Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Debate on Murtha Proposal (OH Rep Jean Schmidt "cowards cut and run, Marines never do.")
AP ^ | 11/18/2005 6:12:20 PM | AP

Posted on 11/18/2005 5:12:51 PM PST by Former Military Chick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241 next last
To: MilleniumBug
Anyone have a video clip of Jean Schmidt's speech????

Political Teen - Home Page

Scroll down a bit.

It's a 3.8 MB WMV file.

They don't like hotlinks to the video, otherwise I would have linked it.

longjack

61 posted on 11/18/2005 5:43:17 PM PST by longjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
"Charging it guts Murtha's thoughtful approach..."

To be honest, it does gut Murtha's thoughtful approach--- which is the
'allah'mentary canal of thoughtful approaches.

62 posted on 11/18/2005 5:43:20 PM PST by melt (Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t2buckeye

Tancredo is reciting the progress and benefits of our presence in Iraqi.


63 posted on 11/18/2005 5:43:24 PM PST by Jemian (Message to Murtha: ONLY COWARDS CUT AND RUN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
She has moxy for sure

She sure does FMC, I saw her on Cable News and she did good!

64 posted on 11/18/2005 5:43:25 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Col. Murtha:

I applaud your 30+ years of service.

But using the traditional Democratic doublespeak, in your case I support your service, but oppose your cut and run position.

In the words of the young prophet Daniel:

Dan 5:27
TEKEL; Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting.
(KJV)

Regretfully and respectfully, I am

An old Navy vet from Oklahoma (WW2)


65 posted on 11/18/2005 5:43:26 PM PST by Ole Okie (Only Democrats and Cowards Cut and Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
... charging it guts Murtha's thoughtful approach to the situation.

The MSM continues its outrageously loony-left biased language: characterizing Congressman Murtha's tripe as Murtha's "thoughtful" approach? That's complete bunk, and is so over the top with left-wing bias that I am somewhat surprised that even the "editors" at AP let it go.

66 posted on 11/18/2005 5:45:00 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: p23185
Never in a gazillion years will they STFU! Not until GWB is impeached, removed, and tried for war crimes!

Until they regain political power again, for THAT is the foremost concern for them at any cost.

67 posted on 11/18/2005 5:46:24 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All

If you catch the replay of Brit Humes show tonight you can see it.


68 posted on 11/18/2005 5:46:40 PM PST by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb; No Longer Free State

PING to comment #42


69 posted on 11/18/2005 5:47:11 PM PST by Former Military Chick (I salute all our Vets, those who walked before me and all those who walk after me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I just read this about Murtha in an AP article:

"As a Vietnam veteran and top Democrat on the House Appropriations defense subcommittee, Murtha carries more credibility with his colleagues on the issue than a number of other Democrats who have opposed the war from the start."
The problem is...it strongly implies that Murtha has NOT opposed the war from the start...when in fact, Murtha, like so many other Dems, DID vote for the authorization, but quickly went against it. It implies this is a recent change in his opinion..when it isn't. Just another example of misleading MSM


70 posted on 11/18/2005 5:47:20 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State
Oh, brother, now the surrender monkeys are claiming we're questioning Murtha's patriotism.

The man is just an old fart.

Granted, he is a veteran....

but that doesn't make him smarter or less a coward NOW!

71 posted on 11/18/2005 5:47:41 PM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MilleniumBug

No I wish I had, it has been shown on various networks. It should be copied and put out there for sure.

Chele


72 posted on 11/18/2005 5:48:14 PM PST by Former Military Chick (I salute all our Vets, those who walked before me and all those who walk after me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Do the Dems not care to hear from The People?



29 posted on 11/18/2005 5:26:05 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes

Unless they are the parasites, perverts, and degenerates that blindly parrot the Democrat Party Line, No they do not care to hear from the people.


73 posted on 11/18/2005 5:48:44 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Sorry but I have to say it this way - The filthy bastards booed and shouted down a message read from a marine colonel?????


74 posted on 11/18/2005 5:50:09 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Bias much? The AP, as usual, manages to crowd novel-length bias into a thousand-word article. First of all, the article is written from a Democrat third-person-limited point of view:

Democrats charge the effort is a cheap political stunt and a personal attack.

Note the lack of any attempt to summarize the Republicans' beliefs.

Instead of offering Murtha's resolution, Republicans plan to reject a similarly worded resolution offered by one of their own to show support for US troops.

The wording is such that it reads like the Republicans are rejecting support for US troops.

Democrats say that's a "counterfeit" resolution, charging it guts Murtha's thoughtful approach to the situation.

Again, no attempt to convey the Republican point of view.

The fiery, emotional debate climaxed when Ohio Congresswoman Jean Schmidt, who is the lowest in seniority, recounted a message a Marine colonel wanted to send to Murtha.

What on earth does her seniority have to do with anything? Other than to associate the term "lowest" with Republicans.

75 posted on 11/18/2005 5:53:30 PM PST by denydenydeny ("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
Where, oh, where are the Rat Libs that represent parts of the country with lots of Jewish voters? The Israeli lobby knows what we are doing in Iraq is right and I think they got the word to them.

The Rats don't give a damn about the Jews!!

except at fund raisers and election day.

I would not be surprised that a future Rat president might convert to Islam as an appeasement technique.

76 posted on 11/18/2005 5:53:41 PM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Williams



I think that is far more important than any other issue of this event. Not booing the messenger but booing the message and how that it, and it seems to be lost on many.

Excellent observation.


77 posted on 11/18/2005 5:55:08 PM PST by Former Military Chick (I salute all our Vets, those who walked before me and all those who walk after me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

I'll join you in questioning his patriotism. A man of his military experience should know what is at stake now in Iraq. Cutting and running is not an option. We did that in Vietnam--3,000,000 people died in the ensuing years in Southeast Asia.


We cut and run after Mogadishu. We got an emboldened Bin Laden and ultimately, 9-11.

In Bosnia and Kosovo, the Dems practically had us usher in thousands of ground troops. Turns out we were lied to then in reality. 100,000 dead minorities turned out to be 2,000. We killed more than that just in innocent civilians from Wesley Clark's brilliantly run 15,000 foot level bombing campaign.Yeah, the Dems were real hawks then.

But I will question Mr. Murtha's patriotism. His proposal puts our military in grave harm, and will embolden terrorists to strike against us here. They will be able to recruit more terrorists, because they will show that they beat the Great Satan. That puts me and my family at risk.

Benedict Arnold was once a great hero of the American Revolution. He did his own cut and run, and yes, even George Washington questioned his patriotism.

A pox on Murtha and his deathwish for our soldiers and our country.


78 posted on 11/18/2005 5:56:38 PM PST by exit82 (Ray Nagin, the mayor of Oz:"If I only had a brain.........")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford

HEAR HEAR......her and Condi.....


79 posted on 11/18/2005 5:56:58 PM PST by Yorlik803 ( Don't crush that Dwarf,hand me the pliers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

One of the Republicans just asked, How do you redeploy from a war on terrorism? Great question


80 posted on 11/18/2005 5:59:19 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson