Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ROBERT BORK CALLS MIERS NOMINATION "A DISASTER"
Tucker Carlson ^ | October 5, 2005 | Press Release

Posted on 10/07/2005 3:50:01 PM PDT by Sam Hill

ROBERT BORK CALLS THE HARRIET MIERS NOMINATION "A DISASTER" ON TONIGHT'S "THE SITUATION WITH TUCKER CARLSON"

SECAUCUS, NJ - October 7, 2005 - Tonight on MSNBC's "The Situation with Tucker Carlson," former judge and Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork tells Tucker Carlson the Harriet Miers' nomination is "a disaster on every level," that Miers has "no experience with constitutional law whatever" and that the nomination is a "slap in the face" to conservatives.

Following is a transcript of the conversation, which will telecast tonight at 11 p.m. (ET). A full transcript of the show will be available later tonight at www.tv.msnbc.com. "The Situation with Tucker Carlson" telecasts Monday through Friday at 11 p.m. (ET).

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bork; miers; noproof; robertbork; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 941-943 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: Sam Hill

It's very reassuring to see the esteemed Judge Bork is on board with the thoughtomator school of constitutional jurisprudence =)


2 posted on 10/07/2005 3:54:26 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

^


3 posted on 10/07/2005 3:54:27 PM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

I've been waiting for the big guy to chime in on this one. Now we know.

And all the lock step Bushies will now bash Bork along with the rest.

You don't have to support Bush when he makes a mistake. I voted for him twice and sent $400 between 2000 and 2004.

A mistake is a mistake. Miers is NOT a constitutional scholar.


4 posted on 10/07/2005 3:55:54 PM PDT by putupjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

If Bork had really wanted to roll Miers under the bus, he should have came out in support of her.


5 posted on 10/07/2005 3:56:06 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ('That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
I respect Bork quite a bit - However I find it nice that we have someone from outside the bench (itself) on the SCOUTS -

I am sick to death of lawyers and judges having to run everything (even though Mires falls into that category).

I would be even happier if she wasn't even a lawyer!

She is going to be just fine. I trust GWB judgment on her.

I think we are seeing a slight tinge of "elitism" with regard to many on the right that are opposing her. The "she doesn't measure up" line is complete BS -

6 posted on 10/07/2005 3:56:10 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
I wonder what this Bork troll's DU screenname is.

/bushbot

7 posted on 10/07/2005 3:56:52 PM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Yes! Bork is with us (undefined us) too! Bush needs to know he cannot ignore, us right or wrong. We are HIS BASE.


8 posted on 10/07/2005 3:57:06 PM PDT by TeenagedConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
Trouble is, she just might impress the Committee and make a decent SC Judge.
9 posted on 10/07/2005 3:57:17 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
in his many conversations with Harriet Miers, going back more than a decade, he'd never discussed the question of abortion - I keep seeing this line, show of hands please, how many people discuss your position on abortion with associates or coworkers?
10 posted on 10/07/2005 3:57:23 PM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

It's not so much whether she measures up as whether there is anything to measure.


11 posted on 10/07/2005 3:57:52 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

I have.


12 posted on 10/07/2005 3:59:04 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
BORK: Not a bit. I think it's a disaster on every level.

Bwahahahahaa...

Obviously, not the answer Bush was hoping to hear.

13 posted on 10/07/2005 3:59:17 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (Karen Ryan reporting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Trouble is, she just might impress the Committee and make a decent SC Judge.

The operative word being "might".

14 posted on 10/07/2005 3:59:22 PM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Given a choice between a justice who understands that the RTKABA is an indivdual right and one who peers into the penumbra of Saturn and hems and haws about it, I'll take the first one. That means Miers over Bork.


15 posted on 10/07/2005 4:00:11 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Trouble is, she just might impress the Committee and make a decent SC Judge.

That has some worried that are against Miers.

16 posted on 10/07/2005 4:00:18 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
I would be even happier if she wasn't even a lawyer!

I guess you'd want a brain surgeon who wasn't even a doctor!!

17 posted on 10/07/2005 4:00:18 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
This means a lot considering Bork is the quintessential nomination disaster.
18 posted on 10/07/2005 4:00:28 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Where did you get this transcript? The Situation 10/7 transcript isn't up yet, and Bork isn't on the transcript for 10/6.


19 posted on 10/07/2005 4:00:41 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
Robert Bork - yet another one of the unappeasables. Why, I'll bet he never even supported Bush in the first place. Probably a pitchforker.

< /sarcasm >

20 posted on 10/07/2005 4:00:48 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 941-943 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson