Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bob Woodward Offers to Serve Judith Miller's Jail Time
Editor & Publisher. com ^ | July 12, 2005 | Joe Strupp

Posted on 07/13/2005 2:19:41 PM PDT by summer

NEW YORK - Bob Woodward has offered to serve some of jailed reporter Judith Miller's time behind bars, and urged others to share her incarceration as well.

Miller, the New York Times reporter held in contempt for refusing to disclose her confidential source in the Valerie Plame case, was ordered to jail last Wednesday and could remain there for four months

Woodward, who appeared on Larry King Live Monday night, said journalists should be willing to help Miller out since she is essentially fighting for all reporters' rights by withholding her confidential source and giving up her freedom. Here is the transcript from the portion of the show:

WOODWARD: No. Clearly, we're not above the law. But frequently, people disobey the law. And when you do so, you have to be willing to accept the consequences. And in this case, the consequences, I guess, are a four-month jail sentence, and Judy Miller's willing to do that, to stand on this principle of trust. You know, I...

KING: You said you would have done it, too?

WOODWARD: I would have done it, too. And in fact, you know, maybe I shouldn't say this, but I will ...

KING: Go ahead.

WOODWARD: ... because it came to mind: If the judge would permit it, I would go serve some of her jail time, because I think the principle is that important, and it should be underscored. It's not a casual idea that we have confidential sources. It is absolutely vital. And I'll bet there are all kinds of reporters out there, if we could divvy up this four-month jail sentence -- I suspect the judge would not permit that, but if he would, I'll be first in line. It's that important to our business.

And this book and Watergate demonstrated, the daily reporting in any newspaper or on CNN illustrates that. And what are you going to do? Are you going to interview all of the public relations people, all of the spokespeople, and that's it? No one else can talk? Imagine, you know, the varnished pablum that would come out.

KING: We do need our Woodwards.

We're going to take a break and come back and go to your phone calls. Bob Woodward offering to serve part of the time for Judith Miller!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: cialeak; jail; miller; woodward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: summer
This stinks. There's an implication here, that someone's jail sentence or punishment is some kind of positive value to the state. It's like he's saying there's a beast to be sated, a volcano to be propitiated, and the identity of the "sacrifice" doesn't really matter, as long as the appetite is fed.

You can't serve someone else's sentence, as if that will somehow placate the offended authority.

21 posted on 07/13/2005 2:26:39 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYS_Eric

Send him to jail, please..


22 posted on 07/13/2005 2:26:48 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: summer
if we could divvy up this four-month jail sentence -- I suspect the judge would not permit that

gee, i wonder why? how about we divvy up everybody's jail sentences between family members?

what about WHY she is being held??!! it isn't going to get her to tell the truth by letting these magnanimous bighearted liberals serve the sentence for her.

but then, i'm guessing the TRUTH is that either joe wilson or miller herself is the source she is "protecting."

23 posted on 07/13/2005 2:27:23 PM PDT by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speedy
the time share concept comes to prison. It's crazy but it just might work.

It might be popular in those minimum security prisons. Those prisons are probably a step up for some people - and they might be happy to do the time. Paging Ebbers!
24 posted on 07/13/2005 2:27:37 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: summer
From James Taranto's Best of the Web Today on OpinionJournal.com:

He suspects the judge would not permit it? How wonderfully clueless! Woodward seems to think the judge is locking up Miller just to be mean to journalists, and any other reporter would suit his purposes just as well.

The actual reason Miller is behind bars is because she has information the judge has deemed important to a criminal investigation. He is jailing her in an effort to induce her to testify. This probably won't end up working, but jailing a succession of celebrity scribes instead certainly would not.

Meanwhile, the New York Sun reports that President Bush issued a statement yesterday calling for the mad mullahs who run Iran to release dissident journalist Akbar Ganji:

"The President calls on all supporters of human rights and freedom, and the United Nations, to take up Ganji's case and the overall human rights situation in Iran," a statement released by the White House yesterday read. "The President also calls on the Government of Iran to release Mr. Ganji immediately and unconditionally and to allow him access to medical assistance."

We'd take Woodward more seriously if he offered to go to jail in Ganji's place.

