Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA
Aljazeera | 11.18.05 | Mia T

Posted on 11/17/2005 9:03:19 PM PST by Mia T

A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA



by Mia T, 11.17.05


 

 

 

 





id you see it? More to the point, did the American press?

bill clinton made page one of Aljazeera today. The reportage was a schizophrenic mix of schadenfreude and agitprop. It was the story of an impeached ex-president of America trashing America--to standing Os--in the Arab state of Dubai--in the middle of a war zone--only several hundred miles from the American troops. And, if that weren't enough, the traitor pocketed $200,000 from the Arabs for his efforts.

Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize by ignoring terrorism, clinton has apparently decided to intensify his America-bashing on foreign soil, the method employed by Jimmy Carter to great (if somewhat belated) effect: Carter received his 1978 Peace Prize in 2002.

Meanwhile, back in the Senate, the missus, the other half of the clinton construct, maintains her hawkish pose (although not without bird problems of another sort).

Yet another example of the clinton conflation ploy, (see SCHEMA PINOCCHIO: how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor), this variant allows "clinton, the construct" to hold two mutually exclusive positions simultaneously, thereby enabling the missus to avoid in '08 the trap that repeatedly ensnared the ever 'nuanced' Kerry in '04.

Do you now understand how stupid the clintons think you are?

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t



by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

COMPLETE ARTICLE

 

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY

by Mia T, 11.14.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004


SCHEMA PINOCCHIO
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor

by Mia T, 8.03.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MAD hillary series #5
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN
FOR AMERICA
FOR THE WORLD


They turned our bridge to the 21st century into a tunnel back into the 19th century. Back us out of that Republican tunnel, fill it in, go back across the bridge.... We'll have a giant celebration when we come back to Columbus in 2020. There's nothing more wonderful than making dreams come true.

hear hillary clinton
address to the
Democratic Leadership Council
Columbus, Ohio
7.31.05






issus clinton is a dud.

I could say she has all of bill clinton's baggage and none of his charm, except I don't find bill clinton charming. What she lacks, in my view, is lubricant. Snake oil. She grates.

It's more than simple dislike. You don't want to see her; and you definitely don't want to hear her.

Missus clinton is everyman's worst nightmare: ex-wife, fishwife, frigid wife, mother-in-law; worse, the abusive Nazi commandant in the Lina Wertmuller masterpiece. When she humiliates, which is always, she dons the military-issue undershirt, she grabs the whip.

The clintons are clearly aware of this problem and are attempting to mitigate it with veneer.

Their first ploy is to pushpoll to artificially jack up missus clinton's numbers; this is a relatively easy task, given a compliant press. This illusion of electability is intended to fool the voters, activate the herd mentality and ultimately fool the smart money of the David Geffen-Harold Ickes stripe.

It won't work. Missus clinton has 100% name recognition. Any vote she doesn't already have, she won't get. Conversely, many voters have 0% information on the clinton abuses of power and utter failures. From this it follows that many votes she has today, she won't have tomorrow.

Their second ploy is to conflate "bill" and "hillary." "The clintons" become a single construct. Missus clinton arrogates bill's "bridge to the 21st century " as "theirs." And, by lifting the lyrics straight from Pinocchio, she becomes "the man from 'hope'."

The danger here for missus clinton is that with the bridge and the hope come the abuses and the utter failures.


AFTERWORD:

Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches? They make her sound like a cross between Pinocchio on Halcyon and a clueless tourist from Park Ridge, Illinois driving into Manhattan during rush hour. Oops.

And the plagiarizing... I mean, the clintons are shameless. And it isn't only Pinocchio.

In 2002, I wrote that the bridge to the 21st century was, arguably, clinton's most delusional conceit, that it overshot the mark by at least 1400 years.

To be fair, missus clinton's 19th-century reference is to that <yawn> retrograde 'retrograde Republicans' cliché, whereas my 7th-century reference is to the retrograde-in-fact islamofascist terrorists, whose jihadi declarations and acts of war against us the clintons willfully ignored for eight long years--allowing al Qaeda to grow exponentially in strength and reach, setting us up--very nicely, thank you--for 9/11 and its cataclysmic aftermath.



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: badart; badhtml; betrayal; clinton; clintonconstruct; clintoncorruption; clintontreason; conflation; dud; freaky; freakyweird; herewegoagain; hillaryisadud; hillarypuppet; impeach; impeachclinton; impeachinabsentia; impeachment; insanebabblings; iraq; morecrap; noartschool; sedition; treason; ugly; weird
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-95 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2005 9:03:21 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I'm sure your postings are excellent, but your artwork is... distracting.


2 posted on 11/17/2005 9:06:29 PM PST by Hoosier-Daddy (It's a fight to the death with Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


3 posted on 11/17/2005 9:10:17 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Democrats are traitors....
Republicans are AMERICANS


4 posted on 11/17/2005 9:15:40 PM PST by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

What gets me is that he still collected an engagement fee. A former President speaking on current American policy, against that policy, is a big break from tradition and a dangerous precedent.

There is a reason why former Presidents are supposed to remain out of politics, except when tapped by sitting Presidents to use their celebrity status for some cause or another. Comments regarding current policy are supposed to be noncommittal at worst, or non-forthcoming at best.

Former Presidents are supposed to fade into the woodwork. It is a very important part of our traditions that is geared toward maintaining the stability of our Republic. It is just as important as the immunity former Presidents receive from prosecution for actions taken while they were in office. These are traditions that are important to securing our Republic from the same forces that brought down past democracies and republics in our distant past.

The Clintons have too much pride in themselves, and not enough love for our country. They must be viewed with suspicion because they will put their good over the good of the nation. They have done this in the past, and they will do it again, and the immunity tradition has given them is being abused by them. If they continue to push the envelope, I wonder if Bush would be willing to set aside tradition to put the Clintons in their proper place.


5 posted on 11/17/2005 9:25:26 PM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

Thanx. It's supposed to be....


6 posted on 11/17/2005 9:28:48 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
excellent points.
If they continue to push the envelope, I wonder if Bush would be willing to set aside tradition to put the Clintons in their proper place.

...which is the slammer, at a minimum.

Bush, I'm afraid, doesn't seem to understand their danger.

7 posted on 11/17/2005 9:40:04 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jla

ping


8 posted on 11/17/2005 10:19:52 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

ping


9 posted on 11/17/2005 10:20:22 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

ping


10 posted on 11/17/2005 10:21:44 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

ping


11 posted on 11/17/2005 10:22:03 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic

ping


12 posted on 11/17/2005 10:22:25 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

One of your best!


13 posted on 11/17/2005 10:23:23 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon

ping


14 posted on 11/17/2005 10:25:05 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"Bush, I'm afraid, doesn't seem to understand their danger."

You are so right. Your post (and the artwork is, as usual, insightful and brilliant.

Well done.


15 posted on 11/17/2005 10:41:55 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

<< A CALL TO IMPEACH CLINTON IN ABSENTIA >>

G-d bless you, Dear Mia but aren't you being too kind?

Why stop at only one of the evil recidivist bastards?

Or waste time with impeachment?

Sedition?! subversion?! Treason?! All in time of war and in the face of our nation's enemies.

The example set by General Washington in the matter of Major John Andre: - ordered by Military Tribunal and carried out at noon of October 2, 1781; - springs to mind as an excellent example of how the Clintons' perfidies might be put behind us.

And perhaps behind each of them?

Back-to-back at high noon!

Short drop.


16 posted on 11/17/2005 10:44:18 PM PST by Brian Allen (Patriotic, Immigrant & therefore Hyphenated-AMERICAN-American & Aviator by choice. Christian byGrace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Does the US have an extradition treaty with Absentia?


17 posted on 11/17/2005 10:47:14 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
A former President speaking on current American policy, against that policy, is a big break from tradition and a dangerous precedent.

Thanks for putting into words what I find the most disturbing about this whole deal.

I believe Clinton is consistently attempting to diminish the US as a superpower.

That is his theme nite and day. We must give up power. We must share. We must come under a multi-national governance.

18 posted on 11/17/2005 10:53:15 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

<< Bush, I'm afraid, doesn't seem to understand their danger. >>

Wish I could any longer believe that.

More and more I am of the opinion Bush's primary instinct insofar as the Clintons are concerned is to first protect the Oligarchy - 'do unto others - and second centers on his belief in the inseparability of the Office and its occupants.

And never mind the insurmountable mountain of evidence - down to their looting of the knives and forks - of their having spent eight years bemanuring the joint. And their along the way and for pennies on the Million Bucks flogging to their Peking masters a Trillion Dollars worth of our Nation's most vital nuclear and military, computer, rocketry, engineering, aeronautical and every other imaginable secrets and treasures.

Bush knows all of that.

Bush is a politician.


19 posted on 11/17/2005 11:07:32 PM PST by Brian Allen (Patriotic, Immigrant & therefore Hyphenated-AMERICAN-American & Aviator by choice. Christian byGrace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

I agree with you. There's a patrician mindset that almost works in opposition to the political one.

But, in the end, it necessarily reduces to a failure to understand the danger; if he understood the danger, how could it not trump all his other priorities?


20 posted on 11/17/2005 11:20:44 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

You're right, of course.

And you've cleared away my denial and my projection.

Now just how dangerous does that make Bush?

Gulp.


21 posted on 11/17/2005 11:48:20 PM PST by Brian Allen (Patriotic, Immigrant & therefore Hyphenated-AMERICAN-American & Aviator by choice. Christian byGrace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
You are the best, Mia. Keep your graphics flying.

You may force me to upgrade my system periodically, but it is a small price to pay for your well researched and well founded insights.

Regards,

22 posted on 11/18/2005 3:30:06 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Billy Jeff Perv got what he craves most: the money and the adoration of the crowd. Country and conscience are at the bottom of his list.

You're on fire this week, Mia. Great work!

23 posted on 11/18/2005 3:31:27 AM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

thanx. :)


24 posted on 11/18/2005 3:43:09 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


25 posted on 11/18/2005 4:08:55 AM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

bump and thank you.

What country? What conscience?

... And as for the money and adoration, note how the seditious, self-serving, poor excuse for a human being has to go abroad for both... And after yesterday, when he did what he did less than a few hundred miles from soldiers spilling their blood for him (as worthless and as despicable and as treasonous as he is), this will be increasingly true, I suspect....

Imagine the damage he would do if he and his puppet were back in the White House.... Scratch 'imagine'... Remember.


26 posted on 11/18/2005 4:09:30 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Great Post Mia

As usual


RB


27 posted on 11/18/2005 4:10:52 AM PST by Rightly Biased (Valor is a Gift.Those having it never know for sure whether they have it till the test comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

;)


28 posted on 11/18/2005 4:11:05 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

He's dead Jim.


29 posted on 11/18/2005 4:19:35 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000; Mia T; nopardons
There is a reason why former Presidents are supposed to remain out of politics, except when tapped by sitting Presidents to use their celebrity status for some cause or another. Comments regarding current policy are supposed to be noncommittal at worst, or non-forthcoming at best.

You are totally correct of course. But unfortunately the old media types will never inform the unknowing and disinterested public about this presidential tradition. So again Clinton gets to spew anything he wants to destroy this administration and the country.

I've been around for about 59 years, and I have never seen the old media as biased and outrightly lying and deceptive as they have been for the past few years.

I fear for the republic.

We all know there is a growing conservative "new media" that is telling much more truth, but at the same time, the populace is being dumbed down at a greater and faster rate than ever. Therefor the old media is still as effective as ever. They have taken to passing along their biases and distortions in advertising, on tv dramas, in movies, and certainly even in children's cartoons and other programming.

The bias and the destruction is worse than ever.

****

The old established/liberal/socialist media is America's most ruthless, relentless, and destructive enemy.

***

30 posted on 11/18/2005 4:42:25 AM PST by beyond the sea (Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia didn't you read, history was rewritten a couple of weeks ago.


31 posted on 11/18/2005 4:46:31 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Is this a real recording? He sounds either drunk or drugged or in early stages of dementia. He's almost a parody of himself now.


32 posted on 11/18/2005 4:50:12 AM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe

Exactly!


"WE" must give up power. "WE" must share. "WE" must come under a multi-national governance and "I" will lead you!


33 posted on 11/18/2005 4:54:50 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lijahsbubbe; coconutt2000
Thanks for putting into words what I find the most disturbing about this whole deal.
I believe Clinton is consistently attempting to diminish the US as a superpower.
That is his theme nite and day. We must give up power. We must share.--
Lijahsbubbe

excellent point!
Recall this:


William J. Broad suggests (
Spying Isn't the Only Way to Learn About Nukes, The New York Times, May 30, 1999) that clinton had another reason to empower China and disembowel America. Broad argues that clinton sought to disseminate our atomic secrets proactively in order to implement his postmodern, quite inane epistemological theory, namely, that, contrary to currently held dogma, knowledge is not power after all -- that, indeed, precisely the opposite is the case.

Broad writes in part:

Since 1993, officials say, the Energy Department's "openness initiative" has released at least 178 categories of atom secrets. By contrast, the 1980s saw two such actions...

Its overview of the disclosures, "Restricted Data Declassification Decisions," dated January 1999 and more than 140 pages long, lists such things as how atom bombs can be boosted in power, key steps in making hydrogen bombs, the minimum amount (8.8 pounds) of plutonium or uranium fuel needed for an atom bomb and the maximum time it takes an exploding atomic bomb to ignite an H-bomb's hydrogen fuel (100 millionths of a second).

No grade-B physicist from any university could figure this stuff. It took decades of experience gained at a cost of more than $400 billion.

The release of the secrets started as a high-stakes bet that openness would lessen, not increase, the world's vulnerability to nuclear arms and war. John Holum, who heads arms control at the State Department, told Congress last year that the test ban "essentially eliminates" the possibility of a renewed international race to develop new kinds of nuclear arms...

"The United States must stand as leader," O'Leary told a packed news conference in December 1993 upon starting the process. "We are declassifying the largest amount of information in the history of the department."

Critics, however, say the former secrets are extremely valuable to foreign powers intent on making nuclear headway. Gaffney, the former Reagan official, disparaged the giveaway as "dangling goodies in front of people to get them to sign up into our arms-control agenda."

Thomas B. Cochran,:..."In terms of the phenomenology of nuclear weapons...the cat is out of the bag."

...[F]ormer Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the "extensive declassification" of secrets had inadvertently aided the global spread of deadly weapons. ["inadvertently" ???!!!!]

Broad would have us believe we are watching "Being There" and not "The Manchurian Candidate." His argument is superficially appealing as most reasonable people would conclude that it requires the simplemindedness of a Chauncy Gardener (in "Being There") to reason that instructing China and a motley assortment of terrorist nations on how to beef up their atom bombs and how not to omit the "key steps" when building hydrogen bombs would somehow blunt and not stimulate their appetites for bigger and better bombs and a higher position in the power food chain.

But it is Broad's failure to fully connect the dots -- clinton's wholesale release of atomic secrets, decades of Chinese money sluicing into clinton's campaigns, clinton pushing the test ban treaty, clinton's concomitant sale of supercomputers, and clinton's noxious legacy -- that blows his argument to smithereens and reduces his piece to just another clinton apologia by The New York Times.

But even a Times apologia cannot save clinton from the gallows. Clinton can be both an absolute (albeit postmodern) moron and a traitor. The strict liability Gump-ism, "Treason is as treason does" applies.

The idea that an individual can be convicted of the crime of treason only if there is treasonous intent or *mens rea* runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare.

Calling his position on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty "an historic milestone," (if he must say so himself) clinton believed that if he could get China to sign it, he would go down in history as the savior of mankind. This was 11 August 1995. (Similar motivation (and danger) in clinton's arm-twisting, phony rapprochement in the Mideast.)

According to James Risen and Jeff Gerth of The New York Times, "the legacy codes and the warhead data that goes with them" -- apparently stolen from the Los Alamos weapons lab by scientist, Wen Ho Lee aided and abetted by bill clinton, hillary clinton, the late Ron Brown, Sandy Berger, Hazel O'Leary, Janet Reno, Eric Holder and others in the clinton administration [not to mention congressional clinton accomplices Glenn, Daschle, Bumpers, Harkin, Boxer, Feinstein, Lantos, Levin. Lautenberg, Torricelli et al.] -- "could [especially when combined with the supercomputers that clinton sold to China to help them finish the job] be particularly valuable for a country, like China, that has signed onto the nuclear test ban treaty and relies solely on computer simulations to upgrade and maintain its nuclear arsenal. The legacy codes are now used to maintain the American nuclear arsenal through computer simulation.


audio

Most of Lee's transfers occurred in 1994 and 1995, just before China signed the test ban treaty in 1996, according to American officials."

Few who have observed clinton would argue against the proposition that this legacy-obsessed megalomaniac would trade our legacy codes for his rehabilitated legacy in a Monica minute and to hell with "the children."

Mia T, 8.06.05
HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman


34 posted on 11/18/2005 4:56:56 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

This would be far too cumbersome a process.

A better course would be to tie a rope around his leg and drag him around the mall a couple of times.


35 posted on 11/18/2005 4:59:37 AM PST by bert (K.E. ; N.P . (FR = a lotta talk, but little action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

You are so right!


36 posted on 11/18/2005 5:00:13 AM PST by The Mayor ( As a child of God, prayer is kind of like calling home everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

A+ in content and visual! You are truly in a class of your own.
Xprez is still out of control; it was never the will of the people, it was and is his will. he is a king in his own mind and the clueless bow under the spell of the witch. they are worse than any hurricane w/their distruction.


37 posted on 11/18/2005 5:10:09 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Good stuff, Mia. The American Democrats, IMHO, would love to see the most ardent radical SHIITE faction rule the world. Under the guise of the UN, no doubts.


38 posted on 11/18/2005 5:29:56 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia

thanx. :)

I don't believe the Ds want to cede power to the Shiites; I don't think, therefore, that they have thought this thing through to its logical conclusion.

They are truly power-obsessed idiots, this even discounting for the self-selected career variable.


39 posted on 11/18/2005 5:58:41 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
You are right about them being "power obsessed". And I also agree that they haven't thought this whole thing through to its logical conclusion. But, the Ds are whole hog in debt to the UN, the NCC, the WCC, the ICC, ad nauseum, that given their utterings about time-tables and withdrawls tells me they've got plenty of intel which fosters them into believing if islomafascism is given its head, grown larger, it will take on the US, and the "Ds" can be forgiven their debt, non-secular Christianity wiped off the map, -- and their ultimate goal of ONE WORLD ORDER can be achieved. Obviously, they believe, the entire world under one "ruler" and "one religion" is the way to go.

Hitler thought it too.

40 posted on 11/18/2005 6:04:03 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

clinton and his wife are delusional, encouraged by a compliant press, a disinformed, largely ignorant base and, of course, by the enemies of America.

When will Bush begin to do what he must? He ought to heed his own words, which I paraphrase: Those who aid and abet the enemy are equally guilty.


41 posted on 11/18/2005 6:06:55 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

fyi


42 posted on 11/18/2005 6:31:02 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jla

ping


43 posted on 11/18/2005 6:58:24 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Impeachment is NOT the answer for clinton and carter. TREASON is the crime they could (and should) be found guilty of.


44 posted on 11/18/2005 7:01:45 AM PST by phil1750 (Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

OUTSTANDING AS USUAL.. We need to cancel his passport and not allow him back into the country!


45 posted on 11/18/2005 7:04:12 AM PST by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T


46 posted on 11/18/2005 7:07:57 AM PST by devolve (<--- (--------(--do not check out my lame FR home page--)--------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b

thank you carlo. any new recipes? ;)


47 posted on 11/18/2005 7:10:26 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: devolve

the sad--(well, maybe not so sad)--irony is that since his open-heart surgery, it seems that he really cannot recall... (Have you noticed the vacant, faraway look in his eyes when he is recounting even the most mundane of stories?)


48 posted on 11/18/2005 7:14:42 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

bump


49 posted on 11/18/2005 7:22:03 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

thanx :)


50 posted on 11/18/2005 7:23:13 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson