Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dead Boys Alive in Trunk for 17 Hours
FOXNews.com ^ | 7/19/2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/19/2005 9:34:10 AM PDT by AbeKrieger

CAMDEN, N.J. — Three boys who suffocated in a car trunk last month were alive for at least 17 hours, slowly succumbing while police searched their neighborhood, a lawyer for the family of one of the boys says. Lawyer Peter M. Villari told The New York Times that officials of the Camden County prosecutor's office went over details of an autopsy report with him, the newspaper reported Tuesday. The boys, ages 5, 6 and 11, disappeared from the yard where they were playing a little after 5 p.m. on June 22. Their deaths were ruled accidental. Relatives searched for the boys for three hours and then called authorities. A two-day search that included dogs, helicopters and boats on the nearby Delaware River ended when the father of one of the boys found them dead in the trunk of an inoperable car sitting just feet from where they had been playing. The autopsy report, which has not been released publicly, found that the boys died between 10:30 a.m. on June 23 and 2:30 a.m. on June 24, Villari said. That estimate was based on fluid and tissue samples and weather data, he said. Villari told the newspaper that responsibility for the deaths is now "squarely on the shoulders of the police." "I think the numbers speak for themselves," he said. "They were certainly alive when the police arrived and certainly well after the search started." Villari did no immediately return a call seeking additional comment Tuesday. The prosecutors' office had no immediate comment.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: camden; missing; police; suffocation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last
To: linkinpunk

"I'll put you on my prayer list."

I will do the same since some of these cops you want punished are probably Christians as well (If you are a Christian).

You go after these officers (Who did not do anything intentionally wrong) with great zeal that they should "pay" for what they did. How Christian of you!





141 posted on 07/19/2005 11:44:29 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

I'm not blaming the kids here but I don't understand why they weren't making noise trying to be heard - especially during the first few hours.


142 posted on 07/19/2005 11:47:05 AM PDT by proudofthesouth (Boycotting movies since 1988)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker
IF memory serves, the state stepped in and cleaned a few things up, (gave them a ton of money to try and develop the waterfront) but they've got their own police (make that "police") force and a mayor (usually in various stages of conviction).  A third world country you don't need a passport to go see.
 
Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

143 posted on 07/19/2005 11:49:46 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: tfecw
Can the cops start poking around in people's cars and houses looking for kids with out a warrant? If my neighbors kids go missing while I'm at work, are the cops allowed to pop my trunk and/or search my home?

Intriguing question, but it seems pretty safe to say that no search warrants of any kind would be legally necessary once a citizen invites the police into a missing person(s) search. At that point the cops have been "hired on," so to speak, to help search, and no property would be exempt from their examination.

Clearly no one, neither the police nor the family, asked the commonsense question "Did anybody check the trunk?" The question then becomes who's responsible for not asking that question and carrying out that task. The police, who just arrived on the scene and had no prior knowledge of any of the principals involved or of the property? Or the family, who knew the boys play habits intimately, knew the environs, and had been looking at that abandoned car in the yard for years? It seems abuntantly clear to me that any parent with half a brain would search any and all spaces on the property big enough to contain a child within the first twenty minutes of becoming aware that a child was missing.

The police may have made a flawed assumption. I'm willing to admit that much. They may have wrongly assumed that the parents and other responsible adults in the neighborhood had half a brain.

In the hierarchy of responsibiliy for this tragedy, the parents hold the top position by a mile. It turns my stomach to find that they are now looking to get paid by the taxpayers for their own negligence.

144 posted on 07/19/2005 11:53:53 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The question isn't how long they searched, the question is how effective was their search. I'll state again, my point is that it would seem the police erred in not conducting a thorough search of the vehicle. However, it would be interesting to learn whether or not the police were even authorized to search the trunk.


145 posted on 07/19/2005 11:55:57 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

Agreed. It is hardly a gem of a city.


146 posted on 07/19/2005 11:57:10 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: PaulaB

"I agree.....parents are responsible

1. Had the kids played in this trunk before?"


I agree too. Geez, too much expectations are placed on Americas over burdened law enforcement and at the same time the insane negligent schizo citizens of America despise the very same law enforcement they want to wipe their whiney poopy butts 24-7.

If those kids had climbed into the trunk of a parked squad car the parents would being sipping frozen strawberry margaritias on some exotic beach with their windfall law$uit.


147 posted on 07/19/2005 11:57:41 AM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

I just hate this story.


148 posted on 07/19/2005 11:58:41 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide

So true...and hey I love your page!!!! :)


149 posted on 07/19/2005 11:59:58 AM PDT by PaulaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

The police were called 3 hours after the search began. The car probably wasn't the first thing that was searched. So in reality, the 3 boys could have been unconscious by that time and not making any noise at all. Hindsight is always a great teacher, the trunk should have been searched by someone, albeit the police or parent. The police should not be held liable for this tragedy.


150 posted on 07/19/2005 12:00:06 PM PDT by Cate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2
I'm finding it sort of hard reading much more of this post. Shockingly poor police work and parenting. If my 4 year old nephew went missing for 30 seconds I would rip open a Kleenex box looking for him.
151 posted on 07/19/2005 12:03:58 PM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: winodog

It said they were alive for 17 hours and then they suffocated. I have been inside many trunks and one might die of dehydration, but not suffocation.


152 posted on 07/19/2005 12:07:32 PM PDT by auggy ( http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/THISWILLMAKEYOUPROUD.HTML)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
The question isn't how long they searched, the question is how effective was their search.

According to you, since they failed to find the children, their search was ineffective.

Shouldn't cops be required to search until the missing child is found?

153 posted on 07/19/2005 12:16:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wow, you are really grasping. Again, I'll note for you my point- it would seem that the police erred by not conducting a more thorough search of the vehicle. If you mean to ask about other cases in all recorded history, then the answer to your strawman of a question is, as you are aware, there are unsolved cases and each case depends on variables that the police should thoroughly investigate.


154 posted on 07/19/2005 12:30:24 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
I'll note for you my point- it would seem that the police erred by not conducting a more thorough search of the vehicle.

Which sat in the front yard of the mother's house, unlocked, for the whole world to search, including the mother.

They probably never expected the kids to be IN THE %#$$@ FRONT YARD FIVE FEET FROM WHERE THEY WERE SPEAKING WITH THE %#&^@ MOTHER!!!!

Are you saying the cops are more responsible for this tragedy than the mother?

155 posted on 07/19/2005 12:38:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
No. HAH. Okay, now I know you are just pulling my leg. Re-read (or read for the first time) my posts to you. I agree with you- the parents are to blame. I have also pointed out that it seems the police erred in not being more thorough when searching the vehicle. Understand that does not mean the police are to blame for something the parents could have / should have prevented. Nor does it mean that I think the police should pay a monetary award to the parents. It means that the police now have an opportunity to correct the way they conduct such investigations so that the next time, God forbid, they will hopefully save a life or three. Where we differ is that that I think the police take steps to do do better job and you think the police are always irreproachable. Beyond that, your comments are flying about in circles, pell-mell. I'm done with you. Bye now.
156 posted on 07/19/2005 12:55:00 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
"Three boys who suffocated in a car trunk last month were alive for at least 17 hours, slowly succumbing while police searched their neighborhood, a lawyer for the family of one of the boys says."

Maybe the "lawyer for the family" would like to sue...THE FAMILY?

157 posted on 07/19/2005 12:59:07 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Why on Earth should they? Because the police didn't use his x-ray vision to see inside the trunk?

I would love to hear you take the excuses of officers working for you if you were the police chief.

"How was I supposed to find the kids in the car, Sarge? I ain't got no x-ray vision."

If the cops missed a concealed gun when searching a killer: "Sorry, Sarge. How was I supposed to see under his shirt? I ain't Superman with that x-ray vision thing!"

158 posted on 07/19/2005 1:15:28 PM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
How long are they supposed to search?

how long would you want them to search for your missing child?

It's obvious you are not exactly civic minded or logical.

159 posted on 07/19/2005 1:17:12 PM PDT by SunnyUsa (No man really becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Are you saying the cops are more responsible for this tragedy than the mother?

No, the cops are only responsible from the time they showed up and took over.

160 posted on 07/19/2005 1:29:34 PM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson