Skip to comments.
What National Geographic Actually Said About The Chart and Atta
National Geographic
Posted on 08/23/2005 4:49:02 AM PDT by Stajack
Here's EXACTLY what National Geographic said about The Chart, Atta, Special Operations and the FBI, as Transcribed from the special "Inside 9/11". Originally aired 8/21/05, re-aired 8/22/05.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abledanger; atta; inside911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-171 next last
AT THIS AIR FORCE BASE IN TAMPA (Picture of Entrance Gate to MacDill Air Force Base), MEMBERS OF THE U.S. ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ARE REVIEWING AN UNUSUAL CHART THAT REPORTEDLY IDENTIFIES BOTH ATTA (picture ID of Atta shown) AND AL-SHEHHI (picture ID of Al-Shehhi shown) AS LIKELY MEMBERS OF AN AL-QAEDA TERROR CELL OPERATING WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. THE OFFICIALS DECIDE THEY CANNOT PASS THIS INFORMATION ALONG TO THE FBI, IN PART BECAUSE THE MEN ARE HOLDING VALID U.S. VISAS AND MAY BE OFF LIMITS FROM INTELLIGENCE GATHERING BY THE MILITARY. The next segment discussed terrorist training camps in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
1
posted on
08/23/2005 4:49:04 AM PDT
by
Stajack
To: Stajack
And here it is for those who DON'T like to be shouted at, first thing in the morning:
"At this air force base in Tampa (picture of entrance gate to Macdill Air Force Base), members of the U.S. Army special operations command are reviewing an unusual chart that reportedly identifies both Atta (picture id of Atta shown) and Al-Shehhi (picture id of Al-Shehhi shown) as likely members of an Al-Qaeda terror cell operating within the united states. the officials decide they cannot pass this information along to the FBI, in part because the men are holding valid U.S. visas and may be off limits from intelligence gathering by the military."
Dan
2
posted on
08/23/2005 4:53:07 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Stajack
3
posted on
08/23/2005 4:53:32 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“Hi Lloyd. A little slow tonight, isn't it?”)
To: Stajack
I understand today, the Pentagon says they have not uncovered proof of Abel Dangers claims.
Maybe they should watch t.v. and see un-classified reports.
The classified reports must be a whopper.
4
posted on
08/23/2005 4:53:58 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: johnny7
I watched the National Georgraphic special Sunday and Monday nights. The poster has transcribed this section of the show correctly and, to my knowledge, it would be darned near impossible for him to post a link to a television show.
As we were on the live thread and watching this show, lots of freepers understood what was being discussed and typed, simultaneously, "Able Danger".
5
posted on
08/23/2005 4:55:55 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Stajack
THE OFFICIALS DECIDE THEY CANNOT PASS THIS INFORMATION ALONG TO THE FBI, IN PART BECAUSE THE MEN ARE HOLDING VALID U.S. VISAS AND MAY BE OFF LIMITS FROM INTELLIGENCE GATHERING BY THE MILITARYSetting aside the shoddy reporting and twisting the facts, that sentence in itself makes no sense.
6
posted on
08/23/2005 4:56:52 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: Stajack
Shout all you want. This is an excellent post!!!! The dems must be reaching for their Depends at this point.
7
posted on
08/23/2005 4:58:53 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: Stajack
Is the report typed with proportional spacing? Does it look like it was done in Word?
8
posted on
08/23/2005 4:59:05 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(A living affront to Islam since 1959)
To: Stajack
Yeah, we've been hearing that same thing for 2 weeks. And...?
9
posted on
08/23/2005 5:02:16 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: BibChr; Stajack; All
10
posted on
08/23/2005 5:03:04 AM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
To: SlowBoat407
11
posted on
08/23/2005 5:06:14 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: hershey
I'm with you......SHOUTING and more shouting is called for.
Keep this bumbed to the top.....ALL DAY
12
posted on
08/23/2005 5:08:07 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
To: BibChr
Dan, I get your point...BUT, the caps were intended to distinguish the actual transcript from my own editorial comments. Since there's been so much discussion about what National Geographic actually said, it was important to me to be ACCURATE. If your sensibilities are offended, don't take it personal. Have a great day.
13
posted on
08/23/2005 5:09:22 AM PDT
by
Stajack
To: mtbopfuyn
It would be helpful if you identified the shoddy part and the part that doesn't make sense.
If it is untrue or unsupported, it is shoddy, but it makes sense to me. Transcripts often read poorly because spoken dialog is not grammatically clean.
14
posted on
08/23/2005 5:10:38 AM PDT
by
js1138
(Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
To: mtbopfuyn
"Setting aside the shoddy reporting and twisting the facts, that sentence in itself makes no sense."
Huh?
Having twice watched that part of the program, I find the quoted sentence both to be well-constructed and to make perfect sense when considered in context. The National Geographic special was excellent, in my opinion.
15
posted on
08/23/2005 5:10:53 AM PDT
by
Jedidah
To: Stajack
I certainly don't take it personally. I think it's just a law of human nature, as I've observed -- folks don't want to read all caps. It's considered shouting.
Your fundamental idea was a good one. In the future, to make sure you're better-heard, I'd suggest using bold for one, plain for the other; or italics; or you could even use red font.
One man's opinion, your milage may vary.
Dan
16
posted on
08/23/2005 5:11:29 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: OldFriend
To: edcoil
The record quotes Rep Weldon on the floor of the House saying "here is the unclassified chart" as he spoke. The 9/11 Omission should ask (respectfully!) for that chart at least. Perhaps Weldon has even more.
18
posted on
08/23/2005 5:13:03 AM PDT
by
NetValue
(No enemy has inflicted as much damage on America as liberals.)
