And here it is for those who DON'T like to be shouted at, first thing in the morning:
"At this air force base in Tampa (picture of entrance gate to Macdill Air Force Base), members of the U.S. Army special operations command are reviewing an unusual chart that reportedly identifies both Atta (picture id of Atta shown) and Al-Shehhi (picture id of Al-Shehhi shown) as likely members of an Al-Qaeda terror cell operating within the united states. the officials decide they cannot pass this information along to the FBI, in part because the men are holding valid U.S. visas and may be off limits from intelligence gathering by the military."
Dan
Got link?
I understand today, the Pentagon says they have not uncovered proof of Abel Dangers claims.
Maybe they should watch t.v. and see un-classified reports.
The classified reports must be a whopper.
Setting aside the shoddy reporting and twisting the facts, that sentence in itself makes no sense.
Shout all you want. This is an excellent post!!!! The dems must be reaching for their Depends at this point.
Is the report typed with proportional spacing? Does it look like it was done in Word?
Yeah, we've been hearing that same thing for 2 weeks. And...?
Excellent. The show was pretty good for National Geographic.
Thank you for taking time to post the exact wording. This doesn't leave much doubt.
BTTT
Bump
After watching(and taping) inside 9-11 I have come to the conclusion that our government basically gave the terrorists the keys to the cockpit. It didn't matter which administration was in power. Even the guy at the counter who gave Atta and company their tickets didn't have a good feeling about him-but in the name of PC he didn't act on it. If 9-11 didn't teach us anything it should have taught us that being PC will kill us.
The National Geographic special was eye opening - Clinton had several opportunities to kill Osama and was too tied up with Monica to take advantage of the intelligence. Clinton is responcible for 9-11 in a very real way.
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?
Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES
REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK
While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding). The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style. Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:
Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect.... The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant. ... Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.
Reverse Gorelick
|
In Clinton's final report to the nation on national security titled "A NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY FOR A GLOBAL AGE THE -- WHITE HOUSE DECEMBER 2000", (45,000 words strong), al-Qaeda was not mentioned one time, yet we are being told Clinton took al-Qaeda seriously!
The very first sentence of that report in the preface stated the following:
"As we enter the new millennium, we are blessed to be citizens of a country enjoying record prosperity, with no deep divisions at home, no overriding external threats abroad, and history's most powerful military ready to defend our interests around the world."
This Clinton Report on National security was delvered TWO MONTHS AFTER the al-Qaeda attack on the USS Cole, yet not one word mentioned al-Qaeda. Not one word after not only the USS COLE, but after the 1993 WTC bombing and numerous other al-Qaeda attacks ranging from Mogadishu through the Embassy bombings and bin-Laden's declaration of war against the USA.
Not one word out of 45,000 +!
This National Geographic Report was a whitewash, considering they left out this FACT. This report is official US Government data, a report fully available to any citizen who wants to read it.
Why the 911 Commission Report left this out, and why the National Geographic Report left this out is staggering--the only explanation is that it makes Clinton look 100% culpable and both reports ran cover for Scumbag.
BTTT!
Jan-Feb 2000: Able Danger identifies Atta and friends as Al-Qaeda operatives.
Late spring 2000: Able Danger wants to communicate with FBI
Special Ops suggests plan to take down 5 Al-Qaeda cells.
Clinton Administration defunds Able Danger, ending operations and beginning phase-out..
3 months later, George Bush sworn into office.
Clinton fails to discuss Al-Qaeda or bin-Laden in transition briefing
Albright fails to discuss Al-Qaeda or bin-Laden in transition briefing with Powell.
Sandy Burglar fails to discuss Al-Qaeda or bin-Laden in transition briefing with Condi Rice.
Days later, without funds to operate, Able Danger locks its doors.
.........and 7 months later........9/11
later read