Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WFTV Orlando "Outs" CCW Permit Holders
11/9/05 | self

Posted on 11/09/2005 8:09:47 PM PST by aberaussie

I am sorry I don't have the original article, but it has been removed from the WFTV web site. They did a big expose this week on the proliferation of concealed carry permit holders in Central Florda. On their web site they had links to excel files containing lists of permit holders by county including names, addresses, birth dates and permit numbers. Of course, that is all a matter of public record, but they made it easy to access and, from what I have been told by those who heard their promos on the TV and radio, they told people to go to their web site to find out which of their neighbors might be carrying. Here is the e-mail I sent to the station:

I would like to know for what purpose your station put links to the CCW permit lists on your website. Were you interested in letting criminals know where they could go to steal guns?

I hope you will be as quick to expose criminals' names and addresses as you are to "out" those law-abiding citizens who just want to be able to protect themselves legally.

And here is the reply I received:

Ms. Aberaussie, thank you for taking the time to share your opinion with us. We take your concerns very seriously, and we understand that you strongly disagree with the station's decision to publish state records identifying concealed weapon permit holders in Central Florida.

While we very much respect your viewpoint, we believe that our story regarding concealed weapon permits, as well as the identities of those who have elected to obtain those permits, is newsworthy and of legitimate concern to the public. The Florida legislature has deemed that the identity of permit holders, including their names, addresses, dates of birth and permit numbers, is public information. While the legislature has determined that law abiding citizens have the right to carry a concealed weapon, it also has determined that their fellow citizens have a right to know who has been granted such a permit.

However, to the extent that you have any continuing concerns about the publication on the station's website of the state's list of permit holders, you should be reassured by the fact that this information is no longer available on the website as a result of the station's normal process of removing dated materials. We hope this will ease any concerns you may have.

Again, we thank you for taking the time to contact us. Please know that we hear you, and we understand your concerns. Hopefully, we can move forward from here with mutual respect and a better understanding of each other's viewpoint on this matter.

Naughtin, Linda (CBI-Orlando TV) [Linda.Naughtin@wftv.com]

Now, I have trouble believing that they removed the links as part of their regular updating process. I checked the site several times during the day on Tuesday, and about mid-afternoon the links to the lists disappeared, but the article was still there. I do know that one person I know who was calling WFTV and Tallahasee regarding the article and the links was told that both the station and the Department of Licensing were flooded with calls.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: banglist; bias; ccw; guns; liberalmedia; media
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-95 next last
I thought that this might be of interest to my fellow CCW permit holders. Perhaps you would like to let Ms. Naughtin know what you think.
1 posted on 11/09/2005 8:09:47 PM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

i believe it is public info in ohio too.

i tried to convince my wife she should get her license, even if just to get her name on the list. kind of a "don't mess with me" list.

i agree that it is 'not right' that ccw holders have to be on a public list... but it think it is not right in that it is just plain silly.


2 posted on 11/09/2005 8:12:52 PM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

I'm not going to say what I think about this, but suffice it to say that if the left wants to play this type of game, the day may just be coming when they find out that others might be willing to up the anti as well.

Placing my name and address and private information in a public place so any person can target me, is a very hostile act.


3 posted on 11/09/2005 8:14:52 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
Were you interested in letting criminals know where they could go to steal guns?

That may have been their intent, but in reality, it will probably just give the criminals a list of houses to avoid (as well as a list of good targets).

4 posted on 11/09/2005 8:16:14 PM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

Ah yes, the lib 1st amendment crowd screws the 2cnd amendment crowd. What a bunch a ^*^$#(( s.


5 posted on 11/09/2005 8:18:53 PM PST by umgud (Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
"...we believe that our story regarding concealed weapon permits, as well as the identities of those who have elected to obtain those permits, is newsworthy and of legitimate concern to the public."

So here you have an media organ asserting that US citizens that legally obtain a CCW permit after having successfully completed the required due diligence pose a "legitimate concern to the public". What a bunch of flaming idiots.
6 posted on 11/09/2005 8:20:51 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

I HOPE some thug comes around to try to steal my guns.

Make my DAY, punk!


7 posted on 11/09/2005 8:21:06 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
Anyone that gets robbed that wasn't on the list should sue the radio station for making it easily accessible for criminals to figure out who was a safer target. All those that do have permits should sue the radio station if robbed for alerting criminals that expensive guns were in the house or worse, letting them know that they better come armed, putting you at a higher risk of danger.
8 posted on 11/09/2005 8:21:13 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
Their full of it!! If your neighbors have a right to know who's carrying a gun we wouldn't need to call it CONCEALED Carry Permits? DUH! Personally, I would be happy to wear a hip holster.

But in actuality, here in Fl, we do have some of the best CCW laws going and the no-retreat law going into effect has made us a punching bag of the lunies.

9 posted on 11/09/2005 8:21:29 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

Find out where that B lives. Then create a sign that is about 10' by 10' that provides her name, here address and her phone number. Then make sure you place in great big letters, that she DOES NOT have a gun.

Do it to ever member of the staff there at the nation.

See how they like it.

If your name is in the phone book, she and the station just made it possible for people to phone and harrass you. Time for some equal time...


10 posted on 11/09/2005 8:21:53 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

In Montana you can just look in the phonebook. Anyone in the phonebook probably has a gun. Anyone not in the phonebook, too, for that matter.


11 posted on 11/09/2005 8:22:28 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Time for some equal time...

That's what blogs and Free Republic are for!

12 posted on 11/09/2005 8:23:43 PM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
I want two things to be done to counter this and expose their hypocrisy:

Every female who wants to get an abortion in florida must get an 'abortion permit'.

The name of those who have an 'abortion permit' would be made public record, just like ccw permits.

Then I want to watch the lefties stammer and say "bbbut...bbut you have a right to an abortion!!! You don't need to get a permit!!!"

Ain't it grand how they think something that doesn't appear in the constitution is enshrined there, but something plainly stated as a basic right requires law abiding citizens to jump though hoops to exercise it?
13 posted on 11/09/2005 8:25:16 PM PST by flashbunny (Anybody want to trade Alito back in for Miers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I would like to know for what purpose your station put links to the CCW permit lists on your website. Were you interested in letting criminals know where they could go to steal guns?

Perhaps the Texas Freepers can tell me if I'm wrong on this, but isn't this exactly why Texas quit allowing this info out to the public? I could swear if was because of the reason listed above, too (increased burglaries at those residences).

14 posted on 11/09/2005 8:26:18 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy ("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

"In Montana you can just look in the phonebook. Anyone in the phonebook probably has a gun. Anyone not in the phonebook, too, for that matter."

They say universal gun ownership makes for a civil society.


15 posted on 11/09/2005 8:26:51 PM PST by strategofr (The secret of happiness is freedom. And the secret of freedom is courage.---Thucydities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

That was exactly what I was thinking!

Better yet, let's blast it over talk shows, put it on blogs, and list it right here on FR.

Anyone want to bet me they'd try to sue us?


16 posted on 11/09/2005 8:27:50 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy ("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

Public info yes, but the radical left reason for doing this is this TV station hates freedom, hates conservatism, hates gun ownership, is pro-gay, pro-Marxist and anti-American.

Boycott the sponsors of this rag. Tell the sponsors why. I live in an Orlando suburb. This station is anti-American.


17 posted on 11/09/2005 8:28:12 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

It's very peaceable up here!


18 posted on 11/09/2005 8:31:45 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

I think a list of women who murdered their children might be more useful as a public service.


19 posted on 11/09/2005 8:31:52 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
Gee, so nice of the to publish this "public Info".

So, in the interest of "Public Info", I suggest we start a thread whereby we get every person's name who works at WFTV, and publish EVERYTHING "Public" about them...who they donate to, what clubs/orgs they belong to, what books/videos they may rent/own...ANYTHING and EVERYTHING, nothing left out...

That includes ANY allegations that have been made against them, and maybe an interpid FReeper or 2 could do some "on the ground" research, as in follow them and track their EVERY move, as long as it's for the good of the public, and cannot be called "stalking"...unless we can say that WFTV is "stalking" CCW holders?

Who knows...we may find out some nice salacious "public dirt" on them...let them squirm under the scope (nice pun) for a while!

20 posted on 11/09/2005 8:34:12 PM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

Where I live, CCW permits are easily obtained by law abiding citizens. Every so often however, the local newspaper publishes the names and addresses of new permit holders.


21 posted on 11/09/2005 8:36:14 PM PST by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

My wife was taking a sewing class at the community college and the talk turned to guns. It turned out everyone was either carrying a gun or had one in the car. This was a bunch of ladies at a sewing class!


22 posted on 11/09/2005 8:36:41 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy
Wouldn't doubt it, but if they have free speech, then others must too.
23 posted on 11/09/2005 8:38:25 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

I like the gun free zone signs posted at some locations around Missouri. Those businesses have "rob me" posted for everyone to see.

Ahhhhh the innocence of idiocy.

I think posting the names and addresses of CCW permit holders is excessive. Recently the Missouri Sec of State Removed the personal addresses of government employees from the "official government listing" due to protection of confidential information and the fear of retaliation.
Sounds like a legitimate concern for CCW holders. If I have a non published phone number and somebody posts my number on a web site, could they be in violation of "NO CALL LIST" information sharing??
Contact your Atty General.


24 posted on 11/09/2005 8:38:27 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

I don't get your objection. I have no problem with anything of public record, being posted on the internet about myself. Public record is just that, public.


25 posted on 11/09/2005 8:40:07 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
An intimidation play by WFTV??? Reminds me of that line in the movie "Red Dawn" ... how did it go, "gather up all the form 4473's." I suggest contacting Mitch Needleman, the rep who is sponsoring that bill (HB285) to prevent confiscation, and ask for an amendment to restrict access to CCW information.
26 posted on 11/09/2005 8:40:17 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("To the terrorists, the media is a vital force multiplier" Brig. Gen. Donald Alston (USAF) 10/31/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Placing my name and address and private information in a public place so any person can target me, is a very hostile act.

Now we have a quandry. Is this information private or is it a matter of public record? It can't be both.

27 posted on 11/09/2005 8:41:11 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha

Remember the station when they apply for a new FCC broadcast license. There is a period that allows public comment on the licensing. Public input can be introduced into the record at the FCC licensing hearing. Make them explain how such action benefits the public.


28 posted on 11/09/2005 8:42:38 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp

What we really need is a list of all government employees with the addresses and telephone numbers in case we want to check up on them or give them some free advice.


29 posted on 11/09/2005 8:46:16 PM PST by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Now we have a quandry. Is this information private or is it a matter of public record? It can't be both.

It is a matter of public record, but my beef is that the station sensationalized the issue and encouraged people to take a look at the lists, then made it easy to do so. Our name begins with Ab, so we were on the first page people looked at. I don't know how easy the info is to get normally. I went to the Florida CCW site and did not see any links to lists of permit holders.

30 posted on 11/09/2005 8:47:24 PM PST by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

You can't sue someone for making a matter of public record, public. What part of public record don't you people understand?


31 posted on 11/09/2005 8:51:56 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
If even one of those names is a currently serving, retired or former LEO....it's a FELONY.
32 posted on 11/09/2005 8:58:33 PM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
legitimate concern to the public

This is America. You may not win but anyone can sue anyone. It shouldn't be but it is a public record. IMO, posting the list under a legitimate concern is putting legal gun owners in a criminal, to be watched catagory though. Criminals, who might not have even known to look this up now can just take a list with them as they cruise for targets. The ironic thing is that the people who aren't licensed may be the very ones picked.

33 posted on 11/09/2005 9:02:42 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
I thought that this might be of interest to my fellow CCW permit holders. Perhaps you would like to let Ms. Naughtin know what you think.

You should write them and tell them you will send letters to the FCC the next time their license comes up for renewal and recommend that it not be granted. Imagine if thousands of CCW permit holders write letters to the FCC?

34 posted on 11/09/2005 9:02:53 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

I don't particularly care if my name goes on a public list of ccw permit holders. If someone wants to come to my house to steal a gun, their first obstacle will be to avoid becoming a happy meal for a BIG dog, it gets worse from there, there is at least one armed person in the house 99.9% of the time.


35 posted on 11/09/2005 9:05:08 PM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie; Melas
Melas Now we have a quandry. Is this information private or is it a matter of public record? It can't be both.

There are all kinds of documents that are public record but are not allowed to be disclosed to third parties without permission of the person about whom the record is kept. It is a federal crime to disclose someones's college transcripts without permsission. Drivers licenses are public records, but only authorized persons are allowed to access the database of license information.

36 posted on 11/09/2005 9:11:04 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

So, Linda Naughtin wouldn't mind if we posted her address and phone number on this message board then? After all, it's in the public record.


37 posted on 11/09/2005 9:11:18 PM PST by mwyounce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
Several years ago when they were having that big brouhaha over part-time gun dealers my local paper did the same thing, obviously to put pressure on them.
38 posted on 11/09/2005 9:11:37 PM PST by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

I'd kinda like to be on a public "don't f*** with me list." Where's the problem?


39 posted on 11/09/2005 9:13:19 PM PST by Petronski (Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

You should have also mentioned that they were publishing a list of people (by omission) who did not posses the means of self defense, whereby possibly subecting those people to harm or even death.


40 posted on 11/09/2005 9:13:26 PM PST by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

As I remember it took me a little while to find the local sex offender database. When I did find it some of the entries were questionable or outdated.


It is nice to know that the MSM is going to keep me informed on who the gun owners are though!

NOTE: A half a serving of sarcasm accompanied this post. I appreciate you taking the time to write them a letter. It lets them know that they are being monitored.


41 posted on 11/09/2005 9:19:11 PM PST by JakeWyld (A little discipline. For my pet genius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp

hmmmmm, A smart criminal would have downloaded that excel file and then started casing the 'nicer' homes (rich libs?) that did not have CCW permit holders.

Did the stupid liberals just make themselves inviting targets in FLA?


42 posted on 11/09/2005 9:19:36 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

Were all counties linked?

What a way to cross reference names in a phone book and CCW permit holders! I hope that a "smart" crook does not think that all women listed in the phone book are not armed, just because no CCW permit is listed.

They sure would be shocked at my home. I would not like to be targeted, however!

To get property ownerhip information you must go in person and sign in at the clerks office...why should this information not be just as private...yet public!


43 posted on 11/09/2005 9:19:43 PM PST by 3D-JOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

It works in Switzerland.


44 posted on 11/09/2005 9:22:56 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Laverne; Mulder

Ping


45 posted on 11/09/2005 9:24:02 PM PST by ru4liberty (Ann fan no more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie

Perhaps you should find a way to publish the home address and phone number of every person who works at the station so that citizens can contact them with some "Hot" news story for the "Public Good"...


46 posted on 11/09/2005 9:26:39 PM PST by tubebender (Chris Matthews suffers from "IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas

The fact that the information is a public record is mind numbing stupidity.



47 posted on 11/09/2005 9:30:23 PM PST by 7mmMag@LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I say we post the names and addresses of the anti gun people so the criminals know who the easy targets are.


48 posted on 11/09/2005 9:38:27 PM PST by rdcorso (There Is No Such Thing As A Neutral Person During A War With Radical Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

all conservatives should own a gun and know how to use it. even if it means jumping through gov hoops.

overwhelm them.

imagine 1-2 million names on ccw list in a state. or twice that. etc.


49 posted on 11/09/2005 9:39:23 PM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY
To get property ownerhip information you must go in person and sign in at the clerks office...why should this information not be just as private...yet public!

I don't know what county you live in but I can look up just about all this info and any given property appraiser's website.

50 posted on 11/09/2005 10:02:51 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson