its dependency on foreign oil without giving up oil consumption. World supply and global demand ultimately set the price of oil. China's mushrooming economy alone will keep it rising. The idea that U.S. oil companies would give Americans a break on the world price because the crude came out of Alaska is utter fantasy.

The lack of will to tackle the problem lies not in the American people but in their leadership. An Associated Press poll in April asked this simple question: "Do you think George W. Bush is or is not handling the nation's energy problems effectively?" Two-thirds answered, "Is not."

Every time someone suggests programs to reduce America's oil consumption, the president says "can't do." It would harm the economy, he argues. But empowering terrorists with oil money also damages the economy. For further reference, study the recession that intensified after the 9/11 attacks. Look at our limp response to something as simple as applying fuel-efficiency standards, now required on cars, to light trucks. The president and Congress quickly squelched that idea. Why? It would raise the price of SUVs, and that is purportedly more than Americans can stand.

The civilized world's struggle against terrorism is a fight against oil. We must fight it everywhere and with every weapon. That means fuel-efficient appliances, wind turbines, solar panels, nuclear energy and hybrid engines. And yes, throw in ethanol. Thanks to improved production techniques, corn-based fuel now produces more energy than is required to make it. Ethanol is a player.

The awful bombings in London — no matter who did them — remind us that terrorist attacks on the West are not one-time deals. There will be more of them, and some will happen here. And when they do, there will be more hand-wringing about our addiction to oil.

But instead of wringing hands, we could start applying elbow grease. Americans really do want to reduce their dependency on oil. They are willing — even eager — to make short-term sacrifices for this longer-term good. But they need leaders who are with them and serious about taking America out of the oil quagmire and into an enlightened age.

Providence Journal columnist Froma Harrop's column appears regularly on editorial pages of The Times. Her e-mail address is fharrop@projo.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: america; blames; bombings; fueled; gear; gets; left; london; oil; rats; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
I wonder what kind of SUV Froma owns. Seattle? Plenty of heat needed to keep those houses warm. We may have to blame her...
1 posted on 07/08/2005 10:32:51 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Froma Harrop received an honorable mention on Rush's Friday broadcast. Its Halliburton! Its the oil! Bush lied! Kids died! Here we go again!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 07/08/2005 10:37:03 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Froma's understanding of economics appears to be hampered by her political ideology.
3 posted on 07/08/2005 10:39:55 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Does this moron actually believe we could make oil valueless?? Nobody could be that stupid.


4 posted on 07/08/2005 10:40:12 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Logically, then, the moral thing to do is to sieze the oil without paying for it.


5 posted on 07/08/2005 10:42:57 PM PDT by thoughtomator (For all you love to survive, Islam must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Froma's understanding is hampered.


6 posted on 07/08/2005 10:45:08 PM PDT by jblair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Oil did not make them do 'it'!!

Bad men did bad things.!!

If not oil then there would be some other source!!!

7 posted on 07/08/2005 10:50:05 PM PDT by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I blame the stupidity of her column on the trees it took to make today's newspaper.


8 posted on 07/08/2005 10:50:35 PM PDT by jayhorn (when i hit the drum, you shake the booty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What disgusts me more than anything is that she gets paid to write this sh*t.


9 posted on 07/08/2005 11:01:51 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Understand Islam. Understand Evil. Read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD link My Page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
To the left, the criminal is the very last person to blame for it. Rather blame the hundreds of millions of us who use oil before finally getting to the actual terrorists--of course, they use oil, too, so...

Leftist logic in action. No wonder they all look so PAINED all the time, they've got their little brains having headaches with this malarky.

10 posted on 07/08/2005 11:11:16 PM PDT by Darkwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
So deserving...


11 posted on 07/08/2005 11:17:59 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
But were it not for oil, that part of the world would have long ago moved toward modern economies.

Naw they would have still been backward.

12 posted on 07/08/2005 11:19:12 PM PDT by The Red Zone (Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
It is oil's fault.

I stopped reading after that.

They're so predictable.

They'll blame Aemricans for this, when in actuality the blame lies fully on the evil cowardice of al-Qaeda.

No, wait...I put some of the blame on the leftist media for encouraging and supporting al-Qaeda with crap like this article.

13 posted on 07/08/2005 11:22:30 PM PDT by Allegra (On the Rocks With Salt, Please...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She puts out a pretty good screed, but she completely skips the little piece of reality that happens if something happens to the oil supply. It won't be pretty, but there is a lot of interesting technology coming. As oil gets more scarce and the supply more tenuous, other energy technologies will come on line.

Wars will be with us until the end of time. Get used to it!


14 posted on 07/08/2005 11:24:24 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It would only take a few barrels of oil to pay for the small quantities of explosives apparently used in the London terrorism. The issue is not oil or money, but ideology.


15 posted on 07/08/2005 11:26:00 PM PDT by AZLiberty (French: The language of diplomacy, except for the French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The dependence upon oil is wedded to the Left's wackos vetoing any real alternatives.

Nuclear? Horrors!

Coal gasification or coal fired plants? Heavens to murgatroyd; NO!

Drill for more natural gas? Not in MY preserve!

Import it to offshore terminals, then? ACK! (Or should that be Great Auk?)

Build wind farms...but don't kill any birds, or put it in MY shoal waters!

And the list of their NIMBY hypocrisy goes on...but IT'S BUSH'S FAULT!
16 posted on 07/08/2005 11:30:40 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more work horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather


17 posted on 07/08/2005 11:32:23 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Every evil which liberals imagine Judaism and Christianity to be, islam is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No wonder the terrorists feel so empowered! The world is filled with morons who haven't got a clue! Suggest this man start Jihad 101 at the nearest Kindergarten class.


18 posted on 07/08/2005 11:35:54 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"It is time we did something about oil."

Like what—ride subways and buses more?

19 posted on 07/08/2005 11:38:13 PM PDT by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The theory is that angry theologies and genocidal tyrants frustrate economic advancement and breed dementia.

Working for the Seattle Times has much the same effect.

20 posted on 07/09/2005 12:15:38 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson