Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU backs Wiccan suit
The Washington Times ^ | 8-10-05 | Dionne Walker

Posted on 08/10/2005 11:25:50 AM PDT by JZelle

RICHMOND -- Civil liberties lawyers have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to allow a Wiccan priestess to offer prayers before a public board's meetings. Cynthia Simpson was turned down in 2002 when she asked the Chesterfield Board of Supervisors to add her name to the list of people who customarily open the board's meetings with a religious invocation. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the suburban Richmond county. In their petition, received by the court yesterday, American Civil Liberties Union lawyers accuse the federal appeals court of trying to "obscure with legal smoke and mirrors" Chesterfield's preference for mainline religions. "Although Establishment Clause jurisprudence may be beset with conflicting tests, uncertain outcomes and ongoing debate, one principle has never been compromised ... that one religious denomination cannot be officially preferred over another," ACLU attorneys wrote in their 13-page filing. County officials said they had the right to limit the prayers to Judeo-Christian beliefs and religions based on a single god.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: aclu; chesterfield; churchandstate; lawsuit; vaaclu; virginia; wiccan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-210 next last
To: exile

"Actually, I'm Agnostic. There may be a "magical entity" out there, maybe not. I don't know. As I said before, I'm just a guy who hates hippies."

LOL ok exile, thanks for the honest reply. I'm not real fond of the whole hippie ethic myself, although there is this one little dread-locked gal down the street from me....WOW


61 posted on 08/10/2005 12:45:24 PM PDT by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

You know, I'm going to have to side with the ACLU on this one (I know, I know, I'm going to burn for this); the government cannot favor one religion over another. If they allow one religious group to offer prayers before a meeting, then in all fairness they have to offer that opoortunity to all relgious groups.


62 posted on 08/10/2005 12:45:33 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Understood. Blessed be.
Slainte mhor agus a h-uile beannachd duibh

Doc


63 posted on 08/10/2005 12:46:09 PM PDT by Dawsonville_Doc (Moving to NC as fast as I can...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

Well, we aren't talking about freedom of speech.

We are talking about saying a prayer at a public meeting.

It seems that some of you are saying that at public meetings, we want prayer, and we want it to be Christian prayer.

And if another religion asks for that same opportunity, what do you say to them?


64 posted on 08/10/2005 12:49:32 PM PDT by Madeleine Ward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: ndt

So will witnesses just bring along to court whatever it is that they want to swear on?

Or will the courts be required to have on hand any and all possible items that a witness would require before they could be sworn in?

I think the way to go is simply to forgoe the swearing in and use the threat of perjury prosecution against lying.

The same goes for eliminating prayers before begining public meetings.

It's going to end up going this way, eventually, since we're no longer a culturally united people.


65 posted on 08/10/2005 12:52:45 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
If any official member of the body wants to identify themselves as a Wiccan, then Wiccan prayers might be appropriate. Until then, they really aren't, are they?

Sure they are, if any member of the community identifes himself as a Wiccan. The board represents the community, not just itself. That's the relevant "body."

As much as I hate to agree with them, the ACLU is actually right on this one. If the Founders wanted religious freedom only for Christians and Jews, they could have done so in the Constitution. They, in their wisdom, did not.

66 posted on 08/10/2005 12:54:37 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
You are a complete idiot if you need to do debate the wisdom in allowing wiccan prayer in our government.

Why? You make your proclamation as if it was the last word on the subject, but you don't offer a rationale. And, the ad hominem was really uncalled for.

67 posted on 08/10/2005 12:55:44 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro

The swearing on the Koran is an interesting issue since apparently it is OK in their religion to lie to the infidels.


68 posted on 08/10/2005 12:56:18 PM PDT by Madeleine Ward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward
"And if another religion asks for that same opportunity, what do you say to them?"

I'd say as soon as enough legislators here ask to have that "other religion's" people speak, we'll get them in here. But for now, few if any want to listen to that person. That's what I'd say to them. The invocation isn't done to promote the speaker or his affiliate, it's done because the majority of the legislators obviously feel it helps them in performance of their duties. In which case they should have who they want.

69 posted on 08/10/2005 12:57:47 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward
The swearing on the Koran is an interesting issue since apparently it is OK in their religion to lie to the infidels.

That's my understanding, too.

70 posted on 08/10/2005 12:57:59 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward; JZelle

Just my opinion, of course... If city officials decide to open a meeting with prayer, it will be a prayer that those city officials believe has meaning.

If those officials are muslims, it will probably be a muslim prayer. If they are Christians and Jews, it will probably be a preacher or rabbi leading the prayer. If they are in private, one of the officials might lead the prayer himself, but he probably won't do that in public.

I doubt those officials have any faith in the efficacy of a wiccan prayer, so it would make no sense for them to ask for such a prayer. That would not stop a wiccan from praying on their behalf, though. Asking for prayer is not establishing a religion, but it is meaningless to ask for a prayer you have no faith in.

When you find wiccans on the city council, they will probably want a wiccan prayer spoken. Since that would probably offend the non-wiccans on the council, they will probably discontinue the practice of public prayer. Its human. You may not like it, but you have to leave room for humans to be human. You have surely figured out by now that its pointless to force your beliefs on the majority.

I am often in the minority, and it doesn't upset me. I am not offended if the majority does not agree with me, I would be shocked if they did.


71 posted on 08/10/2005 12:58:52 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: skip_intro
All of them.

Yes, actually. That';s what the Founders gave us.

The government doesn't have the power to determine the turth of any religion (except, of course, for the IRS!).

Once a faith has been established as such, it must be treated the same as all other faiths. It must be given the same access given to other faiths. If you give Protestants the right to speak before meetings, you can't deny Catholics the same right, nor may you deny Scientologists, nor Jews, nor Pentacostals, nor Congregationalists, nor Wiccans that right. All are equally "valid" for the purposes of the government.

72 posted on 08/10/2005 1:03:54 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: highball

The founders gave us a blueprint by which to build and govern a nation that respects the individual balancing that against the public good.

We have to use it wisely. And while I don't like the idea of every religion under the sun offering prayers at our public meetings, I don't think you can just restrict such prayers to Christians.

I'm still waiting to read a response that would explain to any person of a non-Christian faith why their prayer cannot be said at public meeting but mine can.


73 posted on 08/10/2005 1:03:54 PM PDT by Madeleine Ward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: highball
Sure they are, if any member of the community identifes himself as a Wiccan. The board represents the community, not just itself. That's the relevant "body."

That's incorrect actually, the benediction in such a forum directly represents the Board itself.

74 posted on 08/10/2005 1:10:57 PM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward
I'm still waiting to read a response that would explain to any person of a non-Christian faith why their prayer cannot be said at public meeting but mine can.

Just because someone claims to follow another faith doesn't mean that we can recognize it as a religion. Wicca is one that clearly fails that test in our society.

75 posted on 08/10/2005 1:12:27 PM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: exile
Not knowing what I'm talking about has never stopped me before. I'm just a guy who hates hippies.

Cartman, is that you? : )
76 posted on 08/10/2005 1:18:15 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Abolishing group prayer by elected representatives is logical?

Yes. What is the logic behind having a group prayer in the first place? As I asked before, aren't these people capable of praying on their own? In fact, if I'm not mistaken, didn't Jesus have a few words to say about public prayer?
77 posted on 08/10/2005 1:20:50 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Wicca is one that clearly fails that test in our society.

What is the test and how does Wicca fail it? Does Scientology pass? How about Hinduism? or Bahai?
78 posted on 08/10/2005 1:22:45 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
In their petition, received by the court yesterday, American Civil Liberties Union lawyers accuse the federal appeals court of trying to "obscure with legal smoke and mirrors" Chesterfield's preference for mainline religions

That's about right, the ACLU prefers the devil to God.

79 posted on 08/10/2005 1:26:53 PM PDT by oldbrowser (You lost the election.........get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
"the benediction in such a forum directly represents the Board itself."

But, as I said, the Board represents the community. These are public meetings of a governmental agency. They cannot discriminate against any segment of the community when granting another segment special access.

80 posted on 08/10/2005 1:31:43 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson