Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senatorial Prospects (2006)
NRO ^ | November 09, 2005 | John J. Miller

Posted on 11/09/2005 11:53:38 AM PST by neverdem

E-mail Author

Author Archive

Send

to a Friend

Version

4:25 a.m.

Senatorial Prospects

Looking ahead to a year from now.

Professional pundits will spend the rest of this week debating whether the Democratic victories in New Jersey and Virginia yesterday provide a glimpse of what will happen in next year’s elections. It’s a quadrennial ritual of the chattering class.

Here are the facts: It’s been more than a decade since these off-year results seem to have foreshadowed elections that were still 12 months away. In 1993, the success of Republican gubernatorial candidates Christie Todd Whitman (in New Jersey) and George Allen (in Virginia) preceded 1994’s GOP triumphs. The last two cycles haven’t augured anything: Republican wins in 1997 were followed by Democrat congressional gains in 1998; the reverse was true for 2001 and 2002.

Herewith, a new look at next year’s Senate contests. (To check out appraisals from last spring, go here.)


ARIZONA: In a freaky-good year for Democrats, GOP senator Jon Kyl might be vulnerable. But ousting this conservative favorite probably would take a better candidate than former Democratic state party chief Jim Pederson. In an October poll, Kyl held a comfortable lead, 50 percent to 28 percent. LIKELY REPUBLICAN RETENTION

CALIFORNIA: Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein is a juggernaut. In June, the Field Poll tested her against Secretary of State Condi Rice. The result: Feinstein 56 percent, Rice 38 percent. DiFi did even better in a match-up against governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Meanwhile, the GOP continues to cast around for a sacrificial lamb. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

FLORIDA: Republican congresswoman Katherine Harris certainly doesn’t suffer from what hobbles so many other Senate challengers: Low name recognition. In her case, though, too many people don’t like her because of the role she played as Florida’s secretary of state in 2000. A GOP poll in September put the race at 48 percent for Democratic senator Bill Nelson and 36 percent for Harris, and although the contest may tighten this one is already beginning to discourage Republicans, who believe Nelson is a weak incumbent. If Harris shows lackluster fundraising numbers at the end of this year, there’s a chance that Rep. Mark Foley will jump into the race and give her a primary. LEANING DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

MARYLAND: Lt. Gov. Michael Steele’s decision to run for this open seat gives the GOP a legitimate chance to score an upset victory in this blue state. The Democrats’ best candidate probably is Rep. Ben Cardin, though he still has to defeat former Rep. Kweisi Mfume in a primary — and then retain a big supermajority of black voters in the general election. Republicans believe that if perhaps 15 percent of the state’s African Americans vote for Steele, who is black, then they’ll win. A new poll just published in the Baltimore Sun says the Cardin and Mfume race is neck-and-neck; in the general, Cardin leads Steele (41 percent to 32 percent) and Steele leads Mfume (39 percent to 37 percent). LEANING DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

MICHIGAN: As a first-term incumbent, Democratic senator Debbie Stabenow ought to be vulnerable. A June poll showed that only 32 percent of likely voters believe she deserves reelection, with 48 percent saying they will vote for another candidate or at least consider it. Yet the Michigan GOP hasn’t come up with a top-tier opponent. Rep. Candace Miller, who might be a formidable challenger, has shied away. Republican voters probably will choose between Oakland County sheriff Mike Bouchard and former Detroit council member Keith Butler. LEANING DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

MINNESOTA: The candidacy of GOP congressman Mark Kennedy probably represents the GOP’s best pickup opportunity of the cycle, as he competes for an open seat. The Democrats will choose between a pair of liberals, Amy Klobuchar and Patty Wetterling. LEANING REPUBLICAN TAKEOVER

MISSISSIPPI: Republican senator Trent Lott says he’s running for reelection, though the Washington rumor mill wonders if he’s having second thoughts in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, which destroyed his coastal home. If Lott were to retire, GOP congressman Chip Pickering probably would try to succeed him. Republican governor Haley Barbour also might feel some pressure to run. A good pick for Democrats would be congressman Gene Taylor. Other Democratic possibilities would include former governor Ronnie Musgrove and former attorney general Mike Moore. LIKELY REPUBLICAN RETENTION

MISSOURI: The Democrats didn’t recruit their best candidate to challenge GOP senator Jim Talent — that probably would have been secretary of state Robin Carnahan — but they may have gotten the next best thing in Claire McCaskill. Republicans may suggest that McCaskill is a lousy candidate because she lost the election for governor in 2004. But the last pol to lose a gubernatorial race and then run for the Senate successfully was Talent. The incumbent always enjoys an advantage, but this looks like a potential nail biter. LEANING REPUBLICAN RETENTION

MONTANA: Republican senator Conrad Burns will be a heavy favorite to defeat Democratic state auditor John Morrison. If 2006 turns out to be a very good year for Democrats nationally, however, this could become a race to watch. LIKELY REPUBLICAN RETENTION

NEBRASKA: Asking former governor Mike Johanns to become secretary of agriculture remains one of the most puzzling moves of President Bush’s second term. Didn’t he get Karl Rove’s memo on how to beat Democratic senator Ben Nelson? Republicans now will choose among a group of second stringers, including former attorney general Don Stenberg (who lost to Nelson in 2000). Republicans in Washington are high on Ameritrade executive Pete Ricketts, who can tap his personal bank account. LEANING DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

NEVADA: Do you enjoy watching Carters lose elections? If so, then this race is for you, because it looks to feature Republican senator John Ensign against presidential scion Jack Carter. As it happens, Nevada voters didn’t even support Jack’s dad in 1976; there’s no way they’re going to get behind Amy Carter’s big brother next year. In October, a Las Vegas Review-Journal poll put Ensign ahead, 59 percent to 25 percent. LIKELY REPUBLICAN RETENTION

NEW JERSEY: With Democratic senator Jon Corzine elected governor, the big question now becomes whom he will pick as his replacement in the Senate. His best choice might be acting governor Richard J. Codey; a member of the state’s congressional delegation also could win the Senate lotto. Whatever Corzine does, a primary battle looms. Republicans, in contrast, are getting behind Tom Kean Jr., the son of the former governor and a moderate who might be well suited to New Jersey’s political climate. TOSS UP

NEW MEXICO: Republican congresswoman Heather Wilson hasn’t ruled out a run against Democratic senator Jeff Bingaman in Shermanesque terms, but it appears as though she’s going to stay put in the House. That means Bingaman will stay put in the Senate. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

NEW YORK: The goal for Republicans isn’t to beat Democratic senator Hillary Clinton — she’s simply too popular for that. The goal is to give her enough worries in the Empire State that she cuts down on her out-of-state trips to fundraise for other candidates. “She’s a walking slush fund,” says Brian Nick of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. The likely GOP nominee is Westchester District Attorney Jeanine Pirro; a more conservative candidate is former Yonkers mayor John Spencer. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

NORTH DAKOTA: Republican Governor John Hoeven probably could beat Democratic senator Kent Conrad. He isn’t running, however, so this Senate seat deep in the heart of Bush country will remain in the hands of the blue party. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

OHIO: In one poll over the summer, only 31 percent of likely voters said that Republican senator Mike DeWine deserves reelection. Democratic congressman Sherrod Brown is probably too liberal to defeat him, but former House candidate Paul Hackett, who narrowly lost a special election outside Cincinnati in August, might have a chance. A new poll published in the Columbus Dispatch actually suggests that either Democrat could pull it off. If Hackett wins the nomination, he might also grab an endorsement from the National Rifle Association, which would be a big plus in this swing state. DeWine isn’t helped by the fact that GOP governor Bob Taft is wildly unpopular. LEANING REPUBLICAN RETENTION

PENNSYLVANIA: Democrats are drooling over this one — they think they’ve got Republican senator Rick Santorum in their crosshairs. A poll last month showed Democratic state treasurer Bob Casey Jr. leading the incumbent among likely voters, 52 percent to 36 percent. This race probably represents the Democrats’ best pickup opportunity. But before it’s over, it will look very close and conservative standard-bearer Santorum may yet prevail. TOSS UP

RHODE ISLAND: Many Republicans are still mad at GOP senator Lincoln Chafee, who couldn’t even bring himself to vote for President Bush’s re-election last year. (On his ballot, he wrote in the name of Bush’s father.) Now Chafee is trying to fend off a primary challenge from Cranston mayor Steve Laffey, who aspires to become the Pat Toomey of the 2006 cycle. Waiting in the wings are the Democratic contenders, secretary of state Matt Brown and former attorney general Sheldon Whitehouse. TOSS UP

TENNESSEE: In the race to succeed Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who has presidential ambitions, Democrats have rallied behind congressman Harold Ford Jr. Republicans will pick from a field of three: former congressman Ed Bryant, Chattanooga mayor Bob Corker, and Rep. Van Hilleary. Polls from last spring suggest a close general election, though the eventual GOP nominee probably will have an edge. LEANING REPUBLICAN RETENTION

VERMONT: With Republican-turned-“independent” Jim Jeffords retiring, this is an open seat — though Rep. Bernie Sanders, another “independent” who would caucus with the Democrats, appears to hold a big-time lead over potential challengers. Republicans in Washington are promoting businessman Richard Tarrant because he can self-fund. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

VIRGINIA: Democratic governor Mark Warner might have given Republican senator George Allen a real scare, but he isn’t running. As a result, Allen can coast through 2006 and start planning for 2008. LIKELY REPUBLICAN RETENTION

WASHINGTON: First-term Democratic senator Maria Cantwell looks beatable, and Republicans hope they’ve found a strong candidate in Safeco CEO Mike McGavick. A GOP poll in October put Cantwell ahead, 48 percent to 39 percent. LEANING DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

WEST VIRGINIA: Democratic senator Robert Byrd won’t be defeated — unless voters somehow become convinced that at the age of 88, he’s just too old for the job. Republicans have not yet settled on a candidate. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION

WISCONSIN: If former governor Tommy Thompson were to announce for this race, the Republicans might have a candidate who could beat Democratic senator Herb Kohl. An October poll had these two cheese-state political giants in a dead heat. Thompson has not publicly ruled out a challenge, but he hasn’t signed up for a campaign, either. Looks like Kohl can plan on coming back to Washington for another term. LIKELY DEMOCRATIC RETENTION


 

 
http://www.nationalreview.com/miller/miller200511090425.asp
     



TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota; US: Mississippi; US: Missouri; US: Montana; US: Nebraska; US: Nevada; US: New Jersey; US: New Mexico; US: New York; US: North Dakota; US: Ohio; US: Pennsylvania; US: Rhode Island; US: Tennessee; US: Vermont; US: Virginia; US: Washington; US: West Virginia; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2006; election2006; georgeallen; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2005 11:53:39 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Miller's not too optimistic. I hope his pessimism isn't rewarded.


2 posted on 11/09/2005 11:57:47 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Pretty accurate overall. I'm guessing we lose RI and PA, pick up MN, if everything breaks right there. So a net loss of one. Seems like a lifetime ago we were talking about a filibuster-proof Senate in '06. Quite a come down. But when your best candidates tell you to take a hike (Rossi in WA, Hoeven in ND, etc.) what can you do? Those were the days...


3 posted on 11/09/2005 11:59:58 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

According to that list there would little or no change either way.


4 posted on 11/09/2005 12:00:59 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
...this is pretty much exagerated optimism as the captain of the SS Titanic (AKA "W") is pretty much sailing in perilous waters due to continued screw-ups by crew members and ignoring warnings about dangers ahead. Unfortunately, if he doesn't right the ship, many of these good people will go down by the stern with him... Righting the ship means a change of course (with a clear and present victory in Iraq, no more unqualified lawyers being nominated for the SC, proactive planning in the face of natural disasters, ending unlimited spending, controlling illegal imigration etc.)
5 posted on 11/09/2005 12:01:53 PM PST by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Having Chaffee lose would be addition by subtraction.


6 posted on 11/09/2005 12:02:29 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Pretty accurate overall. I'm guessing we lose RI and PA, pick up MN, if everything breaks right there. So a net loss of one. Seems like a lifetime ago we were talking about a filibuster-proof Senate in '06. Quite a come down. But when your best candidates tell you to take a hike (Rossi in WA, Hoeven in ND, etc.) what can you do? Those were the days...

If we could get thru the off-year election in a president's second term and only lose one Senate seat, that would be a tremendous result historically.

7 posted on 11/09/2005 12:03:37 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

In other words, basically no change.

The one exception is Pennsylvania, where Rick Santorum is in trouble. This was a self-inflicted wound, caused by Rove and Bush leaning on Santorum to support Specter, a move that many conservatives still haven't forgiven.

Probably the two stupidest things Rove has done in the past five years were to put Gerald Parsky in charge of the California party and to support Specter against Toomey in the primary.


8 posted on 11/09/2005 12:03:37 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Michigan...Voting Independant, or staying home...I'm done with the globalists...


9 posted on 11/09/2005 12:05:34 PM PST by Iscool (Start your own revolution by voting for the candidates the media (and gov't) tells you cannot win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

In the long run, I think red states will always be in play.

We should rejoice any time we win one in a blue state....it's a gift.


10 posted on 11/09/2005 12:05:52 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Now, now.....get with the program. You are supposed to keep repeating "Yesterday didn't mean anything, yesterday didn't mean anything, all is well, all is well." Besides, all we have to do is follow our strategy of buying votes with new entitlement programs, instituting amnesty, um, guest worker programs and putting forth candidates who are moderates (aka Democrats with an R after their name) so that we can lure all those pesky independent voters, we'll clean up in '06!


11 posted on 11/09/2005 12:06:38 PM PST by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
I know it. That's why I found all the twitter-twatter twiddle-twaddle about picking up a filibuster-proof Senate in '06 (you saw a lot of it right here on FR) right after the '04 results, somewhat bemusing.
12 posted on 11/09/2005 12:07:03 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chimera
As hard as it is for me to say it, PA is a likely loss. While anything can happen between now and then, Santorum's popularity is at an all time low, and the RATs have picked their best possible candidate to challenge him.

I'm betting Chaffee finds a way to hold on in RI, and MO, MT and TN will be very close, but I'm looking at GOP retentions in all of those as well.

For the RAT seats, MN looks very promising for us and WA is winnable as long as McGavick comes across as a credible candidate.

What frustrates me is that we should be in a position to do much better. Liddy Dole's recruiting has been pretty much abysmal IMHO. Not persuading Johans, Hoeven, Rossi, Capito, and Mark Foley (among others) to run has kept us from having the true upper hand this cycle.

13 posted on 11/09/2005 12:11:22 PM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chimera
I know it. That's why I found all the twitter-twatter twiddle-twaddle about picking up a filibuster-proof Senate in '06 (you saw a lot of it right here on FR) right after the '04 results, somewhat bemusing.

If we lose only one seat net, that suggests that a small majority in the Senate for the R's is pretty much locked in for quite some time. 2006 will be the rats best shot to retake the Senate for a long time. If they fail, it ain't gonna happen for a while.

In fact, the one-seat loss described in the article would not be a big deal. Santorum would be replaced by a relatively conservative guy from MN. We would only lose Lincoln Chafee who might be replaced by a dem more conservative that he is (about half of the dems have an ACU rating better than Chafee's). So big deal. He doesn't vote Republican anyway and his seniority is a big problem for committee assignments.

If our only net loss in Lincoln Chafee, break out the party poppers!

14 posted on 11/09/2005 12:13:14 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Go Mfume.

Possible more retirements in the senate.

15 posted on 11/09/2005 12:15:52 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Those were the days...

We were also talking about a conservative judiciary, drilling in ANWR, more tax cuts, fiscal conservatism, curbing spending...

16 posted on 11/09/2005 12:16:26 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarcusTulliusCicero

...there is none so blind as those who refuse to see!


17 posted on 11/09/2005 12:18:38 PM PST by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

Newt should be in charge of the RNC. Maybe then we could get some good recruits. Or better yet, he needs to move to WA!


18 posted on 11/09/2005 12:19:18 PM PST by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I think that you can find great candidates still for those races. But if we end up one down because we lose Chafee, I'm not sure we lost that much -- he only was useful for giving us the leadership, and we don't need him for that. he wasn't a sure vote for Bush's court nominees, or for getting republican items out of committees.

And I'm not terribly upset if we don't beat a couple of conservative democrats from the south (nebraska and florida). They aren't as good as republicans, but they aren't the worst we could have.

I'd love to beat Sanders in NH, and Stabenow in Michigan. Also Cantwell in Washington. I wish Rossi would change his mind. It would be much better to beat one of these three than either of the two Nelson's.


19 posted on 11/09/2005 12:19:18 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

"Newt should be in charge of the RNC."

I agree Mehlmen has been mediocre at best.


20 posted on 11/09/2005 12:21:18 PM PST by DarthVader (Do something positive for your country today: Punch an America hating leftie in the mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson