NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN

Drudge Report ^ | August 3, 2005 | Matt Drudge

[Steve_Seattle]

"Blond hair is not unusual in the upper crust of Latin America."

I've also noticed a lot of semi-redheads down south of the border. And the women on the covers of the Hispanic tabloids are often very white looking.

[TomB]

Rush bump

[The G Man]

Hey, here's a picture of the adoption broker:

:-)

[rwa265]

"What is the difference between the NYT and the National Enquirer?"

The Enquirer doesn't pretend they are doing straight reporting?

[McGavin999]

Just when you think it's not possible for them to sink any lower, they surprise you with something like this.

[EDINVA]

"and exactly what is the nytimes trying to find?"

as noted elsewhere, both children are blondes (offspring of Nazis no doubt) from Latin America ... so the Slimes will try to find some entry where the couple requested WHITE/BLONDE children to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Roberts and wife are typical Republican bigots.

"this is total crap"

no kidding!

[saveliberty]

Check the tagline

[BulletBobCo]

The NYT will next be posting that "Bat Boy" is claiming to be the long lost child of the Roberts.

[Diddle E. Squat]

The kids were dressed perfectly, unlike the womans field hockey team, whose members mostly wore flip-flops to meet the President. I guess some fashinista thought the kids would look better in hip huggers and middies.

Uh oh...

Team Sparks Flap Over Flip-Flops at White House

Post Goes for the Jugular of Roberts' Children - (how tacky, but how predictable!)

And at 761 posts:

CUTE PHOTO! When John Roberts is nominated for the Supreme Court, his [young] son John dances!

[cyborg]

It's a color pecking order. You'll find it wherever the Spanish have gone (or Portuguese for that matter). I would have never guessed his children were adopted which was maybe the point of him going to a Latin American country (easier) and finding two fair looking children (less questions asked!).

[CFC__VRWC]

What's unusual is that Drudge named the reporter involved..there is another agenda at work here..

Yep - the Times wanted this made public - now the question becomes why. So far the intimidation angle is the one that makes the most sense.

[katieanna]

This is the worst of gutter politics I've heard. Leave the babies alone. This repulsive action of the Times has just secured the confirmation of Judge Roberts(even though it was not their intent).

[Fudd Fan]

"The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency."

The Slimes wouldn't know "decency" if it bit their collective arses. There are no words bad enough to call them. This is all they have "on" Roberts? The only good thing to come out of it has to be it will bite the demonicRATs in THEIR arses, I pray it does.

[cyborg]

LOL!!!

[topher]

Ah! The New York Times will declare them to be orphans that could never be adopted (like the Tsunami farce of the New York Times-Trash Tabloid -- preventing the baby of a couple from being re-united from its parents because of a story fabricated that the baby was really an orphan -- a clear case of newspaper generating an irresponsible story that almost destroyed a family).

[EDINVA]

"What is the difference between the NYT and the National Enquirer? "

The Enquirer is more trustworthy?

[JFC]

The left is out to self distruct. They can not handle life on the second row.

[doug from upland]

New York Times:
229 W. 43rd St., New York, NY 10036,
Phone: 212-556-1234, Fax: 212-556-3690, DC Bureau phone: 202-862-0300,
Email: letters@nytimes.com

[Steve_Seattle]

"The Enquirer doesn't pretend they are doing straight reporting?"

Actually, The Enquirer has changed a lot in recent years, and most of the stuff in there is straight news, albeit mostly gossipy, and generally reasonably accurate. It shouldn't be confused with the Weekly World News or The Star.

[kellynla]

Well I'm sorry but I think that has to be the chicken shittest thing I have ever heard of!
And I will be calling those arseholes at the NYT and reading them the "riot act!"

Here is a couple of fine people who opened their hearts and homes to a little boy and girl and adopted them.

AND THE ARSEHOLES AT THE NYT want to stick their noses in it!!

THAT'S THE LOWEST!!!