Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maryland's O'Malley Affair -- MD4BUSH and Ryan O'Doherty
Stingray: A Blog for Salty Christians ^ | November 2, 2005 | Michael McCullough

Posted on 11/02/2005 11:22:47 AM PST by DallasMike

Free Republic is a longtime hangout for me and sometimes things get pretty interesting. The current big story has all the complexity and treachery of a Russian novel.

In October of 2004, a Freeper who goes by the handle of MD4BUSH began making posts on Free Republic urging Republicans to "play dirty" in the 2004 election. MD4BUSH represented himself as a staunch Republican. He lured another poster named NCPAC into his confidence and then posted alleged private "freep-mails" between the two. MD4BUSH baited  NCPAC into discussing sexual rumors about Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley. When MD4BUSH brought the exchanges to the attention of the Washington Post, NCPAC was fired from his government job in Maryland.

As National Review points out, however, MD4BUSH had to strongly encourage NCPAC into making any disparaging statements against O'Malley.

Most irksome is the Post’s repetition of the charge that Ehrlich appointee Joseph Steffen had been “spreading rumors about Mayor Martin O'Malley's personal life” until Steffen was forced to resign when the Post ran a series of stories about him. As I reported earlier this month, Steffen was almost certainly the victim of a set-up. In a series of private e-mails through a conservative discussion forum, he was asked again and again by someone using the screen name MD4Bush to comment on the rumors about O’Malley, a potential candidate for governor in 2006. Steffen was reluctant, and at one point actually wrote, “I cannot and will not offer suggestions that may be considered unethical concerning what you should do, campaign-wise. This is especially true concerning [Mayor O’Malley’s] personal life.” Eventually he did comment on the things that MD4Bush was writing. These e-mails were immediately turned over to the Post, which took Steffen’s comments out of context and has used them ever since to insinuate that Ehrlich was running a smear campaign.

Republicans Blamed

Baltimore Mayor O'Malley blamed Republicans for spreading the rumor. The mayor said that "widespread and persistent rumors were part of a 'concerted and orchestrated and sustained' effort and called on the Republican governor to apologize to his wife and children."

Within minutes of the last private exchange between MD4BUSH and NCPAC, the Washington Post released an article that named NCPAC as Joseph Steffen, who at the time served as an aide to Maryland's governor Robert Ehrlich, Jr. Several on Free Republic have noted that the timing appeared suspicious and that it was likely that the Washington Post used MD4BUSH as their source and that they considered him reliable.

MD4BUSH Identified as Democrat Party Operative

WBAL News is now reporting that Governor Ehrlich's Chief Counsel has released a letter to the governor that points to former Maryland State Democratic official Ryan O'Doherty as the man behind the identity of MD4BUSH. WBAL has posted a text from an e-mail that O'Doherty sent to Democrat supporters a few hours before the Washington Post published its story. O'Doherty claimed in a January 23rd Washington Post article to be working for the Maryland Democratic Party. He now claims, however, not to have been employed by the Democratic Party on February 8th, the time that the e-mail was sent. Following is an excerpt from the e-mail:

"There will be a big story in the Post either tomorrow or Thursday that credits Governor Ehrlich's staff for creating and spreading the nasty and untrue rumor about our Mayor and his family. Steve asked me to contact you to see if you could show your disgust by calling into WBAL Radio after the story hits. The guys on WBAL obviously could try to protect Ehrlich, so we need as many folks as possible to call 410-467-WBAL. I will e-mail the story to you as soon as it hits and read it carefully and then call in and raise hell. Don't call in until after the story is published in the Washington Post - It is top secret!"

The Washington Post Protects its Democrat Source

The Washington Post claims today that it did not know the identity of MD4BUSH but that Post Reporter Matthew Mosk was provided copies of the message exchanges between MD4BUSH and NCPAC last fall. Mosk claims that an "intermediary acting on behalf of MD4BUSH" gave him sign-on information to vie the private e-mails. Mosk claims that he corroborated the story by showing the e-mails to Steffen in order to gain confirmation.

Did the Washington Post really not know the identity of MD4BUSH? If they knew who he was, then why would they not have identified him as a Democrat operative? And if they did not know his identity, why would they have printed the story in the first place. How could the Post have verified a source when it claims to not know the source's identity?

In either case, this story is a poster child for not having "shield laws" for journalists. Mainstream journalists tend to run amok and lose all accountability — especially when it comes to subtly twisting a story to support pet left-wing causes.

The story suggests that the Washington Post could or should have known all along that this was a setup by the Democrats to blame a dirty trick on the Republicans.

A Possible Motive for O'Doherty

Ryan O'Doherty has ties with a man named Douglas Duncan through a group called Citizens for Quality Living — a group representing real estate developers. Both men were members of the group. Duncan is a fellow Democrat but is a political foe of Baltimore Mayor O'Malley.

Damian O'Doherty — Ryan O'Doherty's brother — was also President of Citizens for Quality Living in 2002, which was investigated by the Maryland Prosecutor's office as to whether it was a PAC under Maryland Law. The group was accused of running cable television ads and sending out political mailings during the Montgomery council primary without registering or filing financial statements. A panel of 3 Circuit Court judges decided that Citizens for Quality Living was not a PAC.

Things we Need to Know

It appears that Ryan O'Doherty sought to smear Democrat Mayor O'Malley on behalf of his Democrat friend Douglas Duncan and then to blame the dirty trick on the Republicans. Heads should roll.

  1. Was Ryan O'Doherty on the payroll of a Democrat organization at the time of the Washington Post story?
  2. Did Douglas Duncan have any knowledge of Ryan O'Doherty's actions to smear Mayor O'Malley?
  3. Did the Washington Post have any knowledge of the identity of MD4BUSH (Ryan O'Doherty)?
  4. If question 3 can be answered in the affirmative, did the Washington Post knowingly conceal the identity of MD4BUSH and allow Republicans to be blamed for the dirty trick?

I would feel a lot better if we could depend on the mainstream media to properly cover this story.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: baltimore; baltimoremayor; buckhead; crymeariver; democrats; demslimeshine; duncan; ehrlich; fired; fr; freerepublic; jimrob; jr; martinomalley; md4bush; mdgovernor; mdpolitics; ncpac; omalley; rumors; rumours; sadebaderinwa; steffen
I wrote this mainly so that I could get a handle on the story and to place the most significant information (with citations, of course) in a single post. Those of you who have been following this story won't find it of much use. I hope that newbies to the story will find the information valuable.

Stingray: Conservative blog

StingrayConservative Christian News and Commentary

1 posted on 11/02/2005 11:22:51 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182; TBP; jimrob; NCPAC; MD4Bush; PJ-Comix; kristinn; DrDeb; ohioWfan; EmilyGeiger; ...

Ping


2 posted on 11/02/2005 11:28:27 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

Excellent work!

I often wondered what happened to the NCPAC/MD4Bush caper.

IMHO WAPO is up to its usual CR*PO and could very well have instigated the whole setup....between one of their lefty reporters and O'Doherty.

sp


3 posted on 11/02/2005 11:30:59 AM PST by sodpoodle (I have no idea how I got here - but I like it and I plan to stay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
"...I would feel a lot better if we could depend on the mainstream media to properly cover this story."

No way that would happen! If Mosk received the information on MD4Bush through an intermediary he should have immediately smelled a rat. This is especially true with all the indications at Free Rebublic that the affair was instigated by a Democratic operative.

FR will still probably never receive a subpoena which would show which email address MD4Bush used in his regestration. The reason is that the investigation is controlled by the Democratic Majority on the legislative committee investigating the affair who has subpoena power.

They won't ask the question because they bloody well know where the information will lead and that is right back to the Maryland Democrats.

4 posted on 11/02/2005 11:52:01 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

If the Dems start accusing the Republicans of "dirty tricks" I hope this all turns into an ad.


5 posted on 11/02/2005 12:02:01 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike; NCPAC; MD4Bush; xcullen; Anti-Bubba182; Mo1; cyncooper; BillF; crushkerry; Howlin; ...
MD4Bush Ping!

Nice work.
6 posted on 11/02/2005 12:03:46 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Can Steffan sue the Maryland Democratic Party or Mosk in order to get the info out in a court of law? The man was set-up and lost his job. Maybe he can sue for defamation of character.


7 posted on 11/02/2005 12:09:49 PM PST by Republican Red (''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

I have been following this story and I found your post VERY helpful in sorting out this mess. I happen to live in a conservative part of Maryland and would appreciate your permission to forward your write-up to my US Congressman. I believe he may find it useful as well.

Thank you!


8 posted on 11/02/2005 12:16:16 PM PST by RebelBanker (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Maybe, but he hasn't so far. The Maryland Democrats control the legislative committees that have subpoena power to get the info, but they will block any GOP request for one and for obvious reasons.

The Washinton Post certainly won't apply any pressure for a subpoena.

9 posted on 11/02/2005 12:18:30 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
You did a good job of summarizing the story. You reached the same conclusions that I did, at 4 a.m. when I revised my story on the same subject, on Newsbusters.org Click below for my take, which is the same as yours except I also picked up on the Wa-Po's denial of knowledge, which raises more questions than it answers.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Democrat Official Outed as 'Sleaze' Source on Mayor O'Malley; Washington Post Ignored Story it Had (Updated)"

10 posted on 11/02/2005 12:19:58 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (Do you think Fitzpatrick resembled Captain Queeg, coming apart on the witness stand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
Thank you for the compliments. You are quite kind. You are welcome to send anybody any portion of the post thereof. If you send something by e-mail I would prefer that you offer a link to my blog, but do whatever you think will work best.

This story makes me wonder how many supposed Karl Rove dirty tricks are actually cooked up and implemented by Democrats against each other.

11 posted on 11/02/2005 12:24:09 PM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

I think hard copy would be safer - my Congressman is quite up in years and not likely to be very tech-savvy.

Good question about the dirty tricks. As with this case, I always try to ask, "Who benefits?"


12 posted on 11/02/2005 12:44:15 PM PST by RebelBanker (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike; maggief

I think this answers one of your questions. Thanks to maggief for posting this on an earlier thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1513580/posts?q=1&&page=101#170:




http://www.opensecrets.org/parties/expenddetail.asp?txtName=Ryan+O%27Doherty&Cmte=DPC&cycle=2004

Ryan O'Doherty


$1,247

8/30/2004

Payroll

Ryan O'Doherty

$1,247

9/15/2004

Payroll

Ryan O'Doherty

$1,247

9/30/2004

Payroll

Ryan O'Doherty

$1,247

10/15/2004

Payroll

Ryan O'Doherty

$1,247

10/29/2004

Payroll

Ryan O'Doherty

$1,247

11/15/2004

Payroll

170 posted on 11/01/2005 3:48:28 PM PST by maggief


13 posted on 11/02/2005 12:58:53 PM PST by Bush_Democrat (Ex-Democrat since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The O'Malley Affair- NCPAC, MD4Bush, Ehrlich, & more
various FR links & stories | 02-13-05 | the heavy equipment guy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1342165/posts


14 posted on 11/02/2005 1:10:40 PM PST by backhoe (The Silence of the Tom's ( Tired Old Media... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

FYI, that link to Open Secrets - the expenditures notated to him are for payroll for the Democratic Party itself, for 2004 - and is 'mistakenly' filed under "R" as in "Ryan O'Doherty" instead of "O'Doherty, Ryan" (lastname, firstname) as are all others. Hiding in plain sight??


15 posted on 11/02/2005 1:16:14 PM PST by Bush_Democrat (Ex-Democrat since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

It should provide an amusing and highly entertaining ride for all involved
(as far as safaris through Maryland liberal politics generally go - i.e., Mr. Toad will be driving).

16 posted on 11/02/2005 2:51:09 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; Alice au Wonderland

ping


17 posted on 11/02/2005 3:04:02 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

That is a really good executive summary.


18 posted on 11/02/2005 3:07:51 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

ah, you're here already. sorry.


19 posted on 11/02/2005 3:08:09 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
As late as yesterday the remedial Baltimore Sun was still trying to spin the Steffen angle to this story (as an example of Republican dirty tricks). Can you say "bias"?

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.olesker01nov01,1,1648873.column?coll=bal-home-columnists

20 posted on 11/02/2005 3:17:26 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc; Southack
The Washington Post claims today that it did not know the identity of MD4BUSH but that Post Reporter Matthew Mosk was provided copies of the message exchanges between MD4BUSH and NCPAC last fall. Mosk claims that an "intermediary acting on behalf of MD4BUSH" gave him sign-on information to vie the private e-mails. Mosk claims that he corroborated the story by showing the e-mails to Steffen in order to gain confirmation.

Using Southack's querry -- "We still don't know how NCPAC's identity was "revealed" (not exact quote) - suggests to me a 3rd party. Someone who DID know who NCPAC was, and who did the "netting" more than likely between Ryan and Wapo. (Or then via Ryan to WAPO.)

Is it possible that an exchange via post or freepmail took place between NCPAC and the "embed" (early on) which served as the basis for the creation of the MD4Bush identity -- and therefore, as the basis in initiating the scam upon NCPAC?

I've seen this play before in past. If so, more than likely the "net operative" is still here in FR, IME.

Thanks for all the pings, conservative in NYC. (need more java, here...)

21 posted on 11/03/2005 2:50:12 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

bump


22 posted on 11/03/2005 2:51:02 AM PST by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

Journolist BTT,

Interesting that Matthew Mosk was behind this.. bookmarking


23 posted on 07/22/2010 7:23:53 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson