Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush 10/3 Thread (Cheney Will Be On the Rush Limbaugh Show)
Rush Limbaugh show | 10/3/05 | El Rushbo

Posted on 10/03/2005 8:53:59 AM PDT by Rosemont

Maha Rushie


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 441-447 next last
To: Rosemont

From drudge,

"
VP Cheney Plans To Detail Support Of Harriet Miers On Rush Limbaugh Radio 1 PM ET/10 AM PT..."


61 posted on 10/03/2005 9:23:34 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

WOW! Just heard El Rushbo say he is VERY disappointed that W picked Miers because it makes him look weak! I bet you deep inside Rush is hopping mad! WOW! I thought Rush was going to KUDO W on Miers...now I'm sort of nervous after all the praise I gave W on Miers! WHO do I trust more at this point? Hard to pick, but if I had to pick now it would be RUSH! ACLJ has endorsed Miers though...ugh, this is confusing!


62 posted on 10/03/2005 9:23:45 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LS

Bush NEEDS a fight right now. The reason his poll ratings are down is because conservatives are disenchanted with his spending, his failure to control the borders, and his pandering to the race hustlers after Katrina. Bush needs a clear right vs. left fight...a vicious, bloody fight....to rally the base for 2006.

Some people just don't get it. It's the Democrats who are desperate to avoid a Supreme Court fight. The reason they threatened Bush so much on this issue was to intimidate him into not sending up a nominee who would trigger a fight. The 'Rats knew that a fight would result in the public rallying around the nominee, who would then be confirmed, with Bush's ratings going up and the GOP base rallied for 2006. The last thing the 'Rats wanted was a situation where Ralph Neas & NARAL & Co. were demanding that they filibuster while phone calls & e-mails from back home were running four-to-one in favor of the nominee. Imagine Mary Landrieu or Max Baucus or Bill Nelson caught in that trap.

Bush avoided a fight and gave us a stealth nominee who is a decade too old, thus providing the Democrats with political cover.


63 posted on 10/03/2005 9:24:04 AM PDT by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: grassboots.org
Will you eat your mouse if you are wrong?

Here's the after dinner photo.


64 posted on 10/03/2005 9:24:29 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Osama Bin Laden Al Khanzier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

My own response is the same as your's and Rush's....after all this time of waiting and now we have not one but two stealth candidates?

why?


Patrician DNA

but like Rush....I don't know anything about her


65 posted on 10/03/2005 9:24:35 AM PDT by wardaddy (stealth schmealth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

It is a proven fact that it is better to energize your base than try to appeal to people who are not going to vote for you anyway.


66 posted on 10/03/2005 9:24:56 AM PDT by TSchmereL (I am sick of Bush and his big spending, half-hearted conservativism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
ACLJ has endorsed Miers though...ugh, this is confusing!

Who are they?

67 posted on 10/03/2005 9:25:17 AM PDT by b4its2late (Hard work never killed anyone, but why chance it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Why are you on this thread if you don't like Rush? What's your motive?


68 posted on 10/03/2005 9:25:33 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont
Anxiously waiting to get Rush's take on GWB's pick."""

That's right. We can't think for ourselves. Let's wait until Rush gives us the talking points -- the reasons why we're supposed to applaud the nomination of a woman who donated to Al Gore. I can't wait till Rush comes on and tells me what to think and say.

69 posted on 10/03/2005 9:25:41 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff; YaYa123; Bahbah; malia

Pinging before reading!!


70 posted on 10/03/2005 9:25:50 AM PDT by Springman (Job hunting sucks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Sure he's allowed. He's allowed to lose listeners because of it.


71 posted on 10/03/2005 9:26:17 AM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

You are a fool.

If you refuse to even listen to the show, and it's obvious you have NOT, get off the thread.


72 posted on 10/03/2005 9:26:35 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (Barbour/Honore in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
I thin it will be hard to compare this woman to Roberts who stood before the supreme court so many times. Rush's theme today seems to be Bush picked her from a standpoint of weakness.

What gets me is GW is not running for anything! Why not go for the gold. Get us a true well know conservative and then push it through with the nuc option if necessary. Any one who does not go along kick their butts when they need money.
73 posted on 10/03/2005 9:26:57 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU and all Mosques in the US,UK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
Bush NEEDS a fight right now.

Amen to that. Not that poll numbers are the be-all and end-all, but recall that Clinton's poll numbers jumped when he was fighting the "Right Wing Conspiracy" and impeachment.

74 posted on 10/03/2005 9:27:21 AM PDT by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter

>> Rush has been turned off my radio once again.
When he's positive, he's good.
When he started off by saving that it's hard not to be "pulled" to the criticism of this nominee.....that was all I needed to hear.
I actually had a little hope that Rush wasn't so influenced by others, but I was wrong. <<

Jus' keep drinking that good ol' Bush Kool-Aid, brother. Nothing Bush does is wrong. A man who can't express a simple thought or use a complex sentence without stepping on his pecker is actually the prefectest, bestest President of all time!


75 posted on 10/03/2005 9:27:22 AM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Rush needs to get behind President Bush on this. United we stand, divided we fall. The RATS and MSM already are claiming the GOP is in disarray over Rove, Delay, Katrina, etc. The best way to prove them wrong is to stand with our President over his nominee.


76 posted on 10/03/2005 9:27:23 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
The best way to get his poll numbers up would have been to engergize his base and stir things up a bit.

I agree with you. Evidently the WH thinks it is to appease the media and the Dems. Oh well.

On the other hand, Fred Barnes has a pretty good piece suggesting that we need to wait and see from the hearings before we pass judgement.

Frankly, I'm not too thrilled with the "cronyism" either.

77 posted on 10/03/2005 9:27:31 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

my questions to Cheney:


1- why give a lifetime appointment to a 60 year-old?

2- is she truly our best and brightest?

3- what message does this send to the many brilliant appellate court judges that were passed over?

4- why didn't you save this "throw away" appointment for when John Paul Stevens retires?


78 posted on 10/03/2005 9:27:37 AM PDT by Uncle Joe Cannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

ACLJ

American Center for Law and Justice.

http://www.aclj.org/AboutJay/Default.aspx


79 posted on 10/03/2005 9:28:14 AM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

They should make a show about Dick Cheney being president.

In 2008, of course. ^^


80 posted on 10/03/2005 9:28:17 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 441-447 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson