[papasmurf]

Yes, I can see the need to address the points/issues that most of the targeted voters will have a positive response to.
The one most helpful piece of info I've used, is the one that used a tit-for-tat method. That is,
Clinton said:blah, blah.
But then he said: Blah, blah.
Clinton promised: blah, blah.
But then he ordered, signed, did, etc.

The speeches he and his cronies made this last week are disgusting. I mean, here we are, with Libby being indicted for lying about a crime that never happened, and there's Clinton whining that his charges and impeachment were "egregious", blown out of proportion, and unconstitutional. The masses buy this crap, hook, line, and sinker!
Please explain to me, why women haven't gone after him with a nut-knife! This guy perjured himself to the point where he denied a woman her right to due process, a civil right! Many women have accused him of sexual harassment and downright rape. I don't get it? Compare that to an alleged pubic hair on a coke can...and hitlary stands by him, defends him, and lies for him.
I got off point, sorry.

:O)

P

[Mia T]

I suppose we will have to settle for virtual castration. For now, anyway.
Incidentally, she requires it as much as he, perhaps even more so.

On Neutered and Neutering

 

by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

 

With all the neutered talk of late

I thought y'all would appreciate

a relevant Shakespearean conversation

with EZ, a clinton chronicler Elizabethan.

 

[I had just asked the playwright if he had writer's block.]

 

 

EZ:

Think that thy bard hath now MacJeff forsaken?

In that would'st thou be verily mistaken.

Mayhap thou hast impatiently forgot

That facts comprise the essence of the plot.

 

 

MIA T:

Methinks thy bard hath schemes forsaken.

Mayhap thou art verily mistaken.

Plots comprise the essence of the facts.

Forsake the contrariwise artifacts.

 

 

EZ:

Gadzooks, could'st be thy bard is put to rout?

'Twould seem his veriest words are turned about.

Could'st show whereby effect doth flow from cause,

Would'st then be due a round of brisk applause.

 

Perhaps I could this point of view adopt,

For was not Bill by Hillary thus bopped

In like wise as MacJeff, upon the head,

And with a lamp, just as thy bard hath said?

 

Thus are the facts revealed for all to see:

Thy bard did make good use of ESP.

Contrariwise, the White House read my serial,

And sought to make good use of the material.

 

 

MIA T:

Thy bard's "effect doth flow from cause" linearity

And 'twould seem thy veriest good use of oracularity

'Twere not the nature of the plots I pricked thy bard to adopt

Withal Bill, like wise as MacJeff, upon the head was bopped.

 

Methought the plots thou would'st use sprung not o' telepathy.

Didst thou never hear the most traitorously corrupted conspiracy?

Brutus's heart wrapp'd in Hillaryous hide.

Interns and China suckling the impotent fool Cheapside.

 

What more paying play than a corrupted plot untainted

With thrice times two naked villains feinted?

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.

Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

 

 

EZ:

A point well made, experience vicarious

Was grounded in events utmost Hillaryous.

Betruth, the president sustained concussion

Ere I had even started the discussion.

 

But, lest thy bard be seen to make retreat,

The second bop was truly a repeat.

In consequence, I need no psychic hotline

To reconstruct an oft repeated plotline.

 

Now, as regards the wretched Cheapside brat,

And turmoil his concupiscence begat,

Need'st have no fear regards unfolding strife

O'er these events, for Art must copy Life.

 

 

MIA T:

Eureka! (Not Gadzooks!)

Though I have neither wit, nor words, nor playbooks

Thy bard this simpleminded poster avoidth plagiarize.

(Withal thy bard's own baseborn tendency contrariwise.)

 

Now, as regards the wretched Cheapside brat,

And turmoil his concupiscence begat,

Methinks MacJeff's crook'd feelpolitik, the lasix death, his solipsistic sex

Thou must put in cold blood'd cardiovascular context.

 

The brain deviseth laws for the blood,

but the brain 'tself is ne'er understood.

The King's crook'dness flows from limp circulation.

Methinks the solution is swift amputation.

 

 

EZ:

Thou place thy versifier in a quandary,

Redoubling thy most sharp-edged entendre.

The gist of they intent can I but gape on.

Dost thou propose the prez be made a capon?

 

In blood caught up these wretches play their role,

But this must not become Le Grand Guignol.

Lest those of delicate mien be made to faint,

'Twere better I should exercise restraint.

 

Mind you, Act I, scene 4 drips the odd bit of gore here and there.

 

 

MIA T:

Thy bard's excessive predilection metaphorical

confuseth redoubled sharp-edged entendre with one blunt oracle.

 

Forsooth, thy bard surely knowth,

Phallus on eunuch can't growth.

Plucking capon from hen's an impossibility,

Unless the cluck's hermaphroditic Hillary.

The fundamental clinton rape issue isn't whether hillary 'believed bill,' or 'enabled bill'.
The fundamental clinton rape issue is that hillary participated.

While Sean Hannity correctly zeroed in on the clinton rape of Juanita Broaddrick, one of the issues that should automatically disqualify missus clinton for any position of power, he sabotaged his own line of attack.

Hannity's setup question, whether hillary 'believed' bill, was a dodge. And a not very artful dodge. As Sean Hannity knows well, the issue isn't whether hillary 'believed bill'; the issue is that hillary participated. In that rape as well as in all the other clinton rapes and predations.

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL, SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL

[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

Hannity of all people should know this. He interviewed Broaddrick on precisely that point. (A video and analysis of that interview is in the works.)

Broaddrick described to him in shocking detail the meeting with hillary clinton that occurred several weeks after the rape. missus clinton went to that meeting for the express purpose of warning Broaddrick to keep her mouth shut. (She and the rapist entered the room, she approached Broaddrick (whom she had never met before) while a slinking rapist stayed behind, she proceeded to warn Broaddrick, she and the rapist immediately left.)

In Hannity's original Estrich-Broaddrick interview, he was honest about the real issue. But even then he ultimately failed because he neglected to expose the following clinton casuistry being spun by Estrich:

1. the 'statute of limitation' on rape should apply to the clintons in the Broaddrick rape,
2. the postmodern construction of 'rape,' i.e., the definition of rape is subjective, i.e., what is considered rape by the victim isn't necessarily considered rape by the rapist,
3. the definition of rape has morphed over time, i.e., what is rape today wasn't necessarily rape in the '70s.

 

On point 1, the statute of limitation on rape applies in a court of law, not in the voting booth. The question we are deciding isn't whether the clintons should be thrown in the slammer (another matter for another day); the question is less onerous, (from the clintons' perspective, anyway): Do the clintons have the character to be president?

The reductio ad absurdum is Christopher Shays' comment, made after he viewed the Ford building evidence on the rape of Broaddrick: "I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say it that way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

And yet Shays voted not to impeach. Purportedly because he asked the wrong question. ("Where was the obstruction of justice?") (Any cognitive dissonance Shays may have experienced rendering that verdict was no doubt assuaged by the political plum clinton gave to Mrs. (Betsi) Shays...)

And so we had two more years of the clinton Nano-Presidency. And with it, inexorably, 9/11.

Regarding points two and three: Juanita's bitten lip, swollen to twice its normal size, the hallmark of a serial rapist, is the obvious counterexample.

Real Rape should be required reading... for Susan Estrich.

 

ADDENDUM:

Ignoring the facts of the case, ignoring the 'real rape' paradigm, indeed, ignoring her own writings on 'real rape,' Susan Estrich, on Hannity and Colmes, pimping for yet another rapist presidency, dismissed out of hand Juanita Broaddrick's credible charge, that she was raped by the clintons.

In response, Juanita Broaddrick has offered to meet with Susan Estrich to discuss the matter. Estrich turned her down flat. (SUSAN ESTRICH RESPONDS TO JUANITA BROADDRICK'S OFFER TO SPEAK ABOUT HER RAPE -- "not interested")

 

THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)
Mia T, 10.27.05