Posted on 07/20/2005 9:31:45 PM PDT by neverdem
Roberts nomination, how do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
I love thee with the depth and breadth and height my soul can reach. I love thee freely, as men strive for right. I love thee because this is the way government is supposed to work. President Bush consulted widely, moved beyond the tokenism of identity politics and selected a nominee based on substance, brains, careful judgment and good character.
I love thee because John G. Roberts is the face of today's governing conservatism.
Conservatives who came of age in the 1960's did so in an intensely ideological time when it was arduous to be on the right. People from that generation are more likely to have a dissident mentality, to want to storm the ramparts of the liberal establishment, to wade in to vanquish their foes in the war of ideas.
But John Roberts didn't enter Harvard until the fall of 1973. He missed all that sturm und drang, so he lacks, his former colleagues say, the outsider/dissident mentality. By the time he came of age, it was easier for a conservative to be comfortable in mainstream institutions, without feeling embattled or spoiling for a fight.
Roberts has chosen to live in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, not the Virginia ones, where the political climate is 30 degrees to the right. He submitted his wedding notice to the wedding page of The New York Times, which is perceived as alien turf by ideological conservatives.
Roberts is a conservative practitioner, not a conservative theoretician. He is skilled in the technical aspects of the law, knowledgeable about business complexities (that's why he was hired to take on Microsoft) and rich in practical knowledge. He is principled and shares the conservative preference for judicial restraint, but doesn't think at the...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Wow!
This guy is govenment man all the way. We need a real conservative originalist. Mr Robers is NOT that man.
This guy is govenment man all the way. We need a real conservative originalist. Mr Robers is NOT that man.
Getting David Brooks to back Roberts is no endorsement.
That hack is the leftist's 'conservative' poodle, in the way that Safire was for years.
What do you mean by "government man?"
If the faux Shakespeare style doesn't annoy, this is pretty good.
The faux Shakespeare style annoys.
What I was going to say...
I've never seen a piece about a "competent Liberal." I guess there isn't any.
Seems longun45 is one of those embattled outsiders to whom government is evil regardless of who runs it. People like him feel that government serves no purpose, other than to guard our borders and repair the highways. They dont believe that those who serve in high government positions at major financial cost to themselves deserve any credit for their service. Roberts gave up an income of over a million dollars a year in a major law firm to go on the Federal bench at about 100K per year. But to the old time embattled outsider he is just a government hack who is out to make the outsiders life a living hell.
NY Times Kudos? Now I'm starting to worry. Ann was right!
Non-government is better than conservative government, or rather it is the very definition of a pure conservative administration (making the term an oxymoron - while "liberal administration" is redundant).
However since government is here to stay, I'll settle for electing conservatives to office.
I'm not worried if it's from a Brooks or Tierney OpEd column. OpEd columns from Rich, Dowd, Krugman or Herbert, like masthead editorials from the New York Times Editorial Board, are almost always reliably dimissed 99.44 percent of the Time.
OpEd Contributors, like today's by Jeffrey Rosen, are more like ships passing in the night never to be paseed again, and may be useful for insights like the occasional Kristof or Friedman OpEd column.
N.B. Rosen has always struck me as a leftist.
paseed = passed
The poem is "HOW DO I LOVE THEE, LET ME COUNT THE WAYS" and he quote a lot of it, but changes things a bit.
Thank you for the correction. My major was chemistry. My first degree was a B.S.
Brooks is the NYT's token Republican, who also writes for Weekly Standard. Not to worry.
I wasn't trying to embarrass you, nor was I being petty, but such errors sort of drive me up a wall. Thanks for being so gallant and pleasant about it all.
That and the military. What else do you think they should be doing, giving welfare?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.