Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newdow Wants To Change Entire Pledge Of Allegiance
KCRA ^ | 10/05/05 | KCRA

Posted on 10/05/2005 4:54:09 PM PDT by Pikamax

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- A man who is fighting to get the words "under God" out of the Pledge of Allegiance was back in federal court Wednesday, making some surprising comments about the case.

Although the hearing was a procedural matter with no key rulings, Michael Newdow said that if he is successful in having the words removed from the pledge at the U.S. Supreme Court level, it still wouldn't be enough.

Newdow believes that it is time to get rid of the old Pledge of Allegiance altogether. He said that it's impractical to just change the pledge because children will continue to say "under God" out of habit or under protest.

"The whole point of the pledge was to unify the students, and it's not," Newdow said outside the hearing Wednesday. "(The pledge) has become divisive, not so much because it has been the atheists who have become discriminated (against), and they don't have so much of a voice. But if the Christians and the people who believe in God want to start throwing 'God' in there, the pledge will be continuing 'one nation indivisible,' while someone is saying 'under God.' And I think it's going to be a mess, and I think we're going to have to get rid of it."

Newdow also said there should possibly be some kind of a competition to come up with a new pledge.

Judge Lawrence Carleton in the hearing Wednesday told Newdow and attorneys for three Sacramento-area school districts that once the procedural motions are filed, he will quickly file an injunction against the schools, and then send the case to the Ninth District Circuit Court of Appeals. Carleton said he would not rule on the merits of the case himself.

School district attorney Terrance Cassidy said that the case is proceeding as expected.

"We're pleased that he announced that he would immediately enter a stay of any injunction that he would enter so that the school district would not change its day-to-day procedure and would be able to continue to recite the Pledge of Allegiance on a day-to-day basis throughout ... all the appeals," Cassidy said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: enemywithin; inbreeding; korsakovspsychosis; lawsuit; lefty; newdow; pledgeofallegiance; scumbag; syphiliticdementia; undergod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2005 4:54:10 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Newdow needs to fall asleep on a set of train tracks.


2 posted on 10/05/2005 4:55:39 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Having a bad complexion musta really had an effect on this jerks outlook on life.


3 posted on 10/05/2005 4:57:34 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"Newdow believes that it is time to get rid of the old Pledge of Allegiance altogether. He said that it's impractical to just change the pledge because children will continue to say "under God" out of habit or under protest."

I thought there was a small chance this guy was sincere about separation of church and state. This comment reveals that he is against free expression of religion. Hopefully this will end his 15 minutes.


4 posted on 10/05/2005 4:58:26 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

... or a set of "get over it, you crybaby atheist" tracks.


5 posted on 10/05/2005 4:59:28 PM PDT by Tim Long (No, Christine Todd Whitman, it's not your party too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: gondramB
under protest

So now it's unconstitutional for other children to say it if they chooooose to?

7 posted on 10/05/2005 5:00:16 PM PDT by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
He said that it's impractical to just change the pledge because children will continue to say "under God" out of habit or under protest.

Newdow rather resembles The Grinch now, doesn't he?

8 posted on 10/05/2005 5:01:04 PM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Geez...where to start. This was never an issue until the left made it so. They decided to continue litigation until a judgment was made in their favor. That's what makes this issue 'divisive'. They're demanding to win no matter what anyone else (or tradition or history) says. What is with liberals? If they decide not to say the pledge then fine. I don't like it but that's their choice. I'll choose to say it just as is with all the words. It's surprising how the party of choice to kill babies in the womb (and out) are so against any choices they don't favor. I don't think that occurs to them though.
9 posted on 10/05/2005 5:03:55 PM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Here's one he'd probably like:

I pledge allegiance to myself.

And to the nothingness for which I stand.

One man.

Without God.

With slavish submission to political correctness and America-hating apologies to all.

10 posted on 10/05/2005 5:03:59 PM PDT by Montfort (Check out the 200+ page free preview of The Figurehead by Thomas Larus at lulu.com/larus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I said it before and I'll say it again. In a way, I hope that Newdow outlives me. I want to be there when he comes face to face with the God he says doesn't exist.

Maybe if he goes first, St. Peter will let me see the replay.


11 posted on 10/05/2005 5:05:05 PM PDT by fredhead ( I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Newdow also said there should possibly be some kind of a competition to come up with a new pledge

How about Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer? Worked for the Nazis, and they didn't believe in God either.

12 posted on 10/05/2005 5:07:07 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
One good thing about Newdow is the fact that he's too arrogant or stupid to keep his true agenda to himself.
13 posted on 10/05/2005 5:07:44 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

why does 158 gr. JHP come to mind ?


14 posted on 10/05/2005 5:08:04 PM PDT by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
To: Mr. Newdow
RE: Pledge of Allegiance

Mr. Newdow,

what gives you the right to speak for an entire nation?
What sacrifices have you made that even remotely gives you the right to call for this change?

Have you served your country? Have you served in an office of politics? have you done anything else by complain?

Sir just because you have and issue with the pledge does not give you the right to take it away from the rest of Americian s who not only say it, but say it proudly.

You have been a lawyer and a doctor, both professions that require a modicum on intelligence to conduct. So it stuns me that you can be so irrational on this point.

What is your suggestion to replace it?

You and the 9th circus court misuse the 1st amendment to further your case. you attempt to use it in a form the framers did not intend, and that is also why this case will fail at the Supreme court level.

If you do not appreciate the right that this country bestows upon its people and allows them to exercise them freely. (which by the way includes reciting the pledge in its current form.) There are several other countries where your type of thought is more acceptable... perhaps you should talk to fidel casto or hugo chavez... they like you mindset...

being a defender of this country and its constitution, I served to protect peoples right to speak, worship, and act upon their other freedoms as they wish... not to see fellow citizen misuse the Constitution to try to restrict others rights.

Mr. Newdow you are a wrong, your attempts to change the core of this country is wrong, and you will lose in the end. You will not even be a footnote to history.

IYAOYAS,

AW

P.s. pray (oh wait you don't) we never meet and have a discussion..I will take every point you have and turn the Constitution against what you are doing.
______________________________________________________-___

Sorry for the rant folks but I have had enough of this idiot trying to misuse and abuse the Constitution for his own communist leanings..
15 posted on 10/05/2005 5:10:15 PM PDT by Americanwolf (I Served proudly.... how dare you tell me I have no convictions...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Newdow also said there should possibly be some kind of a competition to come up with a new pledge..

I guess he'd prefer this one:

I pledge allegiance
To the Federal Government
of the United Nations of Earth,
And to the wisdom of our leaders, in whom we trust,
One planet, under Kofi,
With prosperity and comfort for all.

16 posted on 10/05/2005 5:11:01 PM PDT by Maceman (Fake But Accurate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Maybe he could run out of gas at 2AM in Watts or Harlem.


17 posted on 10/05/2005 5:11:30 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheOracleAtLilac

logical choice? ;)


18 posted on 10/05/2005 5:11:31 PM PDT by Americanwolf (I Served proudly.... how dare you tell me I have no convictions...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

"One good thing about Newdow is the fact that he's too arrogant or stupid to keep his true agenda to himself."

Yep. this was a strategic blunder... and a lucky blunder for us.


19 posted on 10/05/2005 5:11:41 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Mr. Newdow, I'd like to introduce you to Chief Justice Roberts. He will be explaining the Constitution to you for the last time. And after that you will need to leave the continent.


20 posted on 10/05/2005 5:14:34 PM PDT by bpjam (Now accepting liberal apologies.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson