Posted on 07/13/2005 7:06:55 AM PDT by edcoil
Karl Rove, Whistleblower He told the truth about Joe Wilson.
Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT
Democrats and most of the Beltway press corps are baying for Karl Rove's head over his role in exposing a case of CIA nepotism involving Joe Wilson and his wife, Valerie Plame. On the contrary, we'd say the White House political guru deserves a prize--perhaps the next iteration of the "Truth-Telling" award that The Nation magazine bestowed upon Mr. Wilson before the Senate Intelligence Committee exposed him as a fraud.
For Mr. Rove is turning out to be the real "whistleblower" in this whole sorry pseudo-scandal. He's the one who warned Time's Matthew Cooper and other reporters to be wary of Mr. Wilson's credibility. He's the one who told the press the truth that Mr. Wilson had been recommended for the CIA consulting gig by his wife, not by Vice President Dick Cheney as Mr. Wilson was asserting on the airwaves. In short, Mr. Rove provided important background so Americans could understand that Mr. Wilson wasn't a whistleblower but was a partisan trying to discredit the Iraq War in an election campaign. Thank you, Mr. Rove.
The same can't be said for Mr. Wilson, who first "outed" himself as a CIA consultant in a melodramatic New York Times op-ed in July 2003. (snip)
If there's any scandal at all here, it is that this entire episode has been allowed to waste so much government time and media attention, As for the press corps, rather than calling for Mr. Rove to be fired, they ought to be grateful to him for telling the truth.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
You're right. Besides, Rove's name has already been revealed, so there's absolutely no reason for Miller to refuse to name him. It's not Rove, for sure!
Don't you find it odd that the CIA director wasn't briefed about Wilson's trip before it happened, that Tenet was out of the loop on this sensitive and politically charged mission? I have often wondered if this whole thing was a set-up by an anti-Bush element in the CIA.
Then you aren't reading the WSJ or listening to Ken Mehlman or reading the RNC press releases. They all claim Wilson lied in claiming Cheney sent him.
I'm guessing that there was an awful lot going on that Tenet didn't know about. Remember, Tenet wasn't a 'spy,' he was a 'manager.'
The left took it over.
Where is Joe Wilson? The self-promoter has not been heard from as this issue heats up. This is counter to his very personality. Why doesn't Russert or Blitzer or Larry have him on their shows to elucidate what happened. He is very close to this issue. Where to the hell is he? I think he is laying low because his ass is in a ringer. He's waiting for the hammer to falll.
Cheney DID request that the CIA look into the yellowcake matter. That is established fact.
In response, the CPD DID ask Wilson to go, that is established fact.
The CPD sending Wilson WAS in response to Cheney asking the CIA to look into the matter. That is established fact.
"Mehlman's quotes", that you mentioned, never have Wilson saying that Cheney sent him - even though that's what Mehlman claims they mean.
All of the things I have stated as "established fact" are in Wilson's op-ed piece. Then they are all confirmed in the Senate Intel report.
In other words, any 'false impression' anyone was trying to correct didn't come from Wilson's op-ed or his public statements.
Or maybe there wasn't any false impression.
Tenet's comments are therefore very misleading, because they make it sound like neither he nor Cheney knew anything about the trip prior to its happening, that it originated entirely in the CPD group. Or maybe it's that Cheney floated the idea in general, got the ball rolling, but had no knowledge of the specifics of the trip.
So, neither Cheney nor Tenet knew Wilson had gone, but the trip was an effort by the agency to get an answer to Cheney's questions. And I'm guessing that when Cheney asks you a question you don't know the answer to, you REALLY want to get that answer however you can.
Not from Wilson.
And, of course, before the Novak column, you pretty much only had Wilson' op-ed.
Here ya go...
In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report. While I never saw the report, I was told that it referred to a memorandum of agreement that documented the sale of uranium yellowcake a form of lightly processed ore by Niger to Iraq in the late 1990's. The agency officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice president's office.
You'll find it in What I Didn't Find In Africa, by Joseph C. Wilson IV, where this whole story is said to have begun.
And you'll note that Wilson is evidently alluding to Cheney's questions concerning the "forged documents" -- which didn't come into American possession until some eight months after Wilson sipped his sweet mint tea in Niger.
Wilson clearly identified that he was responding to a specific request from Dick Cheney.
Rove was telling Cooper that Cheney had issued no such request. There were no "forged documents" at that time to even ask about, remember.
Go back and re-read the statement. Wilson clearly identified that he is responding to a specific request from officials at the CIA. That's a big difference that a lot of people seem to miss.
Yes, it is a big difference. And the media was certainly missing it. Most media reports on Wilson alluded to, or strongly suggested, his being sent by the VP's office. Wilson was not correcting these reports.
Moreover, Wilson's op-ed stated that he was responding to Cheney's request for confirmation of documents which subsequently were found to be forged. The fact is those documents wouldn't be in U.S. hands for another eight months after he went to Niger.
Lots of misinformation to wade through. Almost as if it were planted...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.