Maybe someone could forward Taranto's suggestion to Mr. Woodward! ;-)

25 posted on 07/13/2005 2:28:04 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk
Maybe the judge could sentence him to be somebody's butler.

ROTFLMAO...a la "JERRY?" :)
26 posted on 07/13/2005 2:28:34 PM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NYS_Eric
Cheap meaningless gesture

You got that right. How tough is it to offer such a sacrifice, when he knows full well such an offer could never be taken seriously?
27 posted on 07/13/2005 2:28:59 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: summer

While in grad school, I taught some JUCO courses in a large maximum security prison. One of the fundamental lessons of prison is YOUR TIME IS YOUR TIME. No one else can serve your time. Typically as liberals, they don't understand that. And of course they don't understand that we want her in jail until she gives up her information.

Now possibly to help her work on a story while in jail, we could transfer her to Club Gitmo?


28 posted on 07/13/2005 2:30:36 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Well they are better than you or me, and shouldn't have to obey the law in the same way.

After all, they are members of the fourth estate.

29 posted on 07/13/2005 2:30:44 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

I think it's a great idea he can go to jail for all I care.


30 posted on 07/13/2005 2:31:13 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Hmmmmm.....

Speculation is mounting that Miller is protecting herself, that Miller was herself a source of information about Plame that made it to several Bush administration officials and was then recycled to columnist Robert Novak. He, then, disclosed Plame's employment by the CIA and her role in arranging for her husband Joe Wilson's mission to Africa to investigate the Iraq-uranium link.

This would help explain why Miller didn't write a story about the case. It would be difficult for Miller to write a story when she was so deeply involved in how it developed. Disclosure of her role then or now would be extremely embarrassing.

She could be the key to exonerating Bush administration officials of possible violations of the law against knowingly disclosing the identities of covert intelligence agents. If they were simply passing along information from Miller or some other journalist about Joseph Wilson's wife, then they can't be accused of deliberately disclosing classified information about Plame's identity.

The more likely explanation is that Miller is protecting private discussions with administration officials, and that during those discussions she provided or confirmed information about Plame's identity. This would make sense. Both Miller and Plame covered the subject of weapons of mass destruction and it was likely that they knew one another, or at least were aware of each other's work in this field.

Mens News Daily

31 posted on 07/13/2005 2:31:33 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: brivette
>>Send him to jail, please..<<

Ditto!

I'd love to see this fraud in jail...whatever the reason.

32 posted on 07/13/2005 2:31:34 PM PDT by evad (No action to secure borders, No action on judges... NO MONEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Like minds.


33 posted on 07/13/2005 2:31:48 PM PDT by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Bob Woodward in jail means a new book titled,

Bob Woodwood, The New Deep Throat

Dedicated to Bubba and the rest of the guys in Cell Block D.

34 posted on 07/13/2005 2:32:01 PM PDT by hflynn ( Soros wouldn't make any sense even if he spelled his name backwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: summer
Send'm all to GITMO and let them play footsie with the bad boys.
35 posted on 07/13/2005 2:33:28 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
How many ways can you say "Grandstanding"?

Someone hungers to be a victim...

36 posted on 07/13/2005 2:33:33 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
KING: We do need our Woodwards.

You can have yours, Larry. I'll go find my own, thanks.

Everyone knows that journalists' rights take a back seat in certain cases and this is one of them.

37 posted on 07/13/2005 2:35:24 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("What kind of people do they think we are?" - Winston Churchill to Congress, December 1941)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer

I'd much prefer that Woodward serve out Scott Petersons sentence.


38 posted on 07/13/2005 2:35:51 PM PDT by Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

As to Cooper's involvement...maybe Miller set Cooper and Rove up by setting Cooper on the trail of the Cheney/Wilson allegation. Remember, Miller never wrote about Plame and Cooper originally called Rove about a welfare reform story, and only brought up Wilson at the end of the conversation. Seems plausible.


39 posted on 07/13/2005 2:36:26 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth

Sales of his books must be down. He is trying to get some cheap free publicity.

Now, if he said he would go on a hunger strike until the judge releases Ms Miller I would be more impressed. Within a short period of time the country would have one less MSM DemoRat reporter to worry about.


40 posted on 07/13/2005 2:37:54 PM PDT by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson