Posted on 08/23/2005 4:49:02 AM PDT by Stajack
Thanks for the info.
Your welcome. These questions come up time to time here on FR and if you search the term "HTML" you will see some very helpful threads.
I love the fact Jim allows us to back track to these threads.
Using the services of a travel agent in Pakistan and traveling under aliases, on August 31, 1992, Ahmad Ajaj and Ramzi Yousef boarded Pakistan International Airlines Flight 703 in Peshawar and flew to Karachi, Pakistan, and then on to Kennedy Airport in New York City.10 They sat in first class during both legs of the trip, believing they would receive less scrutiny there. Between them, they carried a variety of documents to support their alias identities, including identification cards, bank records, education records, and medical records
Meanwhile, Yousef also was sent to secondary immigration inspection for lacking a passport or a visa that would allow him to enter the United States. He there presented an Iraqi passport he allegedly bought from a Pakistani official for $100.15 Upon questioning, Yousef said that the passport was fraudulent and that he bribed a Pakistani official in order to board the flight. Inspectors also found in his possession an Islamic Center identity card with Yousef’s photo and the name Khurram Khan, under which Ajaj had traveled into the United States. They also found a boarding pass in the name of Mohammed Azan.16 Although their documents were thus oddly intermingled and both men were in secondary inspection, Yousef was not linked to Ajaj. Rather, Yousef was arrested for not having a visa. He made a claim for political asylum and was released into the United States pending a hearing.
Search "keywords" for "sandbox." Here are a few links ...
http://www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a3aa5843c228c.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1285967/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/815719/posts
Thanks.
Also I am outraged that neither the 9/11 Omission report or any of these TV programs have said a word about the airline safety commission report in 1996 that was whitewashed by Al Gore to remove recommendations for hardening cockpits and strengthening airport security, because the airlines did not want to spend the money. Had the original recommendations of that commission been implemented, the 9/11 plot would have been found impossible to execute because the hijackers would not have been able to get into the cockpits. The week after that whitewashed report was issued, the airlines gave over $500,000 to the Democratic National Committee. The widow of the Pan Am 103 victim who was on the commission resigned in protest of the whitewash.
I also came away from the show thinking that it was a gross oversimplification of this plot and left many unanswered questions. How were every single one of these four teams of hijackers able to flawlessly execute their plans to take over those planes when they supposedly did not even know each other until the last minute? What did they do in Las Vegas? Why did the high school kid know the towers were coming down? I still believe those two that flew the planes into the WTC had to have help on the ground to guide them to those targets. These guys had never flown passenger jets before and were not familiar with the U.S. terrain. It just strains credulity to believe they were able to change the courses of those flights so dramatically and then reach the WTC in a straight line.
Also, I vividly remember listening to Don Imus on the radio the morning of September 13. A caller to his show said he owned several news stands in the area of the WTC and that all of the half-dozen or so Arab employees he had did not show up for work the morning of 9/11. I think there were a whole lotta people on the ground in New York City who knew this attack was coming and some of them helped.
That one paragraph should be shaking the halls of Congress... but all we get from them is
-- crickets --
"I'd love to see some reporterette ask Ol' Kennedy (on camera) what his view of it is. Or, better yet, Hildebeast..."
Yeah, that will happen. The MSM isn't interested in the truth unless it hurts Republicans.
You asked so I was trying to help. There is a link for HTML somewhere but I can't find it.
Someone will ping you to it but I can't find the link
I used to work with teletypes.....everything was caps and I never felt I was being shouted at...
Actually, for my old eyes, the caps work well.
You've got a point. Political correctness tends to gather momentum, IN-BETWEEN CRISES. Each crisis serves as a reality jolt, and PC declines for awhile...But inevitably it comes back, LIKE BACTERIA. In the sixty years between Pearl Harbor and 9/11, PC became firmly rooted in our security mindset. Even the folks at the frontlines of our security were affected. Case in point: The airline ticket agent in the special who didn't heed his instincts (which were screaming "terrorist") when he was face to face with one of the hijackers at ticket counter. If this were Israel, where the attacks occur more frequently, maybe we wouldn't be so prone to the PC phenomena. Who knows?
The National Geographic special was eye opening - Clinton had several opportunities to kill Osama and was too tied up with Monica to take advantage of the intelligence. Clinton is responcible for 9-11 in a very real way.
Who trusts th 9/11 commission. I am beginning to think that the kangaroo commission was set up purely to cover Clinton's tracks.
But since I try to debunk conspiracies I'll say instead that it was just a big chain of coincidences.
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?
Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES
REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK
|
While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding). The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style. Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect.... The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant. ... Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
Reverse Gorelick
|
I've been listening to Weldon and Shaffer every chance I get. Hope the others come forth. Something is very smelly.
Duly noted. I think a link to HTML coding was posted earlier. I'll check it out when I can.
It's all simple once you fool with it a bit. But at first it seems like Martian.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