To: OldFriend
Notice the dems' thundering silence. Not a peep. The only one talking is Clinton, covering his behind.
19
posted on
08/23/2005 5:13:14 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: OldFriend
BUMP!!!!
Clintons = Hear no Atta, See no Atta, Speak no Atta!!!!
To: mtbopfuyn
Whether it makes sense or not, it is what was said. So what is your point?
21
posted on
08/23/2005 5:16:43 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: Stajack
Excellent. The show was pretty good for National Geographic.
22
posted on
08/23/2005 5:18:01 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: Stajack
Thank you for taking time to post the exact wording. This doesn't leave much doubt.
To: hershey
It really is a privledge watching perfect gentlemen sorting fly specks out of ground pepper and entirely unmindful of the content as well as the meaning of the subject under scrutiny.
24
posted on
08/23/2005 5:20:17 AM PDT
by
CBart95
To: BibChr
Dan,
I'm relatively new to this. Is there an option for italics, bolding, etc. If so, where?
25
posted on
08/23/2005 5:20:59 AM PDT
by
Stajack
To: Conspiracy Guy
Maybe this is the info that Sandy The Burglar was sneaking out in his pants
26
posted on
08/23/2005 5:21:47 AM PDT
by
MudSlide
To: Stajack
27
posted on
08/23/2005 5:22:56 AM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Congressmen who willfully...during war...damage moral...should be arrested, exiled or..." Lincoln)
To: CBart95
To: Peach
Do you know when it will be repeated?
29
posted on
08/23/2005 5:23:33 AM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Congressmen who willfully...during war...damage moral...should be arrested, exiled or..." Lincoln)
To: Stajack
Use HTML Italics on = < i> Off is </ i> use b in place of i for bold. Remove the space following < to make it work
30
posted on
08/23/2005 5:23:55 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: MudSlide
Yes. I'd bet money on it.
31
posted on
08/23/2005 5:24:44 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: Stajack
32
posted on
08/23/2005 5:25:38 AM PDT
by
TheForceOfOne
(The alternative media is our Enigma machine.)
To: Stajack
Italics and BOLD See!
33
posted on
08/23/2005 5:25:55 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: Just mythoughts
And notice the media is not demanding answers from Berger or any of the NSA creatures in the X42 administration.
34
posted on
08/23/2005 5:28:13 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
To: Stajack
RED Substitute font color=Red for the i. Turn off with /font don't forget the
35
posted on
08/23/2005 5:29:00 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: Stajack
36
posted on
08/23/2005 5:29:24 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: Conspiracy Guy
37
posted on
08/23/2005 5:30:11 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
To: Conspiracy Guy
Thanks, who knew
38
posted on
08/23/2005 5:31:35 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
To: nw_arizona_granny
39
posted on
08/23/2005 5:31:47 AM PDT
by
DAVEY CROCKETT
(Character exalts Liberty and Freedom, Righteous exalts a Nation.)
To: mtbopfuyn
Thats what they said, heard it with my own ears last night as I watched part 1 for the second time. I work up this morning with a headache and it is from reliving this nightmare. No one at my job watched this I believe I was the only one. You see liberals did not watch this nor do they care. If it were a Hollywood version they would have all been discussing this by the coffee pot this morning.
40
posted on
08/23/2005 5:32:32 AM PDT
by
angcat
To: Stajack
41
posted on
08/23/2005 5:33:52 AM PDT
by
auboy
To: Chgogal
I don't know when it will be repeated, but it will. Maybe check their website?
42
posted on
08/23/2005 5:35:07 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Stajack
After watching(and taping) inside 9-11 I have come to the conclusion that our government basically gave the terrorists the keys to the cockpit. It didn't matter which administration was in power. Even the guy at the counter who gave Atta and company their tickets didn't have a good feeling about him-but in the name of PC he didn't act on it. If 9-11 didn't teach us anything it should have taught us that being PC will kill us.
To: edcoil
Pardon my language but the Pentagon is full of wombat guano. If they can't find records, I inclined to believe it's because someone has had a shreading party! Has anyone checked Sandy Burgler's pants?
44
posted on
08/23/2005 5:37:52 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Cindy Sheehan: "All You Are Saying Is Give APPEASEMENT A Chance!")
To: angcat
Thats what they said, heard it with my own ears last night as I watched part 1 for the second time. I work up this morning with a headache and it is from reliving this nightmare.I awoke the same way - I dreamt all night about sinister looking "swarthy" men and burning buildings.
45
posted on
08/23/2005 5:38:55 AM PDT
by
WIladyconservative
(Set up a monthly donation to FR - why? because it's The Right Thing to Do!)
To: Conspiracy Guy
I'm glad you know how to bold and italicize. But was that for my benefit, or YOURS?
46
posted on
08/23/2005 5:39:27 AM PDT
by
Stajack
To: Stajack; All
47
posted on
08/23/2005 5:41:24 AM PDT
by
quantim
(I'm at the point now where I refer to all liberals as "insurgents.")
To: hershey
Notice the dems' thundering silence. Not a peep. The only one talking is Clinton, covering his behind. I'd love to see some reporterette ask Ol' Kennedy (on camera) what his view of it is. Or, better yet, Hildebeast...
48
posted on
08/23/2005 5:41:45 AM PDT
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: mtbopfuyn
It makes perfect sense.
And it would be "shoddy reporting" only if the statement inaccurately or incompletely summarizes what was said by "the officials." Do you have superior knowledge of what "the officials" said?
49
posted on
08/23/2005 5:43:16 AM PDT
by
JCEccles
To: Just mythoughts
50
posted on
08/23/2005 5:44:15 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(Its only funny till someone gets hurt, Then its HILARIOUS.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson