Skip to comments.
She's So Cool, So Smart, So Beautiful: Must Be a Girl Crush
New York Times ^
| August 11, 2005
| STEPHANIE ROSENBLOOM
Posted on 08/13/2005 1:35:10 AM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I laugh every time I look at it. There's just something so human about that picture.
21
posted on
08/13/2005 3:50:55 AM PDT
by
Ajnin
(I)
To: Ajnin
LOL
Humor is rooted in reality.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
So, you're saying that Ruth and Naomi may have been the first "girl crush" situation? Good grief, Charlie Brown.
":^(
23
posted on
08/13/2005 4:07:03 AM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: nickcarraway
24
posted on
08/13/2005 4:12:18 AM PDT
by
jws3sticks
(Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
To: nickcarraway
Sheesh. You can't make this stuff up.
25
posted on
08/13/2005 4:34:33 AM PDT
by
RippleFire
("It's a joke, son!")
To: willstayfree
They actually think this trash helps sell their paper? So boring! I suspect the author, if not a homosexual, is active in advancing the homosexual agenda.
Was this the same guy who coined the word "metrosexual"? What a waste of pulp.
26
posted on
08/13/2005 4:40:16 AM PDT
by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: Jaysun
What a steaming pile. Why? As a female, I find it to be very true. And very sad.
27
posted on
08/13/2005 5:31:05 AM PDT
by
Desdemona
(Music Librarian and provider of cucumber sandwiches, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary. Hats required.)
To: LibFreeOrDie
"Another episode from the New York Times' continuing series of "Lifestyles of the Shallow and Stupid..."
Tell me about it! This sort of emotion is appropriate to the 9 to 15yr age group. These "adults" are seriously emotionally retarded.
28
posted on
08/13/2005 5:51:26 AM PDT
by
TalBlack
To: AntiGuv
29
posted on
08/13/2005 6:01:52 AM PDT
by
bethelgrad
(for God, country, the Marine Corps, and now the Navy Chaplain Corps OOH RAH!)
To: nickcarraway
Well, you can tell who actually read the article and understood it vice the folks who had a knee-jerk reaction at the headline or lead.
30
posted on
08/13/2005 6:05:13 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Social scientists suspect such emotions are part of women's nature, feelings that evolution may have favored because they helped women bond with one another and work cooperatively."
Evolution of emotion? Really? I wonder what the genetic structure of that looks like? Nice "just-so story" about the evolutionary advantages. The evolution of cooperation.
31
posted on
08/13/2005 6:14:52 AM PDT
by
Aloysius88
(tagline has suffered dain bramage)
To: AntiGuv
Also, Maybe because there are at least 10 righteous people still left. Genesis 18:32
32
posted on
08/13/2005 7:35:49 AM PDT
by
seemoAR
To: nickcarraway
Must be an ad for that Lifetime show with beautiful lesbians...
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
33
posted on
08/13/2005 7:43:20 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: nickcarraway
"I'm immediately nervous around her," Ms Buice said. "I stammer around her, and it's definitely because I think she's supercool."Yep, that sounds very adult.
34
posted on
08/13/2005 7:44:17 AM PDT
by
HitmanLV
To: nickcarraway
Insipid, self-absored, Lesbo-American twit bump for later.
35
posted on
08/13/2005 7:45:25 AM PDT
by
Euro-American Scum
(A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Social scientists suspect such emotions are part of women's nature, feelings that evolution may have favored because they helped women bond with one another and work cooperatively.
What? A NY Times reporter suggesting that women might be genetically different in their emotions from men?
In the crapola of leftwing liturgy, "bonding" and "cooperation" are considered high virtues. Therefore it is permissible and even desirable to explain why they distinguish womyn from those eeeevil men.
To: hinckley buzzard
Good analysis, IMO. But we don't dare suggest that men and women's intelligence might vary in any way!
37
posted on
08/13/2005 10:08:43 AM PDT
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(check out my posts on Today Show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
To: Past Your Eyes
Well, no. But I just wanted to point out a touching Bible story about a wonderful friendship among two women.
38
posted on
08/13/2005 10:10:14 AM PDT
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(check out my posts on Today Show bias at www.newsbusters.org)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
That you should even consider debasing the beautiful story of Ruth and Naomi with this tripe of a story from the NYT, makes me question your brain functions. Ruth was such a good example of devotion to her elderly mother-in-law that, though she had been a heathen Moabitess, she later married Boaz, thus becoming an ancestor of the Savior. Watch your mouth.
To: LibFreeOrDie
Another episode from the New York Times' continuing series of "Lifestyles of the Shallow and Stupid NY Liberal Female"... Not necessarily. I'm neither stupid nor liberal, and I had a few nonsexual "crushes" like that in my late teens and early twenties. A good friend's younger sister seems to have had one on me when she was in her early twenties. I just don't think they're important enough to warrant newspaper coverage. But it's an interesting phenomenon IMO - on reflection, I'd say that it's a last ditch "eek, I'm almost a grownup!" check for role models.
Now what it says that New York women are still looking for role models in their thirties is another matter altogether.
40
posted on
08/13/2005 10:18:01 AM PDT
by
Foxfire4
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson