Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“AT THIS AIR FORCE BASE IN TAMPA (Picture of Entrance Gate to MacDill Air Force Base), MEMBERS OF THE U.S. ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND ARE REVIEWING AN UNUSUAL CHART THAT REPORTEDLY IDENTIFIES BOTH ATTA (picture ID of Atta shown) AND AL-SHEHHI (picture ID of Al-Shehhi shown) AS LIKELY MEMBERS OF AN AL-QAEDA TERROR CELL OPERATING WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. THE OFFICIALS DECIDE THEY CANNOT PASS THIS INFORMATION ALONG TO THE FBI, IN PART BECAUSE THE MEN ARE HOLDING VALID U.S. VISAS AND MAY BE OFF LIMITS FROM INTELLIGENCE GATHERING BY THE MILITARY”. The next segment discussed terrorist training camps in Kandahar, Afghanistan.
1 posted on 08/23/2005 4:49:04 AM PDT by Stajack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Stajack

And here it is for those who DON'T like to be shouted at, first thing in the morning:

"At this air force base in Tampa (picture of entrance gate to Macdill Air Force Base), members of the U.S. Army special operations command are reviewing an unusual chart that reportedly identifies both Atta (picture id of Atta shown) and Al-Shehhi (picture id of Al-Shehhi shown) as likely members of an Al-Qaeda terror cell operating within the united states. the officials decide they cannot pass this information along to the FBI, in part because the men are holding valid U.S. visas and may be off limits from intelligence gathering by the military”."

Dan


2 posted on 08/23/2005 4:53:07 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

Got link?


3 posted on 08/23/2005 4:53:32 AM PDT by johnny7 (“Hi Lloyd. A little slow tonight, isn't it?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

I understand today, the Pentagon says they have not uncovered proof of Abel Dangers claims.

Maybe they should watch t.v. and see un-classified reports.

The classified reports must be a whopper.


4 posted on 08/23/2005 4:53:58 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack
THE OFFICIALS DECIDE THEY CANNOT PASS THIS INFORMATION ALONG TO THE FBI, IN PART BECAUSE THE MEN ARE HOLDING VALID U.S. VISAS AND MAY BE OFF LIMITS FROM INTELLIGENCE GATHERING BY THE MILITARY

Setting aside the shoddy reporting and twisting the facts, that sentence in itself makes no sense.

6 posted on 08/23/2005 4:56:52 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

Shout all you want. This is an excellent post!!!! The dems must be reaching for their Depends at this point.


7 posted on 08/23/2005 4:58:53 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

Is the report typed with proportional spacing? Does it look like it was done in Word?


8 posted on 08/23/2005 4:59:05 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (A living affront to Islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

Yeah, we've been hearing that same thing for 2 weeks. And...?


9 posted on 08/23/2005 5:02:16 AM PDT by theDentist (The Dems have put all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

Excellent. The show was pretty good for National Geographic.


22 posted on 08/23/2005 5:18:01 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Warning.... Contents under pressure....If you don't like what I say, don't read it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

Thank you for taking time to post the exact wording. This doesn't leave much doubt.


23 posted on 08/23/2005 5:19:38 AM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

BTTT


27 posted on 08/23/2005 5:22:56 AM PDT by Chgogal (Congressmen who willfully...during war...damage moral...should be arrested, exiled or..." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

Bump


41 posted on 08/23/2005 5:33:52 AM PDT by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

After watching(and taping) inside 9-11 I have come to the conclusion that our government basically gave the terrorists the keys to the cockpit. It didn't matter which administration was in power. Even the guy at the counter who gave Atta and company their tickets didn't have a good feeling about him-but in the name of PC he didn't act on it. If 9-11 didn't teach us anything it should have taught us that being PC will kill us.


43 posted on 08/23/2005 5:37:02 AM PDT by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack; All
You can buy the DVD here:

http://shop.nationalgeographic.com/shopping/product/detailmain.jsp?itemID=2690&itemType=PRODUCT&iMainCat=128&iSubCat=240&iProductID=2690

 

47 posted on 08/23/2005 5:41:24 AM PDT by quantim (I'm at the point now where I refer to all liberals as "insurgents.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

The National Geographic special was eye opening - Clinton had several opportunities to kill Osama and was too tied up with Monica to take advantage of the intelligence. Clinton is responcible for 9-11 in a very real way.


75 posted on 08/23/2005 6:36:39 AM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack
bump

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?



Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES
REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:

  • Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
  • Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect....

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

... Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

Reverse Gorelick
by Mia T, 4.15.04
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(
MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP)

 


77 posted on 08/23/2005 6:38:00 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack; Just mythoughts; unsycophant; LoudRepublicangirl; newzjunkey; Delta 21; edcoil; ...
The National Geographic report AND the 911 Report left out this crucial piece of fact:

In Clinton's final report to the nation on national security titled "A NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY FOR A GLOBAL AGE THE -- WHITE HOUSE DECEMBER 2000", (45,000 words strong), al-Qaeda was not mentioned one time, yet we are being told Clinton took al-Qaeda seriously!

The very first sentence of that report in the preface stated the following:

"As we enter the new millennium, we are blessed to be citizens of a country enjoying record prosperity, with no deep divisions at home, no overriding external threats abroad, and history's most powerful military ready to defend our interests around the world."

This Clinton Report on National security was delvered TWO MONTHS AFTER the al-Qaeda attack on the USS Cole, yet not one word mentioned al-Qaeda. Not one word after not only the USS COLE, but after the 1993 WTC bombing and numerous other al-Qaeda attacks ranging from Mogadishu through the Embassy bombings and bin-Laden's declaration of war against the USA.

Not one word out of 45,000 +!

This National Geographic Report was a whitewash, considering they left out this FACT. This report is official US Government data, a report fully available to any citizen who wants to read it.

Why the 911 Commission Report left this out, and why the National Geographic Report left this out is staggering--the only explanation is that it makes Clinton look 100% culpable and both reports ran cover for Scumbag.


97 posted on 08/23/2005 7:23:32 AM PDT by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack

BTTT!


117 posted on 08/23/2005 9:37:00 AM PDT by BayouCoyote (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack
Sequence of events:

Jan-Feb 2000: Able Danger identifies Atta and friends as Al-Qaeda operatives.

Late spring 2000: Able Danger wants to communicate with FBI

Special Ops suggests plan to take down 5 Al-Qaeda cells.

Clinton Administration defunds Able Danger, ending operations and beginning phase-out..

3 months later, George Bush sworn into office.

Clinton fails to discuss Al-Qaeda or bin-Laden in transition briefing

Albright fails to discuss Al-Qaeda or bin-Laden in transition briefing with Powell.

Sandy Burglar fails to discuss Al-Qaeda or bin-Laden in transition briefing with Condi Rice.

Days later, without funds to operate, Able Danger locks its doors.

.........and 7 months later........9/11

126 posted on 08/23/2005 10:20:54 AM PDT by cookcounty (Army Vet, Army Dad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

later read


135 posted on 08/23/2005 12:10:05 PM PDT by Mo1 (Hey Cindy ... tell us again why Our Country is not worth fighting for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stajack
Thank you for transcribing this quote. I watched the tapes this afternoon.

The scene the next morning when the rescue workers were trying to find survivors was exceptionally chilling. The chirping from the firemen's electronic homing devices was frightening and haunting. I did not know that firefighters wore them. It is so sad that the devices survived, yet the firemen didn't.

Another thing that surprised me was that National Geographic actually said that terrorists mailed the Anthrax. Of course, we know they did. But I don't recall anyone in authority actually admitting that. We're supposed to forget about that. Remember, no terrorist attacts have occurred on U.S. soil since 9/11. Right......

Every American should watch this show and remember what it is we are up against.
140 posted on 08/23/2005 2:13:57 PM PDT by Samwise ("You have the nerve to say that terrorism is caused by resisting it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson