Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Weak terror response led to 9/11 (Bush hits back at Clinton)
UPI ^ | 9/22/05

Posted on 09/22/2005 12:50:55 PM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon

Bush: Weak terror response led to 9/11

Sep 22, 2005, 19:00 GMT

WASHINGTON, DC, United States (UPI) -- President Bush said withdrawing from Iraq would be a mistake that would embolden terrorists just as U.S. responses to other attacks led to 9/11 hijackings.

Speaking Thursday at the Pentagon after an update on the war on terror, Bush said a pullback would be seen as weakness and make the United States less safe.

'The terrorists saw our response to the hostage crisis in Iran, the bombings in the Marine barracks in Lebanon, the first World Trade Center attack, the killing of American soldiers in Somalia, the destruction of two U.S. embassies in Africa and the attack on the USS Cole,' Bush said. 'The terrorists concluded that we lacked the courage and character to defend ourselves and so they attacked us.'

It was the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, carried out by al-Qaida operatives, that led Bush to launch the war on terror with an attack on Afghanistan, where al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden had been given sanctuary. Bush links the fighting in Iraq with the war on terror.

The president said the plan is to follow a strategy of making political gains in the affected counties, while training local personnel to assume security operations.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 226; bubbaterrorist; bush43; clintonlegacy; clintoon; cutandrun; fellatiousfirstfelon; gladivotedbush; redherring; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-406 next last
To: Pride in the USA

Exactly what he needed to say two years ago, and keep saying at every opportunity.


361 posted on 09/23/2005 10:31:40 AM PDT by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Oh, O.K.


362 posted on 09/23/2005 10:48:32 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"Could have been a tad stronger -- tell ole BJ to get off the stage and stay in retirement"

ROTFLMAO!


363 posted on 09/23/2005 1:25:02 PM PDT by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
This is the only place I heard or read of it!
Clinton's criticism sure got a lot of press!
364 posted on 09/23/2005 1:29:55 PM PDT by cjmae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

"tell ole BJ to get off the stage and stay in retirement". Didn't you know the Hillary for President Committee has already hired him to start early, building a case for herself, who better than Slick Willie.

She has no intentions of completing her term in senate. Too Bad we don't have anyone strong enough to bump her off her seat. All the Dems are self destructing, if you notice BJ isn't backing any of them and neither is Hillary. I sure in the heck hope that MCCain stays out of the race.


365 posted on 09/23/2005 1:36:11 PM PDT by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter

Klin-ton never made a move withut consulting a focus group or a poll. Just the kind of leader DIMOS love, but puts our country at extreme risk. This arrogant SOB has the audacity to come out and criticize Bush. God help us all if Hitlery gets in.


366 posted on 09/23/2005 1:38:33 PM PDT by Jazzman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ozzysmom

Maybe Honoree gave him a few pointer. He needs to start speaking up at every turn. Either you with me or your with the terrorist . He is the president and should take control of the long leach we have given the DEMs.


367 posted on 09/23/2005 1:39:19 PM PDT by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush
he said "I've heard it said that you should not try to debate a fool, a casual observer might not know the difference."

Personally, I give most observers more credit than that. I think they could tell that when someone's accused of expecting the President to "solve" any problems, when in fact he said absolutely no such thing, it would be clear to most observers that it's the accuser who's being the fool.

368 posted on 09/23/2005 3:05:04 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage
I fear Rita victims will demand per capita match of Katrina aid $'s.Especially those whose interests are "protected" by the self-appointed: Jesse Hijackson, Al Sharptongue, and Calypso Louie.
369 posted on 09/23/2005 3:23:18 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
Screw the New Tone!

The "new tone" was rejected by the Demonrats in the POTUS's first month in office. Yet W has tried valiantly to cling to it.

370 posted on 09/23/2005 3:25:47 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Get out your ear plugs, the Clintonistas will be shrieking like scalded dogs.

I can hear them now: "We greatly deplore that the president has chosen to take the low road in responding to the valid concerns of American citizens in an out of government." Doesn't that sound like a typical Demonrat?

371 posted on 09/23/2005 3:30:00 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
President Bush is this great leader.

Perhaps he is. But when are more people going to notice it?

372 posted on 09/23/2005 3:31:36 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pj_627
If you recall, the mystery bump led Democraps to assert that W was wired for sound and was receiving debate answers from Karl Rove.
373 posted on 09/23/2005 3:35:34 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: inquest
You're saying Bush wasn't privy to the intel that Clinton had?

Apparently not if the Pentagon destroyed intel (Able Danger) equivalent to 25% of the volume of the Library of Congress before GWB assumed office.

374 posted on 09/23/2005 3:43:12 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
It's not as though the current Pentagon has been entirely innocent of stonewalling on that.

But regardless, what implications would that have had on the administration's ability to hit back at those responsible for the Cole bombing? That Able Danger thing was about identifying and tracking individual terrorists, not about finding out which organizations and state sponsors were responsible for what attacks.

375 posted on 09/23/2005 4:17:00 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: hophead

It wasn't a backbone he needed, he needed to stop trying to be so F'ing nice the people that what to bring him down and lie about him.

It is about time he started giving it back to them.


376 posted on 09/23/2005 5:09:53 PM PDT by stockpirate (John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
Boot to the Head, Willie! Clinton Lied, 3,000 died. Image hosted by Photobucket.com
377 posted on 09/23/2005 5:43:12 PM PDT by TheRobb7 (The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
George W. Bush... Saving your ass whether you like it or not!<<<

WOW!...What a bumper sticker!!!!...I luv it!...can any freepers here make that in a printable version?...I'm puter illiterate
378 posted on 09/23/2005 6:35:18 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: quantfive
Remember the recession in 1991 and the election? We got Clinton.<<<

We got Clinton because of Perot!..pure and simple divide and conquer
379 posted on 09/23/2005 6:48:47 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: inquest
We just don't know everything that Able Danger dealt with. In view of the volume of material gathered and reported subsequently destroyed, there may have been linkages to the Cole attack. Who knows what was destroyed?
380 posted on 09/23/2005 7:04:21 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-406 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson