Dyslexia? Naw....
Posted on 09/07/2005 10:40:01 PM PDT by anymouse
Dyslexia, the learning disability thought to affect one in 10 Britons, does not exist and is no more than an emotional construct, education experts will claim in a television documentary to be aired next week. In the programme, which looks at the causes and treatment of poor reading, at least three academics call into question the value of separating those with difficulty in reading into dyslexics and "ordinary poor readers", when the treatment is the same for both groups.
Experts say many children are being diagnosed with the condition to save embarrassment over their reading skills and in order to get extra help at school.
But the suggestion has angered many dyslexic people and dyslexia organisations, who say the argument is damaging and unhelpful.
The widening gulf between academics and those who teach dyslexic people has resulted in a call for the term to be consigned to medical history books and a rethink on the treatment of all people who have difficulties reading.
The Channel 4 documentary will present the argument that dyslexia is a myth. The programme's producer, David Mills, said yesterday that the assertion that people with poor reading skills but high IQs should be diagnosed differently from other poor readers was wrong.
"You cannot separate a group of poor readers and say they are dyslexic, but if we clump all poor readers together you are then labelling 20% of kids with a disability."
One of the programme's contributors has written about the condition in this week's Times Educational Supplement. Julian Elliott, professor of education at the University of Durham, said that despite 30 years in the field he has little confidence in his ability to diagnose the condition.
"Dyslexia persists as a construct largely because it serves an emotional, not scientific, function. Forget about letter reversals, clumsiness, inconsistent hand preference and poor memory - these are commonly found in people without reading difficulties, and in poor readers not considered to be dyslexic ...
"Public perceptions often link reading difficulties with intelligence and, in our culture, an attribution of low intelligence often results in feelings of shame and humiliation.
"It is hardly surprising, therefore, that the widespread, yet wholly erroneous, belief that dyslexics are intellectually bright but poor readers would create a strong, sometimes impassioned demand to be accorded a dyslexic label.
"Yes of course, some children will require special resources and dispensations, but we certainly don't need spurious diagnoses of dyslexia to achieve such ends."
It is thought that about 375,000 schoolchildren suffer from dyslexia, which requires skilled specialist teaching.
Those with a diagnosis are often provided with teaching aids and are given extra time in exams, leading to claims that parents want a diagnosis to get an unfair advantage.
About 4% of the population are thought to suffer from a severe form of dyslexia.
A spokeswoman from the British Dyslexia Association said it had been inundated with calls from people worried about their own condition.
"This is very damaging and insulting to the people who are trying to overcome their dyslexia - a condition which is widely known to be a neurological disorder," she said.
John Rack, head of research at the Dyslexia Institute in York, said the scientific basis for dyslexia was well established.
"We know which of the chromosomes are involved and some of the genes that are involved, as well as some of the brain differences you observe when looking at a dyslexic child," Dr Rack said."
But Michael Rice, a dyslexia and literacy expert from the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge University, said the term dyslexia could soon be a thing of the past. "People feel a sense of justification when they are diagnosed, and it becomes almost defining of who they are. It gets them off the hook of great embarrassment and feelings of personal inadequacy," Dr Rice said.
Well-known people who are dyslexic include Sir Richard Branson, Jamie Oliver and the swimmer Duncan Goodhew, who said: "I don't think it is very helpful to argue about terms when we should be looking at the solutions. It is a neurological problem, a neurological deficit which ruins many people's lives."
I issue think some Freepers take will with article this.
I ping will my mesozoic fiends.
Dammit, I want to be a victim!
!tnemetats suolucidir a tahW
I dno't konw waht yuo're tlaknig aobut. Ervyetinhg mdae pefrcet sesne to me.
The BBC never makes sense. Split it up into 5 or 6 parts and let those who pay the 'TV tax' decide which channel[s] to send their portion to.
You think YOU got problems?
Obviously these jerks have never dealt with it 1st hand.
I used to sell auto parts and when we changed over to computer inventory control I was screwing up hourly with the new part #'s, sometimes I would just get 1 or 2 digits swapped and other times I would flip the whole # backwards. It didn't help that we also went from Alphanumeric to numeric at the same time.
I do the exact same thing; it has gotten slightly worse in the last few years. I also transpose letters when typing, sometimes whole words, and now occasionally I transpose words when actually speaking.
But the idea that I would have ever needed special ANYTHING is stoopid. Or stoodip.
:-)
I think it's brain damage from all the drugs I took long, long ago.
Dyslexia? Naw....
I always thought you were a bit wardsback, Rebloggblur.
As an English and a reading instructor, I dealt with adults with poor reading skills and those with dyslexia. You can tell the difference.
It's a real problem for some people. You have to use coping strategies (and there are a number of them, like using blue paper, which seems to help).
A poor reader can improve his reading without those strategies, by working on rate, vocabulary and analytical reading skills. It's not that hard to teach.
This won't improve the real problems a dyslexic is having decoding words. It's not the same problem. I know dyslexics who have Ph.Ds - they still struggle with texts. They've learned ways to cope.
OLL! This theard is crakcing me up!
1 in 10 Britons????? How the hell do these people even exist?????? Sounds like the entire cast from "Airplane"!
That said, there are of course abuses. My sister used to work in the modern language department of a large university. The number of students who didn't like foreign languages who came to the office asking for an exemption from the language requirement because they were dyslexic (self-diagnosed!) was staggering.
Ann Coulter has pretty much been saying the same thing for years (i.e., dismissing dyslexia as a convenient cover for "rich parents of dumb kids").
Dyslexia is not something we should make pun of.
I'm a dyslexic but I don't shiv a git.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.