Posted on 08/12/2005 6:15:22 AM PDT by clifcrds
seeBS is at it again. I just walked by a TV that had the morning show on and they had a little 15 second snipit of Cindy Sheehan on. It was a video clip of her kneeling by a grave (don't know whose garve). The news commentator said something to the affect that she is still camped out at Crawford Texas awaiting to meet with Predident Bush, but so far he has refused to meet with her.
There you have it again - the left handed version of the story without all the details. A story without the truth can be just as damaging as a lie! Or just as damaging as a true story based on false documents.
ABC did a loving number on Mother Sheehan yesterday evening. They were balanced, of course, they had a teeny critical snippet from Pat Buchanan.
I hear that some of her immediate family is against her on this.
He has more important things to do that meet with this lunatic...Besides, he already did meet with her once. How many times does she get? I haven't gotten to meet with him yet!
The longer she stays, the dumber it becomes. The networks need to move on..Then she would stop. It's all for the cameras.
They say she is going to be on the cover of People. That's it, I will not buy that trash.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
I am sure she will have a book to follow
*** Cindy Sheehan is standing in front of the wrong house **
Think about this.
1. Cindy Sheehan lost her son in Iraq, and yes, she might be expected to lash out in anger.
2. We are in Iraq largely because of the events on 9/11.
3. If 9/11 doesn't happen, do we even go into Iraq? Absolutely not.
4. 9/11 could have been prevented. We knew all about the risks presented by at least four of the hijackers, including the cell leader Mohammad Atta.
5. 9/11 did happen because Jamie Gorelick, under the direction of Bill Clinton, erected the "wall" that prevented vital information about these four hijackers from reaching the F.B.I.
Cindy Sheehan, along with the rest of the useless MSM, needs to connect the dots and maybe they will see what a normal reasonable person would see... that the dots lead directly to Bill Clinton and Jamie Gorelick.
Cindy, if you want to talk to your son's killers, the ones who precipitated the series of events that eventually let do your son's demise, you need to head to upstate New York, here's the address for you: 15 Old House Lane, Chappaqua NY 10514.
I thought it was illegal to stalk the president.
When are people going to realize that she doesn't just want to meet with the President? Which I doubt she really does. She uses that excuse to advance her own agenda (and that of Code Pink, Move On, etc.).
At first I felt sorry for her. Thought maybe these lefty organizations had taken advantage of her grief. But she knows exactly what's she's doing. She obviously doesn't care that her estranged husband doesn't support her dragging her son's name through this. I wonder how her surviving children feel. Are any of them down there with her?
The contents of the letter was on Drudge yesterday. Her family does want her to knock it off - they know she is using her son's death to further her left wing ideology. Too bad most of the MSM is not telling the whole story.
The thing about seeing that small snipit on seeBS this a while ago - IF I totally relied on the MSM for my news, I would have come away with a "Michael Moore" view of the story. Weren't subliminal messages outlawed in the 1950's?
And of course the MSM would not want to bother with such trivialities as the revelation Atta was identified a full year prior to 911...
the "grave" is a makeshift graveyard created by Cindy's handlers of some crosses and one of them "happened" to have Casey's name on it. (think Clinton and stones to make a cross on Normandy beach)
I think it was insensitive to the non-Christians that died in Iraq to use crosses to represent them.
They probably also got in trouble for that from their ACLU brethren...simple stone tablets would have raised less questions but the leftists rarely think through these emotional issues.
When it is pointed out that he met with her in June of 2004, I presume the answer by her and the MSM is "Oh, that was last year." Jeeez
That's OK, nobody really cares about this story except the extreme left. And they don't care about Crackpot Cindy or her son, they care about trying to make Bush look bad. Too bad this scene will backfire on the left as well. As more comes out about Crackpot Cindy and her looney left backers, the more ridiculous she looks.
The signer of the family letter, along with web-posting conservative columnists, has been receiving hate mail and threats from the moonbat group whose words seem to have mainly four letters. For one particually nasty exchange, see Michelle Malkin's blog here:
http://www.michellemalkin.com/ (warning: graphic language!)
The propaganda might work for those in the "blue pockets" of America but in the "red pockets" Miss Cindy's act is not playing well.
At least the "red pocket" in which I reside in.
Anybody else hear their friends talk about the fraud and propaganda the media is portraying?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.