Some Episcopalian clergy and parishes will join the Catholics. Many Episcopalians will be involved in a Great Schism, joining the World-wide Anglican Community, in order to avoid this atrocity:
Posted on 07/15/2005 8:04:10 AM PDT by Dane
The Episcopal Church Self-Destructs over Homosexuality
Episcopalians Defend the Consecration of a "Gay" Bishop
By Allan Dobras
The Episcopal Church has been flirting with a disastrous schism for the last thirty-five years, and now a formal breakup seems inevitable following an unapologetic June 17–22, 2005, appearance before the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) in Nottingham, England. The purpose of the meeting was to hear the church's defense of its consecration of "gay" Bishop V. Gene Robinson.
Over the years, the denomination continued to hang together as it blundered through several divisive issues while causing its rolls to plummet by about 1.3 million congregants, or nearly 40 percent of its membership. Remarkably, the church had managed to survive clergymen like Bishop John S. Spong, who institutionalized heretical teachings in the denomination, the failed heresy trial of Rt. Reverend Walter Righter, who opened the church to the ordination of homosexual deacons, and the church's persistent embroilment in leftist politics.
Now, ramifications from the consecration of Bishop V. Gene Robinson are sending shockwaves through the Anglican community, and the denomination is on the brink of imploding. The June 2003 election of Rt. Reverend Robinson to the office of bishop was the final straw for the traditionalist-minded American Anglican Council (AAC) and a number of conservative prelates-primarily from Africa-who put pressure on the Worldwide Anglican Communion to respond to what they thought to be contrary to church doctrine.
As a result, in October of 2003, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. Rowan Williams, established a commission to look at life in the Anglican Communion in the light of recent events-at the time, the imminent consecration of the Reverend Robinson as Bishop of New Hampshire and the decision to authorize a service for use in connection with same-sex unions in the Diocese of New Westminster, Canada.
The commission was tasked by the archbishop to "offer advice on finding a way through the situation which currently threatens to divide the Communion." After studying the matter for several months, the commission issued its final report (The Windsor Report) on October 28, 2004, which called upon the Episcopal Church (USA) to:
* Express its regret that the proper constraints of the bonds of affection were breached in the events surrounding the election and consecration of a bishop for the See of New Hampshire. * Pending such expression of regret, those who took part as consecrators of Gene Robinson should be invited to consider in all conscience whether they should withdraw from representative functions in the Anglican Communion. * Effect a moratorium on the election and consent to the consecration of any candidate to the episcopate who is living in a same-gender union until some new consensus in the Anglican Communion emerges.
The commission also called for a moratorium of Rites of Blessing of same-sex unions and recommended that bishops who have authorized such rites in the United States and Canada be invited to express regret that the proper constraints of the bonds of affection were breached by such authorization.
Conservative primates of the Anglican Communion gathered in February 2005 at Newry, in Northern Ireland, at the invitation of the Archbishop of Canterbury to consider the recommendations of the Windsor Report. The primates endorsed the report and encouraged the Anglican Consultative Council to "organize a hearing at its meeting in Nottingham, England, in June 2005 at which representatives of the Episcopal Church (USA) and the Anglican Church of Canada, invited for that specific purpose, may have an opportunity to set out the thinking behind the recent actions of their Provinces."
The Episcopal Church (USA) Responds
During the week of June 20, 2005, representatives of the Episcopal Church (USA) met with the Anglican Consultative Council in Nottingham, England, and presented their response to the Windsor Report in a 135-page document titled "To Set Our Hope On Christ," which was long on superlatives, but devoid of either regret or repentance. In substance, the response was little more than a repeat of the unsubstantiated junk science claims that homosexuality is inborn and unchangeable and the discredited revisionist theology that denies the validity of the biblical record concerning homosexuality.
In a hopelessly convoluted reply to the specific recommendations of the Windsor Report, the American church dismissed the call to express "regret" for their actions or to respect a "moratorium" on the consecration of any additional clergy involved in a same-sex relationship:
* At the present time part of the Church believes that it recognizes members of same-sex affection who are living Christ-like lives of generous self-donation, costly witness, and courageous acts of discipleship in conformity with the pattern Christ establishes for us. And this part of the Church is calling the rest to "come and see" if this isn't in fact the work of the Holy Spirit. . . . "We believe that God takes our differences, which the world would wickedly harden into divisions, and embraces them by the power of Christ and the Spirit within those blessed differences-in-relation of the Divine Persons . . . " * "The experience of the Church as it is lived in different places has something to contribute to the discernment of the mind of Christ for the Church. No one culture, no one period of history has a monopoly of insight into the truth of the Gospel. . . . We wish most deeply to express our loving concern for the good of the whole Church, especially for those Anglicans worldwide who are living in faithful, committed same-sex partnerships, and also for those Anglicans worldwide who do not see how such relationships can be open to God's blessing."
The Canadian Primate, Archbishop Hutchison, expressed regret over strained relationships that its actions have caused and agreed to a moratorium on dioceses authorizing same-sex blessings rites until the General Synod considers the matter.
On June 22, 2005, the Anglican Consultative Council, citing the standard of Christian teaching on matters of human sexuality expressed in the 1998 Lambeth Resolution 1.10, endorsed the Primates' request that "in order to recognize the integrity of all parties, the Episcopal Church (USA) and the Anglican Church of Canada voluntarily withdraw their members from the Anglican Consultative Council for the period leading up to the next Lambeth Conference."
Thus, the Episcopal Church (USA), like a person addicted to hard drugs, cannot give up its romance with homosexuality and instead acquiesced to the relatively mild and inconsequential censure implicit in the ACC request for "voluntary withdrawal" from the council.
The American Anglican Council Calls the EC (USA) Response "Blasphemous."
The reaction from the American Anglican Council (AAC) to the EC (USA) presentation was swift and blunt, calling their defense "shameless" and declaring it was "blasphemous to suggest that the Holy Spirit would lead any Christian to accept or embrace doctrine or behavior contradicted throughout the body of Scripture."
The AAC dismissed out of hand a claim by the church's emissaries that "God designed and created a percentage of the population to be gay." In a sharply worded rebuttal, the ACC said, "It is not established that same-sex attraction is innate [and] God cannot be understood as having created what His revealed Word defines as sinful."
In its concluding statement, the AAC ridiculed their call for "unity in disagreement," and saw only a church in deep distress: "The logical conclusion of [their] argument is that unity is more important than truth. . . . The Episcopal Church is fractured and bleeding; punitive actions against the orthodox abound; and trust has been broken over and over. Additionally, data provided by the Episcopal Church itself demonstrates a church in disarray with a significant number of churches and individuals leaving ECUSA and dioceses experiencing serious budgetary shortfalls. It is most unfortunate that many other bishops representing a radically different view were not included in this ECUSA team."
The EC (USA), having weathered many storms in the past that left it intact but drove its membership into mass exodus, appears to have finally reached the end of the road, and a major breakup of the denomination seems inevitable.
--Al Dobras is a freelance writer on religious and cultural issues and an electronics engineer. He lives in Springfield, Virginia
You gotta be kidding me. Most homos don't live past 40. They're killed off by overdose, disease, and suicide. Unbelievable. If that's blessed, what the hell (literally) does damned mean?
This statement sums up the bankrupt basis most all modern liberal churches hold for their existence.
It certainly is not Christianity.
I find it exasperating that any mainline organization, calling itself Christian, uses their own frivolous imaginings as their rules of "faith and practice" instead of the clear Word of scripture.
Some Episcopalian clergy and parishes will join the Catholics. Many Episcopalians will be involved in a Great Schism, joining the World-wide Anglican Community, in order to avoid this atrocity:
Here's a radical thought: Study the Bible and follow it!
Oh, that's right: Sponge told them they can't trust that book...
Oh you mean the modern Republican party that doesn't endorse abortion, homosexual marriage, tax hikes, keeping the social security staus quo, etc,etc..
Psst, jack jumping over the candlestick there, it seems your Church has been taken over by the democrats, and yet you blame the Republicans.
JMO, you are highly amiss and misguided.
That is a well stated post.
The big inning for the 'Great Falling Away'
My 79 year old mother recently left her ECUSA congregation and now churches with an Anglican church of the Argentine diocese (in Oklahoma, no less). I attended a service where the Bishop of Argentina (an Englishman) spoke. I thought he might not address the 900 lb gorilla in the living room, but to my surprise he absolutly blasted the ECUSA. And gave a much more passionate surmon than I expected.
Good for her and good for them.
Hell, that's what they call it!
Those are the things the Republicans say they stand for and with which I agree but somehow our fearless leaders never quite manage to get done. Its sort of like the Episcopalenas saying they believe in the authority of Holy Scripture ... so long as they can ignore the parts they don't like.
But they always have enough votes to increase government spending, expand the size of the Federal Government, advance the cause of socialism and lead us towards globalism. In just the last five years we have record spending and deficits, 20,000 new Federal TSA employees, the Federal Government in charge of local public education and socialized Medicare Prescription Drugs and it appears we will soon surrender more sovereignty to the WTO via CAFTA which our Republican leaders openly admit is just a stepping stone towards their further globalist agenda. At the same time our Republican leaders seem to embrace and even promote the lawlessness that comes with illegal immigration.
If everyone actually believed that President Bush was an actual conservative, all the conservatives organizations who have been telling us he was a conservative for the past 5 years would not be in such a panic over his pending judicial nomination. The fact that they are panicking reveals that they understand the truth: our leader is just a northeastern liberal Republican who has played minor lip service to conservative issues while governing from the left.
Cultural Marxism???
------
Well with hard radicals like Mao-ary, their brand of government is absolute control, real classic Marxism. And she, and her "quiet" ilk make no bones about it.
"WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THINGS AWAY FROM YOU, FOR THE COMMON GOOD"...God, the vision of Karl Marx reading his Communist Manifesto pops right into mind...
Why even go to church if one is going to follow Satan?
This is what is going on ine the church. People love to follow Satan more than to follow God, and they do not belong in his Kingdom.
I saw this coming YEARS AGO... I formally converted to the Roman Catholic Church years ago. The thing about Anglicanism is that when you're an Anglican (or even when you're anyone other than a Catholic) and you take a look at the Anglican church, you see "Catholic-lite" and you think "it's just like the Catholic church but without the guilt! It's wonderful." Well, once you've been both an Anglican and a Catholic you tend to regard Anglicans as barely Christian.
I went to my high school reunion a few months ago and someone was in seminary to become an Episcopalian priest (his mother is the same) after converting from Methodism. My disdain for that "church" just runs from every pore so the first thing that came out of my mouth was "I used to want to be a priest too until I joined the Church, I mean the *True Church*" which shocked everyone but had the other Catholic's laughing (I went to a Catholic school). Once I realized what I said, I could only apologize for saying it outloud but not for actually saying it.
Why even go to church if one is going to follow Satan?
This is what is going on ine the church. People love to follow Satan more than to follow God, and they do not belong in his Kingdom.
>"I am about to quit the GOP for almost the same reason I quit the Episcopagans. I refuse to become a globalist socialist."<
Agreed. Issues of abortion, the homosexual agenda, U.S. sovereignity, eliminating the IRS, and etc are being taken by the Constitution Party folks.
Many (not all) in the Republican party leadership seem to be content with not rocking the boat.
Oh you mean the modern Republican party that doesn't endorse abortion, homosexual marriage, tax hikes, keeping the social security staus quo, etc,etc..
Your not from Ohio are you? We have a different Republican Party here.
The professorate calls it Cultural Marxism, and so should we.
For my part, it's easy to say what I believe.
I believe I am not an Episcopalian any more.
Fweeutt, you two.
Has there been a pro-abortion bill passed in the last 11 years.
Has there been a Federal bill passed endorsing homosexual marriage.
The answer is no, but you two knew that.
Ya know maybe you two should clean up your own house(i.e the episcopalian church) before complaining about others.
For the record I am not an episcoplian, but raised Catholic.
Oh you mean the modern Republican party that doesn't endorse abortion, homosexual marriage, tax hikes, keeping the social security staus quo, etc,etc..
I wouldn't take that as a slam against the GOP. It's perfectly natural that the leadership concentrates on the "center", as their job is to generate votes. Can you honestly tell me that Ken Mehlman is more conservative than the average freeper?
Yeah, that is why they just build a retirement home for fags in Hollyweird and it only has 100 apartments!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.