Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT: U.S. Economy Grew at a Strong Rate Last Quarter
New York Times ^ | July 29, 2005 | VIKAS BAJAJ

Posted on 07/29/2005 9:31:38 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

The economy grew at an annual rate of 3.4 percent in the second quarter on the strength of consumer spending, investments and exports, the government reported today.

The report from the Commerce Department showed broad and sustained growth in areas like software, housing, car sales and government spending, with few signs of inflation. It was the ninth straight quarter of growth exceeding 3 percent.

As expected, the gross domestic product slowed from the first quarter when it increased by 3.8 percent. Economists were expecting second-quarter growth of 3.5 percent, and it appeared much of the shortfall was caused by businesses slowing production so they could work off large inventories of cars and other goods. The change in inventories subtracted 2.32 percentage points from the second-quarter growth figure.

Equipment and software sales soared, climbing 11 percent, and homebuilding grew at a brisk 9.8 percent pace, another indication that the hot housing market is playing a starring role in this economy. (Sales of new and existing homes both hit records in June.)

"It's kind of boring in a way, the economy is in great shape," said Bill Zadrozny, chief executive of Siemens Financial Services, which lends money to businesses for expansions and investments.

"There has been a lull of some sort but nothing unusual. This is typical of what happens going into the summer months," he added.

For the first time in a year and a half, the nation's trade balance contributed positively to the economy as exports rose and imports fell. Until now, imports have been rising faster than exports making trade, on balance, a drag on G.D.P.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushrecovery; bushsfault; economy; gdp

1 posted on 07/29/2005 9:31:38 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

"Worst economy since Hoover!"

Even the NYT is grudgingly starting to admit that that's wrong.


2 posted on 07/29/2005 9:33:30 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

It was the ninth straight quarter of growth exceeding 3 percent.

WE'RE DOOMED, I TELLS YA! DOOMED!

3 posted on 07/29/2005 9:34:33 AM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

But, but, but...

Rove, Enron, Social Security, Iraq er WATERGATE...

Wonder what the dems will say about a 9th straight quarter of 3% growth? Heh, heh...

Thank God, Kerry didn't win or we'd be hearing how the baffoon turned around the economy.


4 posted on 07/29/2005 9:34:45 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

But but but her thighness was just in Aspen ridiculing the President for saying the economy was strong.


5 posted on 07/29/2005 9:46:08 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

"Her Thighness," lol...that term could be used for 99% of the democrat women I know...

I bet you're talking about TherAYZah? Or is it sHrillary?


6 posted on 07/29/2005 9:48:18 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Comparing similar time periods in the last two administrations.

Bush Clinton +/-

2003q1 1.7 1995q1 1.1 +0.6
2003q2 3.7 1995q2 0.7 +3
2003q3 7.2 1995q3 3.3 +3.9
2003q4 3.6 1995q4 3.0 +0.6
2004q1 4.3 1996q1 2.9 +1.4
2004q2 3.5 1996q2 6.7 -3.2
2004q3 4.0 1996q3 3.4 +0.6
2004q4 3.3 1996q4 4.8 -1.5
2005q1 3.8 1997q1 3.1 +0.7
2005q2 3.4 1997q2 6.2 -2.8

AVERAGE 3.9 Bush, 3.5 Clinton, Bush economy is +.3 on average better than the Clinton economy.

So, the US economy has grown MORE on average during the comparable time between the present and last administrations. What about those roaring 90s? What happened?

Who knew?
7 posted on 07/29/2005 9:48:55 AM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
In response to the usual negativity from her Thighness, $inator Hildebea$t.

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

8 posted on 07/29/2005 9:53:46 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
It was shrillary who was invited to Aspen.

Needless to say, Mikulski comes to mind.

9 posted on 07/29/2005 9:58:20 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

And of all places to give a speech about "bad" economy--Aspen!? Yeah, I bet a lot of downtrodden out-of-work factory workers attended. What is the phrase...Limousine...


10 posted on 07/29/2005 10:00:58 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Basia Mikulski is one scary woman.


11 posted on 07/29/2005 10:01:01 AM PDT by Clemenza (Life Ain't Fair, GET OVER IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
That was the forum where she referred to President Bush as Alfred E. Neumann.....what me worry.

It was typical of her low class status.

12 posted on 07/29/2005 10:14:55 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

I continue to believe if she is the nominee in 08, we win BIG.


13 posted on 07/29/2005 10:17:03 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
This is the second article in just as many days by the same writer at the NY Slimes touting the strength of the economy. The real miracle is that he is still employed with the Slimes.
14 posted on 07/29/2005 10:17:26 AM PDT by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Proposed NY Times and Moveon.org slogans:

Worst economy in human history!!!

Worst economy since caveman days....
[oh, wait, that's what they're going back to in Cuba, Zimbabwe, Myanmar, and other commie paradise lands.....]

OK, how about:

Worst economy since 1837!!!!


15 posted on 07/29/2005 10:17:37 AM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I'll tell ya, Bush is a genius every time. They can't complain about the economy now (not saying they won't tho). Liberal losers!


16 posted on 07/29/2005 10:19:07 AM PDT by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Krugman must have been on vacation.


17 posted on 07/29/2005 4:00:06 PM PDT by MattinNJ (Allen/Pawlenty in 08-play the map.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Unfortunately I have a liberal family that refuses to belief the economy is good while a Republican is in the White House.

Still, business is booming for my company and we are working lots and lots of OT.

18 posted on 07/29/2005 4:47:09 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

9 consecutive quarter of 3% or better GDP growth, not since 1986 has this happened and it never happened during the Clinton adminstration


19 posted on 07/29/2005 4:48:24 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tarpon

The economy under Clinton was very inconsistent from quarter to quarter.

One quarter we'd have 6-7% GDP growth, the next 2%, then back to 5%...it was a sign that businesses couldnt gauge demand in the economy properly


20 posted on 07/29/2005 4:50:23 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson